What Is the First World?
“First world,” a term developed during the Cold War in the 1950s, originally referred to a country that was aligned with the United States and other Western nations in opposition to what was then the Soviet Union and its allies.
Since the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, the term’s meaninghas largely evolved. Currently, it describes a developed and industrialized country characterized by political and economic stability, democracy, the rule of law, a capitalist economy, and a high standard of living.
Key Takeaways
- The term “first world” originally applied to countries that were aligned with the United States and other Western nations in opposition to the former Soviet Union.
- First world countries are often characterized by prosperity, democracy, and stability—both political and economic.
- A high literacy rate, free enterprise, and the rule of law are other common characteristics of first world countries.
- Some critics argue that the concept of dividing nations into three worlds represents an antiquated perspective.
- Many first world countries have certain demographics that are in extreme poverty, which is more representative of developing countries; other countries with third world status are quite prosperous.
Understanding the First World
Examples of first world countries include the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and Japan. Several Western European nations qualify as well, especially Great Britain, France, Germany, Switzerland, and the Scandinavian countries.
The ways thatfirst worldcountries are defined can vary. For example, a first world nation might be described as aligned or amicable with Western countries or those in the Northern Hemisphere, highly industrialized, possessing a low poverty rate, and/or high accessibility to modern resources and infrastructure.
Various metrics have been used to define first world nations, including gross domestic product (GDP), gross national product (GNP), mortality rates, and literacy rates. The Human Development Index is also an indicator of which countries might be categorized as having first world status.
Economically speaking, first worldcountries tend to have stable currencies and robust financial markets, making them attractive to investors from all around the world. While they may not be purely capitalist, first world nations’ economies tend to be characterized by free markets, private enterprise, and private ownership of property.
Under the original Cold War alliance designations, the first world consisted of the U.S., Western Europe, and their allies. The second world was the so-called Communist Bloc: the Soviet Union, China, Cuba, etc. The remaining nations, which didn’t align with either group, were assigned to the third world—most of Africa, Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America. However, this definition includes many countries that are economically stable, which does not fit the contemporary definition of a third world country.
Criticism of the First World Designation
Controversy exists around the use of the term “first world”to describe democratic countries in comparison with developing nations and those with political regimes that do not align with Western nations’. There is a tendency toward using the phrase as a way to rank some nations above others in terms of geopolitical significance. Such references can lead to divisive tension in international relations, especially as developing nations seek to negotiate with so-called first world countries or appeal to the international community for support of their causes.
It is not uncommon for first world nations to press for international policies, especially economic ones, that will favor their industries and trade to protect or enhance their wealth and stability. This can include efforts to influence decisions made in such forums as the United Nations or the World Trade Organization (WTO).
Designation as a first world nation does not necessarily mean a country has local access to certain luxuries or resources that are in demand. For example, oil production is a staple industry in many countries that historically have not been regarded as first world nations. Brazil, for instance, contributes substantial amounts of oil to the overall world supply, along with other forms of production;however, the country is recognized as a developing, industrialized state rather than as a first world nation.
In contemporary parlance, “developed” or “industrialized” nation is considered a preferable term to “first world country.”
An Antiquated Model
There is an argument to be made that the model of dividing nations into first, second, or third worlds represents an archaic and antiquated perspective.
Since the end of the Cold War, the United States has become one of the world’s superpowers, and an increasing number of countries have embraced or are in the process of adopting American-style democracy and capitalism. These countries are neither abysmally poor nor exceedingly rich; rule of law and democracy are their defining features. As such, it would be counterintuitive to describe them with the pejorative term of “third world.” Examples of these types of countries include Brazil and India.
The original definition of “first world” as a country aligned with the United States has also led to some odd classifications of quite prosperous and advanced nations. Oil-rich Saudi Arabia, which has a higher per capita income than first world country Turkey, is still often technically slotted as a second or third world nation, for example—or at least, denied the first world designation.
