Racial/Ethnic Disparities (R/ED) | Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (2024)

Overview

The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) is a leader in efforts to reduce the overrepresentation of minority youth in the Nation's juvenile justice system. Funding through OJJDP's Formula Grants program (Title II) helps states address juvenile delinquency and supports improvements to the juvenile justice system.

The funds also help states address the core requirements of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDPA):

  • deinstitutionalization of status offenders,
  • separation of juveniles from adult inmates,
  • removal of juveniles from adult jails and lockups, and
  • identify and reduce racial and ethnic disparities (R/ED) among youth who come into contact with the juvenile justice system.

Racial and ethnic disparities exist if a specific minority group's rate of contact at a particular point in the juvenile justice system is different than the rate of contact for non-Hispanic whites or other minority groups.

Beginning in fiscal year 2019, OJJDP's State Relations and Assistance Division (SRAD) implemented a streamlined Title II application process that simplified racial and ethnic disparities data collection requirements.

States achieve compliance with this core requirement when they address racial and ethnic disparities through the following: identification, development of an action plan, and an outcome-based evaluation.

The number of contact points for which reporting is required has been narrowed to five that research supports as the most critical. In addition, OJJDP will now be asking states to identify how they define success with their racial and ethnic disparities reduction efforts and to evaluate the outcome of their plans to assess what impact they had, if any, on disproportionality.

Core Requirement of JJDP Act

In December 2018, theJuvenile Justice Reform Act of 2018(JJRA) was signed into law, reauthorizing and substantially amending the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 (JJDPA).

Pursuant to the JJDPA, as amended at 34 U.S.C. § 11133(a)(15), states and territories must ”implement policy, practice, and system improvement strategies at the state, territorial, local, and Tribal levels, as applicable, to identify and reduce racial and ethnic disparities among youth who come into contact with the juvenile justice system, without establishing or requiring numerical standards or quotas, by—

  1. Establishing or designating existing coordinating bodies, composed of juvenile justice stakeholders (including representatives of the educational system) at the state, local, or Tribal levels, to advise efforts by states, units of local government, and Indian Tribes to reduce racial and ethnic disparities;
  2. Identifying and analyzing data on race and ethnicity at decision points in state, local, or Tribal juvenile justice systems to determine which such points create racial and ethnic disparities among youth who come into contact with the juvenile justice system; and
  3. Developing and implementing a work plan that includes measurable objectives for policy, practice, or other system changes, based on the needs identified in the data collection and analysis under subparagraph (B).

Each State must report on its progress in its comprehensive JJDP 3-year plan and subsequent plan updates. OJJDP reviews the plan updates annually. Any State that fails to identify and reduce racial and ethnic disparities among youth who come into contact with the juvenile justice system stands to lose 20 percent of its Formula Grants allocation for the year.

New Approach to Reducing Racial and Ethnic Disparities

To be eligible to receive federal funding, states are required to implement plans to reduce disproportionate minority contact, as outlined in the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act. OJJDP is committed to working with states to reduce racial and ethnic disparities (R/ED) formerly known as disproportionate minority contact (DMC). In 2018, OJJDP implemented a new, outcome-based approach to assessing states' efforts to address racial and ethnic disparities among minority youth within the juvenile justice system. Data is now collected on five research-supported points of contact in the court system where DMC most often occurs. They are:

  1. Arrest
  2. Diversion (filing of charges)
  3. Pre-trial detention (both secure and nonsecure)
  4. Disposition commitments (secure and nonsecure)
  5. Adult transfer

By focusing states' reduction efforts on these five pivotal points of contact, and by enhancing technical assistance to states aimed at reducing disproportionate contact of minority youth with the juvenile justice system, we hope to see significant reductions in racial and ethnic disparities.

Resources

Racial/Ethnic Disparities (R/ED) | Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (2024)

FAQs

What racial and ethnic disparities exist in the juvenile justice system? ›

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine reports that, although White youth represent 75% of the adolescent population, they make up only 45% of arrests for violent crimes. In comparison, Black youth, who represent 15% of the population, are involved in 52% of juvenile arrests for violent crimes.

How can we reduce racial disparity in the juvenile justice system? ›

Improve Youth-Police Relationships

To help reduce disparities at the arrest stage, as well as to reduce the number of overall arrests, many communities conduct training programs for law enforcement that help police to develop skills that enable more positive interactions with youth, particularly youth of color.

