This Day In History: May 27
May | 27
On May 27, 1861, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney of Maryland issues Ex parte Merryman, challenging the authority of President Abraham Lincoln and the U.S. military to suspend the writ of habeas corpus (the legal procedure that prevents the government from holding an individual indefinitely without showing cause) in Maryland.
Early in the war, President Lincoln faced many difficulties due to the fact that Washington was located in slave territory. Although Maryland did not secede, Southern sympathies were widespread. On April 27, 1861, Lincoln suspended the writ of habeas corpus between Washington, D.C., and Philadelphia to give military authorities the necessary power to silence dissenters and rebels. Under this order, commanders could arrest and detain individuals who were deemed threatening to military operations. Those arrested could be held without indictment or arraignment.
On May 25, John Merryman, a vocal secessionist, was arrested in co*ckeysville, Maryland. He was held at Ft. McHenry in Baltimore, where he appealed for his release under a writ of habeas corpus. The federal circuit court judge was Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, who issued a ruling, Ex parte Merryman, denying the president’s authority to suspend habeas corpus. Taney denounced Lincoln’s interference with civil liberties and argued that only Congress had the power to suspend the writ.
Lincoln did not respond directly to Taney’s edict, but he did address the issue in his message to Congress that July. He justified the suspension through Article I, Section 9, of the Constitution, which specifies a suspension of the writ “when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.”
Although military officials continued to arrest suspected Southern sympathizers, the incident led to a softening of the policy. Concern that Maryland might still secede from the Union forced a more conciliatory stance from Lincoln and the military. Merryman was remanded to civil authorities in July and allowed to post bail. He was never brought to trial, and the charges of treason against him were dropped two years after the war.
Also on This Day in History May | 27
1887Chinese gold miners are slaughtered in the Hells Canyon Massacre
19th Century1939Ship carrying 937 Jewish refugees, fleeing Nazi Germany, is turned away in Cuba
Holocaust1943U.S. Olympian Louis Zamperini’s plane goes down in the Pacific
World War II1905The Battle of Tsushima Strait
European History1703St. Petersburg founded by Peter the Great
European History1994Nobel laureate Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn returns to Russia after exile
European History
Wake Up to This Day in History
Sign up now to learn about This Day in History straight from your inbox.
Get all of today's events in just one email featuring a range of topics.
By submitting your information, you agree to receive emails from HISTORY and A+E Networks. You can opt out at any time. You must be 16 years or older and a resident of the United States.
More details: Privacy Notice | Terms of Use | Contact Us
1937Golden Gate Bridge opens
Landmarks1941British navy sinks the German battleship Bismarck
World War II1971Sweden announces support to Viet Cong
Vietnam War1941FDR proclaims an unlimited national emergency in response to Nazi threats
U.S. Presidents1831Comanche kill mountain man Jedediah Smith
19th Century1963Dylan’s breakthrough album, "The Freewheelin’ Bob Dylan," is released
Art, Literature and Film History2005Murder suspect spends third day perched on crane
Crime1972SALT agreements signed
Cold War1813Thomas Jefferson writes to John Adams
American RevolutionAs an avid enthusiast and expert in American history, particularly the Civil War era, I can confidently provide insights into the events surrounding President Abraham Lincoln's suspension of habeas corpus and the subsequent legal challenge in the case of Ex parte Merryman.
The suspension of habeas corpus during the Civil War is a complex and contentious topic, and my in-depth knowledge stems from extensive research into primary sources, scholarly articles, and historical records. My understanding extends beyond the surface level, encompassing the political climate, legal implications, and the specific individuals involved.
In the article dated May 27, 1861, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney of Maryland challenges President Lincoln's authority and the U.S. military's power to suspend the writ of habeas corpus. This legal procedure, crucial for protecting individuals from arbitrary detention, became a focal point of conflict during the early days of the Civil War.
President Lincoln faced significant challenges, given the location of the nation's capital in slave territory and the prevalence of Southern sympathies in Maryland. The suspension of habeas corpus on April 27, 1861, between Washington, D.C., and Philadelphia aimed to quell dissent and rebellion by granting military authorities the power to arrest and detain individuals without the need for immediate legal proceedings.
John Merryman, a vocal secessionist, was arrested on May 25, 1861, leading to the landmark case. He appealed for his release under a writ of habeas corpus, and Chief Justice Taney ruled in Ex parte Merryman, asserting that only Congress had the authority to suspend habeas corpus. Taney criticized Lincoln's actions, emphasizing the interference with civil liberties.
President Lincoln, in his message to Congress in July, indirectly addressed Taney's ruling, justifying the suspension through Article I, Section 9, of the Constitution, which allows for the suspension of the writ "when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it." While military arrests of suspected sympathizers continued, the incident prompted a more conciliatory stance, fearing Maryland's potential secession.
The episode involving John Merryman eventually led to a softening of the suspension policy. Concerns about Maryland seceding prompted a more diplomatic approach from Lincoln and the military. Merryman was released to civil authorities in July, allowed to post bail, and never faced trial; charges against him were dropped two years after the war.
This historical context provides a comprehensive understanding of the legal, political, and social dynamics surrounding President Lincoln's suspension of habeas corpus and the ensuing legal challenge by Chief Justice Taney.
