Unlawful Presence and Inadmissibility | USCIS (2024)

Unlawful presence is the period of time when you are in the United States without being admitted or paroled or when you are not in a “period of stay authorized by the Secretary.” You will be found inadmissible (unless an exception applies):

Determining if you are inadmissible after accruing unlawful presence can be complex. If you need help or legal advice on immigration matters, make sure the person helping you is authorized to give legal advice. You can find information about authorized legal services on ourAvoid Scamspage.

Accruing Unlawful Presence

According to section 212(a)(9)(B)(ii) of the INA, you accrue unlawful presence if:

  • You are present in the United States without being admitted or paroled; or
  • You have remained in the United States after the expiration of the period of stay authorized by the DHS secretary.

If you are in the United States without having been admitted to or paroled into the country by an immigration officer, then you started accruing unlawful presence on the day you entered the country without admission or parole.

In general, if you were admitted or paroled into the United States by an immigration officer, you were issued or received aForm I‑94, Arrival/Departure Record, which shows a specific date when you are required to leave. Typically, you start accruing unlawful presence if you remain in the United States after the date noted on your Form I-94. However, if you are admitted for duration of status (D/S) and your Form I-94 is marked “D/S”, then you may stay in the United States for the duration of your program, course of study, or temporary work assignment to the United States, plus any additional grace periods that may be authorized afterward.

In theAdjudicator’s Field Manual (AFM) Chapter 40.9.2 (PDF, 1017.74 KB), we outline when you are considered to be in a “period of stay authorized.” If you are in the United States maintaining lawful status,meet the requirements for an exception, or are otherwise considered to be in a period of stay authorized by the DHS secretary, then you do not accrue unlawful presence.

The law also provides exceptions for accrual of unlawful presence to the following noncitizens:

  • Asylees: Time while a nonfrivolous asylum application is pending is not counted as unlawful presence.
  • Minors: Children do not accrue unlawful presence while they are under age 18.
  • Family Unity beneficiaries: Individuals with protection under the Family Unity program, as provided under section 301 of the Immigration Act of 1990, do not accrue unlawful presence while that protection is in effect.

The law also provides exceptions to the three-year and 10-year unlawful presence grounds of inadmissibility generally for:

  • Battered spouses and children: The three-year and 10-year unlawful presence grounds of inadmissibility do not apply to self-petitioners under the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) and their dependents if they can establish a substantial connection between the battery or extreme cruelty that is the basis for the VAWA claim and the violation of the terms of the noncitizen’s nonimmigrant visa.
  • Victims of severe forms of trafficking in persons: The three-year and 10-year unlawful presence grounds of inadmissibility do not apply to trafficking victims who demonstrate that a severe form of trafficking was at least one central reason why they were unlawfully present in the United States.

These exceptions apply only to the three-year and 10-year unlawful presence grounds of inadmissibility found in INA 212(a)(9)(B)(i)(I) and (II). They do not apply to the permanent unlawful presence ground of inadmissibility found in INA 212(a)(9)(C)(i)(I).

In addition to these exceptions provided by law, there are also some special circ*mstances when your lawful status may have expired or you may have entered without admission or parole, but for purposes of counting your unlawful presence towards the three-year, 10-year, and permanent unlawful presence grounds of inadmissibility, you are considered to be in a period of stay authorized by the DHS secretary. When any of these circ*mstances described in theAdjudicator’s Field Manual, Chapter 40.9.2 (PDF, 1017.74 KB)apply, you generally are not accruing unlawful presence.

The Three-Year Unlawful Presence Ground of Inadmissibility

If you are a noncitizenand you are not a lawful permanent resident of the United States, you are inadmissible (unless an exception applies) if:

  • You accrued more than 180 days but less than one year of unlawful presence during a single stay in the United States on or after April 1, 1997;
  • You voluntarily departed the United States before DHS initiated either expedited removal proceedings under INA 235(b)(1) or removal proceedings before an immigration judge under INA 240; and
  • You again seek admission within three years of your departure following your accrual of unlawful presence.

The statutory three-year period starts when you depart the United States.

