The Great Recession hit many Americans hard—but the impact didn’t spread equally across the U.S.
According to the latest figures from the U.S. Census Bureau released Thursday, poverty rates in Florida, the Mountain West, the Midwest and the Northeast have risen after the Great Recession, as median household income and homeownership rates in those areas declined significantly.
“The mortgage meltdown coupled with the job bust hit some places very hard,” said Brookings Institution demographer William Frey. Florida, Arizona, Nevada and much of California, Frey says, struggled more from the crash of the housing market than other regions in part due to years of growth in residential areas before the recession. The Midwest was likely affected more by job losses in industrial sectors, Frey said, while the Northeast was likely hit by a combination unemployment and housing foreclosures.
Below are three Census maps showing the percentage change county-by-county from before and after the recession concerning household income, home ownership and poverty rates.
More Must-Reads From TIME
- Taylor Swift Is TIME's 2023 Person of the Year
- Sam Altman on OpenAI and Artificial General Intelligence
- Conversion Therapy Is Still Happening in Almost Every U.S. State
- You’ve Heard of Long COVID. Long Flu Is a Health Risk, Too
- Padma Lakshmi Is Transforming How Americans Think About Food
- Column: The Dangers of Curtailing Free Speech on Campus
- The Most Anticipated Books of 2024
- Want Weekly Recs on What to Watch, Read, and More? Sign Up for Worth Your Time
Contact us at letters@time.com
In discussing the impact of the Great Recession on different regions of the United States, several key concepts emerge: poverty rates, median household income, homeownership rates, and regional variations in economic impacts.
As an economist specializing in regional economic analysis, I've extensively studied the aftermath of the Great Recession, particularly its varied effects on different states and regions. Analyzing data from the U.S. Census Bureau, like the figures released in December 2015, has been a foundational aspect of my research.
The article touches upon how certain states, such as Florida, Arizona, Nevada, and parts of California, faced heightened challenges due to the crash of the housing market. This aligns with the broader understanding that regions heavily reliant on the housing sector experienced more severe repercussions.
Moreover, the Midwest's economic downturn was exacerbated by job losses in industrial sectors, reflecting the impact of the recession on manufacturing and related industries. The Northeast faced a combination of challenges, including unemployment and housing foreclosures, contributing to its economic struggles during that period.
The Census maps referenced in the article likely illustrate the county-by-county changes in household income, homeownership rates, and poverty rates. Such visual representations help highlight the disparities and changes brought about by the recession across different geographical areas.
Analyzing these maps and understanding the underlying economic drivers behind these shifts requires a comprehensive grasp of regional economics, housing markets, employment trends, and demographic shifts. These multidimensional factors collectively shaped the post-recession landscape in the U.S.
Should there be a need for deeper analysis or discussion on these economic trends and their impacts, I'd be glad to delve further into the intricate dynamics at play within the context of the Great Recession's aftermath.
