Bystander Intervention: Making a Positive Impact on a Negative Situation (2024)

May 13, 2019

TwitterFacebook

Bystander Intervention: Making a Positive Impact on a Negative Situation (1)After the 2016 election, Dean Sandro Galea called an all-school assembly to discuss what this election and new presidency meant for our communities, our nation, and the field of public health. Many people in attendance spoke up and expressed a sense of fear and vulnerability. With this unease in the air, Dr. Craig Ross, a research assistant professor in the epidemiology department, and Elizabeth Henehan, a research analyst in the epidemiology department, spoke up and encouraged the school to come together as a community to support each other. “I have your back,” Ross said. Ross approached Dean Galea, who was very supportive of this idea, and the seeds for campus-wide bystander intervention trainings were planted.

Fast forward to Fall 2018 and all incoming students at BUSPH participated in bystander intervention training as a part of their required Leadership and Management course. Based on training provided byHollaback, an organization focused on ending public harassment, this training teaches students how to be active bystanders. It equips them with the tools to recognize a problematic situation and respond both intelligently and compassionately, without throwing anger back at anger.

The bystander intervention training at BUSPH centers on the idea that teaching people very basic skills to creatively deescalate situations of public harassment is beneficial to community health. These skills are known in this work as the 5 D’s: direct, delay, distract, document, and delegate. Direct means to step in and intervene directly, while delay means to check in with the person who was targeted after the fact. Distract means to take attention away from the situation, and document means to record events in case the targeted person would like to use them as evidence. Finally, delegate means to tell someone of a higher power, such as a store manager or a bus driver, about the situation so they will use their authority to intervene. A key component of this training is that it teaches students that they can be a hero in many ways. With a little creativity, kindness, and strategic thinking they can make a positive impact on a negative situation and have each other’s back.

“When you are taught a couple of key skills you can use, people are more likely to intervene in situations of harassment, and they are more likely to intervene in a way that is helpful,” says Henehan, who is working to train students at BUSPH.

The impacts of these trainings are not only seen across the BUMC campus, though. Through word-of-mouth, various organizations in the surrounding community have reached out to Ross and Henehan about bringing bystander intervention trainings to their organization. With the help of Greg Cohen from the Epidemiology Department, these trainings have expanded to organizations in the community, and Ross and his team are providing people with the tools to transform their communities. So far, nine trainings have taken place in the community with over 100 people trained in bystander intervention, and these numbers are growing. As more and more people are empowered by this training, they feel other people should have these tools available to them, as well.

“Part of my interest in expanding beyond BUSPH,” says Ross, “was that we should be giving our community an opportunity to go out in the broader world and represent what public health means and how it translates into action.”

Some of the community groups and religious institutions that have been trained in bystander intervention include the Wellesley Democratic Town Committee, Christ Lutheran Church in Natick, Temple Beth Shalom in Needham, Needham First Parish Church, and North Hill of Needham.

As interest in bystander intervention training continues to grow, as does the need to train faculty, staff, and students to conduct these trainings both on campus and in the community. A group of BUSPH students have gone through the training and are now both members of the training team and research assistants for Ross and Henehan, assisting in developing and adapting the trainings based on trainee feedback moving forward.

“A lot of what we discuss in the trainings is how our own identity can influence our perspectives on being a bystander,” says Caroline Ezekwesili, one of the students on the training team. “You have to be aware of yourself and understand how you orient yourself in public to successfully intervene as a bystander and do this work.”

“The general person just really doesn’t know what to do when situations of public harassment arise,” add Hithu Kodicherla and Maya Adler, who are also students on the training team. “Giving them the skills to help people in the moment will help to build more trusting, accountable communities that can focus on policing themselves rather than being policed by outside sources that may not always be welcome.”

Adler assisted in facilitating a training at Temple Beth Shalom in Needham earlier this semester.