You are not inadmissible under the three-year unlawful presence ground of inadmissibility if you accrued more than 180 days but less than one year of unlawful presence and left the United States after the commencement of removal proceedings, but before the one-year mark. Even if you are not inadmissible under this ground of inadmissibility, you could be inadmissible for other reasons. If you leave the United States after the commencement of removal proceedings, including voluntarily, it is your responsibility to inform theExecutive Office for Immigration Review. If you fail to attend removal proceedings and/or if the immigration judge orders you removed in absentia, you could still be inadmissible, even if the reason you did not attend the removal proceedings was due to your departure.

The 10-Year Unlawful Presence Ground of Inadmissibility

If you are a noncitizen and are not a lawful permanent resident of the United States, you are inadmissible (unless an exception applies) if:

  • You accrued one year or more of unlawful presence during a single stay in the United States on or after April 1, 1997;
  • You departed the United States or were removed from the United States under any provision of law; and
  • You again seek admission within 10 years of your departure or removal following your accrual of unlawful presence.

The 10-year unlawful presence ground of inadmissibility applies whether you leave before, during, or after DHS initiated removal proceedings.

This statutory 10-year period starts when you depart or are removed from the United States.

If you are inadmissible under the three-year or the 10-year unlawful presence grounds of inadmissibility, you may be eligible to apply for a waiver of inadmissibility. The legal requirements and procedures for applying for the waiver depend on the immigration benefit you seek.

The Permanent Unlawful Presence Ground of Inadmissibility

If you are a noncitizen, you may be inadmissible forever under INA 212(a)(9)(C)(i)(I) if:

  • You accrued an aggregate period of more than one year of unlawful presence in the United States on or after April 1, 1997, and then departed the United States or were removed from the United States; and
  • You entered or attempted to reenter the United States on or after April 1, 1997, without a DHS officer admitting or paroling you into the United States.

“Aggregate period” means the total number of days of unlawful presence that you accumulated during all of your stays in the United States combined.

If the permanent unlawful presence ground of inadmissibility applies to you, you will be permanently ineligible to:

  • Receive an immigrant or a nonimmigrant visa to come to the United States;
  • Adjust your status in the United States to that of a lawful permanent resident (Green Card holder); or
  • Be admitted to the United States at a port of entry.

Although you are permanently inadmissible under this ground, you may ask for permission to reapply for admission to the United States, but only if you have been physically outside the United States for at least 10 years since the date of your last departure. This permission is called “consent to reapply for admission” to the United States. You must apply for consent to reapply for admission from outside the United States. If your application for consent to reapply for admission is denied, then you remain inadmissible on this ground. Additional information about consent to reapply is available on ourForm I-212, Application for Permission to Reapply for Admission into the United States after Deportation or Removalpage.

There may be other ways to overcome this ground of inadmissibility, depending on the immigration benefit that you are applying for. See the next section below entitled,If An Unlawful Presence Ground of Inadmissibility Applies To You,for more information.

If an Unlawful Presence Ground of Inadmissibility Applies to You

Whether an unlawful presence ground of inadmissibility applies to you depends on the immigration benefit you are seeking. Depending on the immigration benefit you are seeking, the law may exempt you from the ground of inadmissibility.

If you are inadmissible due to one or more of the unlawful presence grounds of inadmissibility, you generally cannot obtain a visa from the U.S. Department of State, enter the United States at a port of entry, or obtain an immigration benefit such as adjustment of status (Green Card) in the United States without first obtaining a waiver or another form of relief (such as consent to reapply for admission).

You can find information about some of the waivers or forms of relief on the following form pages:

  • Form I-192, Application for Advance Permission to Enter as a Nonimmigrant
  • Form I-601, Application for Waiver of Grounds of Inadmissibility
  • Form I-601A, Application for Provisional Unlawful Presence Waiver
  • Form I-212, Application for Permission to Reapply for Admission into the United States After Deportation or Removal

Untimely Motions to Reopen for Certain USCIS Denials

On June 24, 2022 we published new policy guidance in the USCIS Policy Manual concerning the effect of returning to the United States during the statutory three-year or 10-year period after departure or removal. Under this policy guidance, a noncitizen who again seeks admission more than three years or 10 years after the relevant departure or removal is not inadmissible under INA 212(a)(9)(B), even if the noncitizen returned to the United States, with or without authorization, during the statutory three-year or 10-year period.

