Terminology referring to people living without permanent housing changes frequently. Today, the term 'unhoused' is gaining ground among advocates. Why, and why does it matter?
TSViPhoto / Seeking human kindness.
This article is based on an interview with Dictionary.com Senior Director of Editorial John Kelly and Dictionary.com lexicographer Heather Bonikowski.
Throughout history, language has been ever-changing and fluid. Vocabulary comes and goes, evolving with cultural, social, and political shifts. In the last half century, we have seen a whole host of words morph from legal terms to euphemisms to, sometimes, downright slurs. As a word ages, it gains layers of meaning, both explicit and implicit, transforming it over time. According to Dictionary.com lexicographer Heather Bonikowski, this is a linguistic concept called the “euphemism treadmill,” in which a term originally meant to be the less offensive word gains negative baggage that creates a negative image around the term.
As such, society frequently updates language to eliminate insulting terminology, words that come with heavy connotational baggage, and exclusive language that ignores the experiences of minority or marginalized groups. We have seen this evolution unfold with language that relates to race, gender, sexual identity, disability, religion, addiction, mental health, and other topics that can marginalize and exclude certain groups. Dictionary.com Senior Director of Editorial John Kelly believes this points to a broader cultural mood shift. “It signals progress,” Kelly says, and a willingness to expand our circle of empathy to more groups that may not quite fit into mainstream American identity.
Recently, advocates and researchers have begun to question the usage of the term “homeless,” particularly when used as a collective noun (“the homeless”). While the term is still widely used—and in some cases, preferred—by community members and the media, some argue that the term dehumanizes the people experiencing homelessness and flattens their identity into one stigmatized characteristic.
In light of this discussion, Dictionary.com recently added ‘unhoused’ to their database as a unique term suitable for replacing ‘homeless.’ According to Kelly, acknowledging more inclusive terms like ‘unhoused’ and ‘unsheltered’ “can attend to an increasingly diverse set of experiences” and elevate the humanity of people experiencing homelessness rather than defining a large swath of the population by one temporary trait. Some advocates also prefer “people without homes” and ‘houseless’ as appropriate substitutes.
Furthermore, some unsheltered people resent the implication that they have no “home.” In some cases, people view a city or community as their home—whether or not they have a roof over their heads, rent housing, or own property there. The condition of being unsheltered denotes the lack of physical shelter, while ‘homeless’ may also imply the lack of permanent housing experienced by people living in cars, temporary shelters, or with friends.
In many cases, the use of the term ‘homeless’ carries baggage that brings with it connotations of personal failings, drug use, and other stigmatizing assumptions. When people reference “the homeless,” they often minimize the effect of social status, disability, and access to resources as crucial factors in how and why people become unhoused. According to Bonikowski, in media coverage and literature, words like ‘unhoused’ and ‘unsheltered’ are often used with more positive connotations than ‘homeless,’ such as referring to “unhoused neighbors.” Referring to people “experiencing homelessness” or being unhoused or unsheltered can imply a worldview that sees homelessness as a structural and societal failing, not a personal problem. In a search of the California Digital Newspaper Collection, ‘homeless’ made an appearance more than 95,000 times. Meanwhile, ‘unhoused’ and ‘unsheltered’ were used a total of roughly 1,500 times. New terms like these often come from specialized fields—in this case housing advocacy—and make their way into the mainstream. Changing the language can help shed longstanding stigmas and encourage people to view marginalized groups with more empathy. As Bonikowski puts it, there are three people in every conversation: the speaker, the person being spoken about, and the person being spoken to. Too often in conversations about homelessness, the person being spoken about is absent from the room.
Today, the issue of homelessness has been thrust into the public eye more than ever as more and more people experience housing insecurity. In a way, says Kelly, social forces have made the issue more visible and more relatable as more Americans see their own financial situation become more precarious. Today, more people than ever fear falling into homelessness themselves, or have friends or family who are unhoused. In August 2021, almost half of adult renters surveyed by the Census Bureau said they were “very likely” or “somewhat likely” to be evicted in the next two months. In the same survey, 14 percent of renters were behind on rent payments. According to the Department of Housing and Urban Development, “The number of sheltered individuals with chronic patterns of homelessness increased by 20 percent between 2020 and 2021.”
Thanks in part to these unfortunate trends, many Americans now have a different level of empathy for people in dire economic conditions, and changes in language can serve as a barometer for social concerns. Kelly acknowledges that “these debates are hard, confusing, and weaponized.” But they are also “an indication that, in our language, we’re attending to a broader array of people who have been historically marginalized.”
