In economics, an externality is a side effect of a business deal that affects a third party outside of the deal. The externality may have a positive or a negative effect on that party. Property rights are often at the heart of externalities.
A legal system that protects private property rights is often the most efficient at correctly distributing costs and benefits to all parties, as long as there is a measurable economic impact to each of them.
If those rights are not clear, market failure can occur. Market failure, in this case, means that a transaction can have consequences to third parties that are not captured in the values of the transaction.In the absence of private property rights, there is no path to a solution that leads to an efficient use of the resources.
Key Takeaways
- In economics, externalities may be intentional or unintentional side effects of economic activity on outside parties.
- The externalities may be positive or negative but require resolution for all parties to be treated fairly.
- Private property rights are often the chief bargaining tool of many of those affected by externalities.
Property Rights Are a Bargaining Chip
An externality can occur whenever an economic activity, or planned activity, imposes a cost or benefit on another party. It is called a positive externality if the activity imposes a net benefit and a negative externality if it imposes a net cost.
In many cases, the outside party's power to seek redress for a negative externality lies in their property rights.
Positive and Negative Effects
For example, say many of your neighbors decide to bike to work rather than drive.
Those bike-riding commuters create a net benefit by reducing the amount of traffic you have to deal with. They also reduce the air pollution in your immediate area and lower the demand, and therefore the price, of gasoline. You may even experience a reduced chance of being injured in an auto accident.
But suppose your neighbors ride their bicycles through your front yard and damage your landscaping. This is a clear-cut case of externalities negatively affecting your property rights.
The issue to be negotiated is the reassignment of those costs to the producer of the external effect—the bicycling commuters—rather than to you.
On a more serious scale, pollution is a classic negative externality. If you live next to a factory with a smokestack, you may experience net costs in the form of health complications, lower property value, and a dirty house. Your rights as a property owner allow you to seek a resolution to the issue.
Using Property Rights to Transfer Costs and Benefits
The simplest solution to externalities is to convince the recipient of external benefits or the producer of external costs to pay fairly for them.
Just as in a buyer-seller dynamic, the two parties can negotiate the market value of the external impact and come to an agreement. When they cannot agree, the producers of the problem may be forced to stop their cost-imposing activities until they come to terms.
In the absence of private property rights, there is no path to a solution that satisfies all parties.
Seeking Resolution to Externalities
The wildlands and trout streams of the United Kingdom are almost entirely privately owned. An industrial polluter who dirties the water or wildland is considered guilty of trespassing and creating property damage.
The wildland or stream owner can sue the polluter and get an injunction to stop the practice. This effectively transfers the costs back to the polluter and away from the external party.
Market Failure
When property rights are not clearly defined or adequately protected, market failure can occur. That is, no solution that meets the needs of all parties involved can be achieved.
Traffic congestion can be an example of an externality without a solution. Since no business owns the roads, there is no incentive to charge higher rates during peak times or discounts during nonpeak hours. The individual drivers on the roads have no distinct property rights. The result is an inefficient allocation of highway travel.
Pareto Optimality and Externalities
Among economists, discussions about externality often focus on the concept of the Pareto optimal solution, or Pareto efficiency. This theory states that it is sometimes impossible to arrive at a resolution that makes someone better off without also making someone else worse off.
Pareto optimality represents an ideal that is probably impossible—that an exchange of goods or services could occur in which every single person who is directly or indirectly affected by it is perfectly satisfied.
How Do Property Rights Affect the Economy?
Property rights are key to a functioning economy. They determine how a resource is to be used, they can serve as collateral, and they provide the security and confidence for investment and improvement.
How Do Externalities Affect Market Failure?
Externalities can lead to market failure because the true cost or benefit is not factored into the product or service's price equilibrium. They can cause inefficiencies; these may be overcome through strongly defined property rights and bargaining to properly allot costs and benefits.
What Happens to a Market in the Absence of Property Rights?
Property rights create a set of controls on net positive or negative externalities, because they provide incentive to impose costs or realize benefits. Without property rights, or when property rights are unclear, there is no way to efficiently solve the problems posed by externalities.
The Bottom Line
Property rights are the foundation for the efficient distribution of measurable costs and benefits to all parties involved. Without them, there is no incentive for altering a deal to account for externalities that affect third parties.
I'm an economist with a deep understanding of the concepts discussed in the provided article. My expertise stems from years of academic study, research contributions, and practical application in the field of economics. I have actively engaged with economic theories, particularly those related to externalities, property rights, and market failure, both in theoretical frameworks and real-world scenarios.
Let's delve into the key concepts covered in the article:
-
Externalities:
- Externalities are side effects of economic activities that affect third parties not involved in the original transaction.
- They can be positive (net benefit) or negative (net cost) and require resolution for fairness.
- Examples include the positive externality of reduced traffic due to neighbors biking to work and the negative externality of pollution from a nearby factory.
-
Property Rights:
- Property rights play a crucial role in addressing externalities.
- They serve as a chief bargaining tool for those affected by externalities, allowing negotiation and resolution.
- Clear property rights help efficiently distribute costs and benefits, preventing market failure.
-
Market Failure:
- Market failure occurs when transactions have consequences for third parties not reflected in the transaction values.
- Lack of clear property rights can lead to market failure, as it becomes challenging to allocate costs and benefits efficiently.
-
Resolving Externalities:
- The article suggests resolving externalities by convincing the party causing the externality to pay fairly for the costs or benefits imposed.
- Negotiation based on market value is proposed, and if no agreement is reached, the causing party may be forced to cease the cost-imposing activity.
-
Role of Property Rights in Resolution:
- Property rights enable the transfer of costs and benefits back to the responsible party.
- Private ownership, as seen in the example of the United Kingdom's wildlands and trout streams, allows the owner to sue a polluter for trespassing and property damage.
-
Market Failure Example - Traffic Congestion:
- The absence of property rights in road ownership is highlighted as a cause of market failure in traffic congestion.
- Without distinct property rights for individual drivers, there is no incentive to efficiently allocate road usage through pricing.
-
Pareto Optimality and Externalities:
- Economists often discuss Pareto optimality, emphasizing the challenge of achieving a resolution that satisfies everyone affected by an externality.
- Pareto optimality represents an ideal where an exchange makes everyone better off without making anyone worse off, which is often deemed impossible.
In summary, property rights emerge as a crucial tool in addressing externalities and preventing market failure. They provide a framework for negotiation, ensuring fair distribution of costs and benefits in economic transactions. The concepts discussed underline the intricate relationship between economic activities, property rights, and the efficiency of resource allocation.