Ross, Henehan, Cohen, Mahogany Price from Graduate Student Life and their team in-training have seen a lot of school-wide support for the work they are doing in bystander intervention and hope to continue to grow and expand their training program across the Boston University campus and beyond.

“It is encouraging that BUSPH is a community that cares about these issues,” says Henehan. “I think this speaks highly of BUSPH and its commitment to address social determinants of health. It signals clearly that this school intends to train dynamic leaders for the future of public health.”

For more information about the broader impacts of bystander intervention, please visit Hollaback’s website. For more information about the bystander intervention trainings on the BUMC campus, please visit our website.

Mallory Bersi

Explore Related Topics:

  • activist lab
  • bystander intervention
  • public harassment
  • sexual harassment
  • student news
  • training
  • 0CommentsAdd

As an expert in public health and community well-being, I can attest to the significance of bystander intervention in fostering a safe and supportive environment. The article dated May 13, 2019, sheds light on the proactive measures taken by the Boston University School of Public Health (BUSPH) to address concerns arising after the 2016 election and the subsequent establishment of a new presidency. Dr. Craig Ross, a research assistant professor, and Elizabeth Henehan, a research analyst, played pivotal roles in initiating campus-wide bystander intervention trainings.

The basis for these trainings lies in the recognition that public harassment can negatively impact community health. Drawing from the expertise of Hollaback, an organization dedicated to ending public harassment, the training provided to BUSPH students focuses on equipping them with essential skills to intervene intelligently and compassionately in problematic situations. This approach aligns with the concept of active bystanders, individuals who play a crucial role in deescalating situations and supporting those who are targeted.

The training, as outlined in the article, revolves around the "5 D's": direct, delay, distract, document, and delegate. These strategies empower individuals to respond effectively to incidents of harassment. Direct intervention involves stepping in to address the situation, while delay encourages checking in with the targeted person afterward. Distracting from the situation, documenting events for potential evidence, and delegating to higher authorities are other key components of the training.

Noteworthy is the expansion of these bystander intervention trainings beyond the BUSPH campus to various community organizations. Under the guidance of Greg Cohen from the Epidemiology Department, these trainings have reached diverse groups, including the Wellesley Democratic Town Committee, Christ Lutheran Church in Natick, Temple Beth Shalom in Needham, Needham First Parish Church, and North Hill of Needham. The positive impact is evident, with over 100 people trained in bystander intervention, and growing interest from the community.

The involvement of BUSPH students in the training process, as both members of the training team and research assistants, highlights the commitment to sustainability and ongoing improvement. By incorporating feedback from trainees, the program adapts to evolving needs, ensuring its effectiveness in diverse settings.

In conclusion, the article showcases the success of bystander intervention training at BUSPH and its positive ripple effects in the broader community. It emphasizes the importance of proactive engagement in addressing social determinants of health and building trusting, accountable communities. The commitment to expanding these initiatives across the Boston University campus and beyond reflects the school's dedication to training dynamic leaders for the future of public health. For those interested in further exploration, additional information about the broader impacts of bystander intervention can be found on Hollaback's website.

Bystander Intervention: Making a Positive Impact on a Negative Situation (2024)

FAQs

What are the 5 approaches of bystander intervention is best for all situations? ›

The 5Ds are different methods – Distract, Delegate, Document, Delay, and Direct – that you can use to support someone who's being harassed, emphasize that harassment is not okay, and demonstrate to people in your life that they have the power to make their community safer. Anyone can use the 5Ds!

How does bystander intervention help? ›

Bystander Intervention involves developing the awareness, skills, and courage needed to intervene in a situation when another individual needs help. Bystander interventions allow individuals to send powerful messages about what is acceptable and expected behavior in our community.

What bystander intervention process step requires a bystander to do more than just react to negative acts or negative behavior? ›

Explanation: The bystander intervention process step that requires a bystander to do more than just react to negative acts or negative behavior is Step 3 - Feel responsible for solving it.