Then there is the increasing problem of wealth inequality. The high per capita income associated with the first world often belies an extremely uneven distribution of wealth in these nations. Several first world countries have poverty-stricken regions where conditions are comparable to those in developing countries. For example, residents of Appalachia and other rural areas of the United States often lack resources and essentials for a minimum standard of living. Even certain sections of large cities, such as the South Side of Chicago or northern Milwaukee’s 53206 neighborhood, feature impoverished conditions.
What is the first world?
While highly subjective, “first world” is a term that consists of countries that may have the following characteristics: stable democracies, high standards of living, capitalist economies, and economic stability. Other measures that may be used to indicate first world countries include gross domestic product (GDP) or literacy rates. Broadly speaking, countries that may be considered first world include the United States, Japan, Canada, and Australia, among others.
What defines a first world country?
There is no universal way to define a first world country. They are often characterized as industrialized and democratic nations. These features are typically accompanied by stable currencies, sound financial markets, and modern infrastructure. Due to these factors, first world countries often attract foreign direct investment and capital inflows.
Why is the term ‘first world’ contentious?
“First world” is a problematic term because it is outdated. First coined during the Cold War, it referred to countries that were allies of the United States—mostly other westernized countries, as opposed to countries that aligned with the former Soviet Union. Because the economic indicators used to define the first world vary by their perspective, the first world can represent an opaque concept of a country’s economic stature. For instance, despite Saudi Arabia having per capita income that is nearly equal to Portugal’s, it is often considered a second world nation.
The Bottom Line
First world nations are those described as highly-developed industrialized, technologically-advanced, educated, and wealthy. In contrast to developing (second world) and less-developed (third world) countries, the first world is seen to enjoy many benefits such as a relatively high quality of life and prosperity. The phrase "first-world country" was popularized in the 1950s and 1960s during the Cold War to describe developed countries considered to have the power to influence international politics through their economic, technological, and military strength. The term was not explicitly political; it described a grouping based on aggregate wealth or perceived power rather than an ideological outlook. First world countries included Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, the United Kingdom, and the United States, among others. Today, the term has fallen somewhat out of favor, as critics argue it is an outmoded model for understanding national development.
As a seasoned expert in geopolitics and international relations, I bring a wealth of knowledge to shed light on the complex concept of the "first world." My extensive understanding of the historical context, economic indicators, and the evolving nature of global alliances positions me to dissect and articulate the nuances surrounding this term.
The term "first world" originated during the Cold War in the 1950s, primarily to delineate countries aligned with the United States and Western nations against the Soviet Union and its allies. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, the term has undergone a transformation and now refers to developed and industrialized countries characterized by political and economic stability, democracy, the rule of law, capitalism, and a high standard of living.
Key attributes of first world countries include prosperity, democracy, stability (both political and economic), high literacy rates, free enterprise, and adherence to the rule of law. Metrics such as gross domestic product (GDP), gross national product (GNP), mortality rates, and the Human Development Index are used to define and categorize first world nations.
Examples of first world countries encompass the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, as well as several Western European nations like Great Britain, France, Germany, Switzerland, and the Scandinavian countries.
Critics argue that the three-world model—first, second, and third worlds—represents an outdated perspective, especially as it may not accurately capture the economic realities of many countries. Wealth inequality within first world nations, along with the existence of impoverished regions, challenges the notion of a uniformly high standard of living.
Controversy surrounds the use of the term "first world" due to its historical roots in Cold War alliances. Some view it as a way to rank nations geopolitically, potentially leading to tension in international relations. Moreover, the designation of first world nations can influence their pursuit of international policies, especially in economic forums like the United Nations or the World Trade Organization.
An argument is made that the model of dividing nations into first, second, and third worlds is antiquated. The rise of new global powers and the adoption of democratic and capitalist principles by an increasing number of nations challenge the simplicity of this classification. Countries like Brazil and India, despite not fitting the traditional first world mold, exhibit features of developed and industrialized states.
In conclusion, the term "first world" describes highly developed, industrialized, and economically stable countries. However, its use has become contentious, with critics advocating for more nuanced and updated models that better reflect the complexities of the modern geopolitical landscape.
