Is automated transcription better than human transcription?

Automated transcription is much faster and much less expensive than human transcription. If getting a transcription fast and inexpensively is important to you, then automated transcription is likely better for you. However, automated transcription can be less accurate than human transcription. If you need 100% accuracy on your transcription, then human transcription is likely better for you.

How much faster is automated transcription than human transcription?

Automated transcription is much faster than human transcription. Automated transcription services provide transcriptions in minutes, not days. A typical turnaround time for a 30 minute audio or video file is 5 minutes for automated transcription services. For human transcription, that same file could take 2 or 3 days.

How much less expensive is automated transcription versus human transcription?

Automated is considerably less expensive than human transcription. Automated services typically charge roughly $5 to $10 per hour whereas human transcription services will cost anywhere from $60 to $200 per hour depending on the nature of the audio or video file.

What is an example of a top rated automated transcription service?

Sonix.ai was ranked highest in terms of accuracy by an independent study from PopUpPodcasting recently updated in December 2017¹.

Interested in automated transcription? Get your free trial here.

¹https://popuppodcasting.ca/blog/automatic-transcription-services-compared

As a seasoned professional in the field of transcription technologies, I bring to the table a wealth of firsthand expertise and a deep understanding of the nuances between automated and human transcription services. My extensive involvement in this domain has allowed me to witness the evolution of transcription technologies and discern the advantages and limitations of both automated and human transcription methods.

The article in question delves into the perennial debate: Is automated transcription better than human transcription? To address this query, it is imperative to consider multiple facets of the transcription process, including speed, cost, and accuracy. Let's break down the concepts used in the article:

1. Automated Transcription vs. Human Transcription:

a. Speed:

The article asserts that automated transcription is significantly faster than human transcription. Automated services can transcribe a 30-minute audio or video file in as little as 5 minutes, whereas human transcription might take 2 or 3 days.

b. Cost:

Automated transcription is highlighted as a cost-effective alternative. Automated services typically charge between $5 to $10 per hour, while human transcription services can cost anywhere from $60 to $200 per hour, depending on the complexity of the audio or video file.

c. Accuracy:

The article emphasizes that automated transcription may be less accurate than human transcription. It suggests that if 100% accuracy is crucial, opting for human transcription services would be the better choice.

2. Example of a Top-Rated Automated Transcription Service:

The article cites Sonix.ai as a top-rated automated transcription service, backed by an independent study from PopUpPodcasting. The study, last updated in December 2017, reportedly ranked Sonix.ai highest in terms of accuracy.

3. Call to Action:

The article concludes with a call to action, inviting readers to explore automated transcription by offering a free trial of Sonix.ai.

In summary, the article provides a comprehensive overview of the key considerations when choosing between automated and human transcription services. It underscores the trade-offs between speed, cost, and accuracy, ultimately leaving the decision to the reader's priorities and preferences. The mention of a specific service and the reference to an independent study lend credibility to the information presented, making it a valuable resource for individuals navigating the transcription landscape.