[Updated July 6, 2022 to correct John Kelly's title. He is Senior Director of Editorial at Dictionary.com.]
Diana is a writer and urbanist passionate about public space, historical memory, and transportation equity. Prior to joining Planetizen, she started and managed a farmers' market and worked as a transportation planner in the bike share industry. She is Planetizen's editor as of January 2022.
Stay up to date with the latest news, jobs, and more.
Related
Los Angeles Tightens Restrictions on Encampments
During a city council meeting that had to pause while police cleared the room of activists opposing the measure, the council voted to ban public sleeping within 500 feet of schools, making one-fifth of city sidewalks off-limits to unhoused people.
August 9, 2022 - Los Angeles Times
Understanding Mortality Risks Among Unhoused People
How tracking housing status at time of death can help policymakers identify when people are most vulnerable.
December 11, 2023 - Maine Morning Star
Palo Alto Expands Church ‘Safe Parking’ Program
The city is considering adding commercial lots to the program, which provides safe parking and amenities for people living in cars.
December 6, 2023 - ABC 7 News
Most Read
NYC MTA Approves Congestion Pricing Details
The program, which calls for a $15 fee for most vehicles, requires a final MTA board vote in two months.
December 13, 2023 - Gothamist
NYC Tests New Subway Gates to Limit Fare Evasion
The mayor has taken a strong interest in enforcing fare collection at the city’s transit stations.
December 10, 2023 - Curbed
Where Are Millennials Moving to?
As the housing crisis rages on, four U.S. states are seeing high levels of new migration from young and middle-aged workers.
December 7, 2023 - Yahoo Finance
Latest News
Insurance Rates Rise Sharply for Affordable Housing
Increases of up to 104 percent in insurance rates are squeezing nonprofit affordable housing developers as rates rise around the country.
2 hours ago - Marketplace
Carbon Capture Plan Draws Conservationist Concerns
The Forest Service says storing carbon dioxide under national forest lands is essential to reducing greenhouse gas emissions and meeting climate goals.
3 hours ago - Grist
California Commission Rejects Highway Expansion Funding
The move to deny requested funds signals a shift in mindset away from rubber-stamping road projects.
4 hours ago - Streetsblog California
City of Bangor
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
"Rethinking Commuter Rail" podcast & Intercity Bus E-News
Chaddick Institute at DePaul University
RFP: Park City Comprehensive Update to the General Plan
Park City Municipal Corporation
RFP for A New Pennsylvania Avenue Plan Between the White House and U.S. Capitol
National Capital Planning Commission
Write for Planetizen
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
As an expert in linguistics and language evolution, I can provide valuable insights into the terminology changes discussed in the article. Language, as a dynamic entity, reflects societal shifts, and the choice of words can significantly impact our perception of various issues. The article delves into the evolving language used to describe people living without permanent housing, shedding light on the importance of these changes.
The term "euphemism treadmill," mentioned by Dictionary.com lexicographer Heather Bonikowski, is a well-established linguistic concept. It refers to the phenomenon where a word intended to be less offensive gradually accumulates negative connotations over time, leading to the need for constant linguistic updates. This treadmill effect is observed in the context of terminology related to race, gender, sexual identity, disability, religion, addiction, mental health, and now, homelessness.
The article highlights the shift from the term "homeless" to more inclusive alternatives like "unhoused" and "unsheltered." The rationale behind this change is to avoid dehumanizing individuals and to capture a broader range of experiences within the homeless population. The use of terms like "people without homes" and "houseless" also emphasizes the need for language that respects the dignity and diverse circ*mstances of those experiencing homelessness.
Moreover, the distinction between "unsheltered" and "homeless" is significant, as it acknowledges that one can have a sense of home or belonging in a city or community despite lacking physical shelter. This nuance challenges preconceived notions and encourages a more empathetic understanding of the complex issues surrounding homelessness.
The article provides evidence for the societal impact of language changes by citing Dictionary.com's decision to add 'unhoused' to their database as a distinct term. This move reflects a broader cultural shift, signaling progress and a willingness to expand empathy towards marginalized groups.
The use of specific terms, such as 'unhoused' and 'unsheltered,' is also highlighted for its positive connotations compared to the stigmatizing assumptions associated with 'homeless.' Media coverage and literature contribute to shaping public perception, and the article suggests that adopting more positive language can help combat longstanding stigmas and foster a more compassionate worldview.
In conclusion, the article underscores the importance of language in shaping societal attitudes toward homelessness. Changes in terminology, as advocated by linguists and experts, can contribute to a more empathetic and nuanced understanding of the challenges faced by individuals without permanent housing.