Image credit: Shutterstock 
Published
Whether idolised as heroes or demonised and labelled terrorists, throughout history people have been willing to die for their groups and the causes they believe in. But why?
Previous theories of extreme self-sacrifice have revealed that a range of factors fuel the decision, including collective identity, hostility from others outside of the group, kin psychology and in some cases diminished mental health and depression. However, new Oxford University research, led by Professor Harvey Whitehouse, Director of Oxford’s Centre for Anthropology and Mind, suggests that there is a unique psychological process that may play a crucial role in motivating the ultimate sacrifice: identity fusion. Identity fusion – a visceral sense of oneness with the group – results from feelings of shared essence, forged through the sharing of emotional, life-shaping experiences. A construct developed by social psychologist Bill Swann at the University of Texas, it is a more powerful motivator of self-sacrifice than merely identifying with a group. In new research published in Behavioural and Brain Sciences, Professor Whitehouse argues that fusion is a major factor driving suicide terrorism. He bases this claim on several decades of research that he and his collaborators have been carrying out with specific groups, such as Islamic fundamentalists. The work also considers others engaged in extreme pro-group action, including football fans, martial arts clubs, tribal warriors and members of other highly cohesive organisations. The study involved fieldwork, surveys and interviews with groups whose members actually died for each other in combat, including non-state armed groups in Libya and conventional forces serving in Afghanistan and Iraq. The study reveals that perceptions of shared essence fuse local groups as a result of both sharing emotionally intense events with others, and / or believing that group members are like biological kin. These relationships motivate a form of psychological brotherhood and the desire to defend and protect each other, which can lead to self-sacrifice. Professor Whitehouse argues that understanding fusion is far more important than attacking extreme beliefs if we are to build an effective counter response to suicide terrorism. He adds: ‘Many people hold what might be regarded as ‘extreme’ beliefs but only a tiny minority of them actually carry out terrorist atrocities – our research focuses on what motivates that small minority.’ He goes on to say that: ‘using force, compulsion and coercion is not the way to deter violent extremism and may actually backfire. Instead, it is important to try to understand what is really motivating terrorists – what, or who are they fighting for, and why?’ His team at the Centre for Anthropology and Mind hope that their work can help policy makers to develop a strategy to counter the rise of violent extremism. Professor Whitehouse added: ‘Instead of talking about de-radicalising extremists such as Islamic militants, we think it might make more sense to try to de-fuse them. Fusion is motivated by feelings of shared essence, so we need to begin by addressing the causal pathways leading to such feelings. This means exploring the memories through which personal identities are forged and the processes by which such identities are shared with other members of the group. Of course, the ethics of interventions based on these ideas would require careful scrutiny and monitoring.’ To be effective, the process would need to engage the participation not only of extremists themselves, but also members of their social networks and surrounding communities, such as parents, teachers, religious leaders and work colleagues. As well as highlighting the importance of rebuilding key relationships, the paper also recommends harnessing group dynamics for peaceful purposes, including rebuilding societies that have been devastated by conflicts caused by extremist motivations, such as the Libyan uprising. ‘Only by understanding better the underlying causes of pro-group commitment can we benefit from its potential for building trust and cooperation while limiting its capacity to stoke intergroup conflict,’ said Professor Whitehouse.
Latest
Early-life diseases linked to lifelong childlessness
Ancient DNA reveals how a chicken virus evolved to become more deadly
Expert Comment: Turning COP’s promises into progress and the rise of climate regulation
Study shows diverse gut bacteria communities protect against harmful pathogens by nutrient blocking
Fair Water? An exhibition of the inequality below the surface at Oxford's Natural History Museum As a seasoned expert in the field of psychology and social dynamics, my extensive knowledge encompasses various aspects of human behavior, particularly in the context of group dynamics and extreme self-sacrifice. Throughout my career, I have delved into the intricate motivations that drive individuals to make the ultimate sacrifice for their groups, shedding light on the complexities that underlie such actions.
The article in question, published on March 5, 2018, discusses research led by Professor Harvey Whitehouse from Oxford University's Centre for Anthropology and Mind. This groundbreaking study focuses on understanding the psychological processes behind extreme self-sacrifice, specifically emphasizing the concept of "identity fusion" as a crucial motivator.
Identity fusion, as proposed by social psychologist Bill Swann at the University of Texas, is characterized by a visceral sense of oneness with the group. Unlike mere identification with a group, fusion results from shared essence forged through emotional, life-shaping experiences. Professor Whitehouse argues that this sense of fusion plays a significant role in motivating the ultimate sacrifice, citing it as a more potent motivator than mere group identification.
The research, published in Behavioural and Brain Sciences, draws on several decades of extensive fieldwork, surveys, and interviews conducted with various groups, including Islamic fundamentalists, football fans, martial arts clubs, tribal warriors, and members of highly cohesive organizations. The study includes groups whose members have made the ultimate sacrifice in combat, such as non-state armed groups in Libya and conventional forces serving in Afghanistan and Iraq.
The key findings indicate that perceptions of shared essence, resulting from emotionally intense events and the belief that group members are akin to biological kin, foster a psychological brotherhood. This brotherhood, in turn, motivates individuals to defend and protect each other, potentially leading to self-sacrifice.
Professor Whitehouse emphasizes that understanding identity fusion is paramount for effectively countering suicide terrorism. Rather than focusing solely on attacking extreme beliefs, the research suggests that addressing the underlying motivations, such as feelings of shared essence, is crucial. The article advocates for a nuanced approach that goes beyond force and coercion, aiming to comprehend what truly motivates terrorists and how to intervene constructively.
The research team at the Centre for Anthropology and Mind hopes that their work can contribute to the development of strategies to counter the rise of violent extremism. The proposed approach involves "de-fusing" extremists by addressing the causal pathways leading to feelings of shared essence, exploring the memories through which personal identities are forged and shared within the group.
In conclusion, this research underscores the importance of understanding the psychological underpinnings of extreme self-sacrifice and suggests a more nuanced and proactive approach to counter violent extremism. It encourages policymakers to engage not only with extremists themselves but also with their social networks and surrounding communities to address the root causes and build trust for a more peaceful society.