Generally, under 8 CFR 103.5(a)(1)(i), a motion to reopen filed by an applicant or petitioner must be filed within 30 days of the decision that the motion seeks to reopen. However, on or before December 27, 2022, you may file an untimely motion to reopen your previously denied application with USCIS on Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion, and in accordance with the form instructions and filing fee, if:

  • You returned to the United States during the statutory three-year or 10-year period;
  • You filed your application with USCIS after the expiration of the statutory three-year or 10-year period; and
  • We denied your application on or after April 4, 2016, solely based upon inadmissibility under INA 212(a)(9)(B) and your return to the United States during the statutory three-year or 10-year period.

You should write “Return to United States during three-year or 10-year statutory period” to assist with identification and to prevent rejection for untimely filing. We will accept untimely motions to reopen that meet the requirements above. Any individual in litigation on this basis may work through the government’s representative in litigation. If your case is reopened, it will be adjudicated under the new policy guidance

More Information about Unlawful Presence and the Bars

You can find more information on unlawful presence in AFM Chapter 40.9.2 (PDF, 1017.74 KB). You can also find additional information about grounds of inadmissibility in the USCIS Policy Manual.

As someone deeply immersed in the field of U.S. immigration law, I bring forth a wealth of knowledge and expertise on the intricacies of unlawful presence and its implications. My understanding of the legal framework, supported by a comprehensive grasp of relevant statutes and regulations, enables me to elucidate the complexities involved in determining inadmissibility due to unlawful presence.

The concept of unlawful presence, as outlined in section 212(a)(9)(B)(ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), hinges on being in the United States without proper admission or parole, or exceeding the authorized period of stay granted by the DHS secretary. This accrual of unlawful presence triggers inadmissibility, unless specific exceptions apply.

Crucially, the Adjudicator's Field Manual (AFM) Chapter 40.9.2 serves as a guide in establishing when an individual is considered to be in a "period of stay authorized." This distinction is pivotal, as those in lawful status, meeting exceptions, or falling under the purview of DHS secretary authorization do not accumulate unlawful presence.

Exceptions abound for various categories, such as asylees, minors, and Family Unity beneficiaries. Notably, the article delves into exceptions for victims of severe trafficking and battered spouses and children under the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA).

The article also intricately details the three-year, 10-year, and permanent unlawful presence grounds of inadmissibility, each contingent on specific durations of unlawful presence and subsequent actions. Moreover, it sheds light on the possibility of seeking a waiver of inadmissibility under certain circ*mstances.

A critical facet discussed is the permanent unlawful presence ground, where an individual may be perpetually inadmissible if a cumulative period of more than one year of unlawful presence is recorded after April 1, 1997. The prospect of seeking consent to reapply for admission after a decade outside the U.S. is elucidated, and alternative routes to overcome this inadmissibility ground are hinted at.

Furthermore, the article delves into the nuanced scenario where an individual might be inadmissible under the three-year or 10-year grounds but can apply for a waiver depending on the immigration benefit sought. It emphasizes the necessity of waivers or other forms of relief for inadmissible individuals attempting to secure visas, entry, or immigration benefits.

Additionally, the article touches upon untimely motions to reopen for certain USCIS denials, offering a glimpse into the recent policy changes regarding re-entry after the statutory three-year or 10-year period.

In summary, my expertise allows me to dissect and explain the intricate facets of unlawful presence and its ramifications in the context of U.S. immigration law, backed by a thorough understanding of statutory provisions, exceptions, and recent policy changes.

Unlawful Presence and Inadmissibility | USCIS (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Rev. Porsche Oberbrunner

Last Updated:

Views: 6366

Rating: 4.2 / 5 (73 voted)

Reviews: 88% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Rev. Porsche Oberbrunner

Birthday: 1994-06-25

Address: Suite 153 582 Lubowitz Walks, Port Alfredoborough, IN 72879-2838

Phone: +128413562823324

Job: IT Strategist

Hobby: Video gaming, Basketball, Web surfing, Book restoration, Jogging, Shooting, Fishing

Introduction: My name is Rev. Porsche Oberbrunner, I am a zany, graceful, talented, witty, determined, shiny, enchanting person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.