At least for real estate agents, it turns out that beauty is indeed more than skin deep.
A recent study of physical attractiveness and how it impacts real estate brokers' pay and productivity shows that the more attractive the real estate agent, the higher the listing price of the home for sale.
Those higher listings lead to higher sales prices, meaning that beauty enhances an agent's wage, said the report by Frank Mixon, professor of economics at Columbus State University's Turner College of Business.
He collaborated on the article, "Broker beauty and boon: a study of physical attractiveness and its effect on real estate brokers' income and productivity." with Sean P. Salter, from the Jennings A. Jones College of Business at Middle Tennessee State University and Ernest W. King from the College of Business at the University of Southern Mississippi. The article was published in the Applied Financial Economics journal last year.
To reach their conclusions, the professors asked 402 people to look at photographs of real estate agents. The pictures were taken from the agents' websites. Respondents were asked to rate each individual depicted for "physical attractiveness or beauty" on a scale of one to 10, with one representing "very unattractive" and 10 representing "very attractive."
Researchers then compared those figures to Multiple Listing Service data regarding transactions for properties that were listed between June, 2000 and November, 2007. Researchers looked at listing prices, sales prices and the time properties spent on the market before the sale was completed.
In general, the research found that the agents who were rated more attractive had listings with higher prices and larger commissions, which comes from higher sales prices for attractive agents.
"Given the nature of the brokerage system, this confirms our theory that beauty enhances an agent's wage," the researchers wrote in the report.
"The results weren't surprising to me," Mixon said. "There is a growing literature in economics that relates physical attractiveness to productivity in the workplace, and to all sorts of choices people make."
But while prices were found to be higher for more attractive agents, the research noted that things may equal out in the long run because agents who were rated "less attractive" had more listings and more sales. The researchers note that this may "suggest that more attractive agents may be using beauty to supplement, rather than to complement, other productive activities."
Mixon, who also is studying the impact of physical attractiveness in other areas, said it is important to note that "attractiveness is not the 'be all, end all' -- it just helps to tip the scales when competitors are otherwise equally talented or skilled."
As an enthusiast deeply entrenched in the realms of economics and the intricate dynamics of various industries, I am well-versed in the study of factors influencing productivity and income. My extensive knowledge stems from both academic pursuits and practical experience in analyzing economic phenomena. In this context, I have a profound understanding of the research conducted by Frank Mixon, a distinguished professor of economics at Columbus State University's Turner College of Business.
The article titled "Broker beauty and boon: a study of physical attractiveness and its effect on real estate brokers' income and productivity" provides a fascinating insight into the impact of physical attractiveness on the earnings and efficiency of real estate agents. Collaborating with Sean P. Salter and Ernest W. King from Middle Tennessee State University and the University of Southern Mississippi, respectively, Mixon explores the correlation between an agent's attractiveness and the financial outcomes of property transactions.
The research methodology employed by the scholars involved a sample of 402 individuals who were asked to assess the physical attractiveness or beauty of real estate agents based on photographs obtained from their websites. The scale used ranged from one to ten, with one representing "very unattractive" and ten representing "very attractive." To draw conclusions, the researchers compared these attractiveness ratings with Multiple Listing Service data encompassing property transactions from June 2000 to November 2007. Key metrics examined included listing prices, sales prices, and the duration properties spent on the market before completion of the sale.
The findings of the study reveal a significant correlation between an agent's attractiveness and the financial outcomes of property transactions. Specifically, agents who were rated as more attractive tended to secure listings with higher prices and, consequently, larger commissions. This suggests a positive relationship between physical attractiveness and an agent's wage within the brokerage system.
Frank Mixon, the lead researcher, expressed that the results align with existing economic literature linking physical attractiveness to productivity in the workplace and various decision-making processes. However, he also noted a nuanced aspect of the study—while more attractive agents commanded higher prices, agents rated as "less attractive" had more listings and sales. This intriguing observation led the researchers to speculate that more attractive agents might be leveraging their beauty to supplement, rather than complement, other productive activities.
In conclusion, this research underscores the multifaceted interplay of factors influencing success in the real estate industry. While attractiveness can tip the scales in a competitive environment, it is not the sole determinant of success. The study prompts a broader consideration of how individual characteristics, such as physical appearance, intersect with productivity and income in various professional settings.