Which racial ethnic group is most largely over represented in the juvenile justice system? ›

Race/Ethnicity: (edit)
CaliforniaPercent
African American/Black27.0%
Hispanic/Latino53.0%
White14.4%
Another Group5.5%

How does race play a role in the juvenile justice system? ›

Black girls are 2.7 times more likely than white girls to be referred to juvenile justice and are 1.2 times more likely to be detained. Black girls are three times more likely to be removed from their homes and placed in state custody than are white girls.

How does the American juvenile justice system address issues of racial and ethnic disparities in juvenile prisons? ›

Much of the work to address racial and ethnic disparities in the juvenile justice system has been driven by amendments to the federal Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDPA) through the federal Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP).

What are 3 problems in the juvenile justice system? ›

Sexual abuse, ongoing criminal activity, and isolation are some of the more common problems within the juvenile justice system.

What are 3 approaches to preventing juvenile delinquency? ›

Improving education and youth employment opportunities, enhancing social skills, and providing youth with mentors and adult role models are essential components of delinquency prevention.

How to solve racial discipline disparities? ›

Conduct a comprehensive review of school programs, student engagement, and discipline data; review current efforts to reduce racial inequities in disciplinary data; and adopt an exclusionary disciplinary rubric aligned to the student code of conduct.

What is the biggest issue facing the juvenile justice system? ›

Solitary Confinement & Harsh Conditions

Kids nationwide are facing solitary confinement, strip searches, and physical and sexual abuse.

What race has the most juvenile crime? ›

For most offenses, Black youth were arrested at higher rates than white youth in 2020.

What term is used to describe racial disparities in school punishment and juvenile justice? ›

Definitions. Although racial and ethnic disparities in the juvenile justice system are not new, the terminology has changed over time. The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) refers to racial and ethnic disparities in the juvenile justice system as disproportionate minority contact.

Why are black youth more likely to be incarcerated? ›

Black youth are burdened by a presumption of guilt and dangerousness — a legacy of our history of racial injustice that marks youth of color for disparately frequent stops, searches, and violence and leads to higher rates of childhood suspension, expulsion, and arrest at school; disproportionate contact with the ...

What is intersectionality in juvenile justice system? ›

The term ​“intersectionality” recognizes this connection between identity, structures, power, discrimination and outcomes. A recent Foundation report on LGBTQ youth in the juvenile justice system analyzed disaggregated juvenile justice system data by race, gender identity, gender expression and sexual orientation.

How do we reduce juvenile delinquency across the board within the United States? ›

Strengthen and Mobilize Communities. Communities play the primary role in preventing juvenile delinquency and the criminal victimization of juveniles. With Federal and State leadership and support, communities can successfully change local conditions to help youth become lawabiding, productive citizens.

What is an example of disproportionate minority contact? ›

Among those juveniles who are arrested, black juveniles are more likely to be referred to a juvenile court than are white juveniles. They are more likely to be processed (and less likely to be diverted). Among those adjudicated delinquent, they are more likely to be sent to secure confinement.

What is racial and ethnic disparities? ›

Racial and ethnic disparity refers to unequal treatment of youth of color in the juvenile justice system. RED results in disparate outcomes for similarly situated youth. Disparate treatment can happen at all stages of the juvenile justice system, from arrest, summons, processing, arraignment, detention and commitment.

What are examples of cultural diversity issues in criminal justice? ›

Some examples of cultural diversity issues in the criminal justice system are racial profiling and unfair judicial bias. Racial profiling is when someone is targeted based on their ethnicity or race, as related to a stereotype associated with that group.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Nathanial Hackett

Last Updated:

Views: 5930

Rating: 4.1 / 5 (52 voted)

Reviews: 83% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Nathanial Hackett

Birthday: 1997-10-09

Address: Apt. 935 264 Abshire Canyon, South Nerissachester, NM 01800

Phone: +9752624861224

Job: Forward Technology Assistant

Hobby: Listening to music, Shopping, Vacation, Baton twirling, Flower arranging, Blacksmithing, Do it yourself

Introduction: My name is Nathanial Hackett, I am a lovely, curious, smiling, lively, thoughtful, courageous, lively person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.