What is an example of bystander intervention? ›

For example, if you see someone on the street being verbally harassed, you can interrupt the harasser and ask them for directions. You can also intervene by pretending to know the person being harassed and starting a conversation with them as an opportunity to come between them and the harasser.

What are the 4 types of bystander intervention? ›

How You Can Intervene Safely: When it comes to intervening safely, remember the four Ds – direct, distract, delegate, delay. Call out negative behaviour, tell the person to stop or ask the victim if they are OK.

What are the 5 stages of intervention? ›

The five major steps to intervention are the "5 A's": Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist, and Arrange. Ask - Identify and document tobacco use status for every patient at every visit.

How can the bystander effect be positive? ›

A positive bystander is someone who notices a potentially harmful or dangerous situation and intervenes. While it is only the responsibility of the perpetrator to not rape or sexually abuse people, bystanders can sometimes prevent harmful or dangerous situations from happening.

What are the positive effects of bystander effect? ›

The positive bystander effect: passive bystanders increase helping in situations with high expected negative consequences for the helper.

What three things must happen for a bystander to intervene? ›

First, a person must notice the event. Second, they must interpret it as a situation that needs intervention. Third, they must assume responsibility to intervene.

Should bystanders intervene when there is trouble? ›

Everyone has a duty and responsibility to intervene if they see harm occurring or about to occur. Bystanders are anyone in the community that sees or hears about a behavior that could lead to something harmful. Through their action, bystanders have the ability to prevent harm from happening.

What is the negative bystander effect? ›

The bystander effect occurs when the presence of others discourages an individual from intervening in an emergency situation, against a bully, or during an assault or other crime. The greater the number of bystanders, the less likely it is for any one of them to provide help to a person in distress.

When should the bystander effect be strongest? ›

Bystanders are more likely to intervene in low ambiguity, insignificant consequence situations than in high ambiguity, significant consequence situations.

How do you intervene in bystander intervention? ›

Practicing Active Bystander Intervention
  1. Create a Distraction. Distracting is a subtle and innovative way of intervening. ...
  2. Ask Directly. Asking directly to the individual at risk can help you determine if an action needs to be taken immediately to ensure a safe environment. ...
  3. Rally Others. ...
  4. Extend Support. ...
  5. Your Actions Matter.

What is probably the most famous example of the bystander effect? ›

The most frequently cited example of the bystander effect in introductory psychology textbooks is the brutal murder of a young woman named Catherine "Kitty" ​Genovese. On Friday, March 13, 1964, 28-year-old Genovese was returning home from work.

What is an everyday example of the bystander effect? ›

Some modern-day examples of the bystander effect include instances where no one intervenes during cyberbullying incidents, crowds who record fights rather than report or stop them, and when passersby ignore someone who is on the ground.

What are the 5 stages of the bystander effect? ›

Bystander Intervention teaches five basic steps:
  • Notice the event.
  • Interpret the situation as a problem.
  • Assume personal responsibility.
  • Know how to help.
  • Step up!
Aug 25, 2023

What is the best way for a bystander to intervene? ›

Bystander Intervention
  1. Direct: Intervene directly. By intervening in the moment, bystanders may give the concerned person a chance to get to a safe place or leave a situation (View a video example here)
  2. Distract: Distract either party.
  3. Delegate: Bring in someone else to help.
  4. Delay: Check in later.

What are the 5 D's of being an active bystander? ›

Distraction | Direct Action | Delegation | Delay | Document

We are not looking for people to step into every situation, but stepping up when and where you can. There are many ways to intervene - bystander intervention does not have to be direct or loud.

What are the effective active bystander strategies? ›

Practicing Active Bystander Intervention
  • Create a Distraction. Distracting is a subtle and innovative way of intervening. ...
  • Ask Directly. Asking directly to the individual at risk can help you determine if an action needs to be taken immediately to ensure a safe environment. ...
  • Rally Others. ...
  • Extend Support. ...
  • Your Actions Matter.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Laurine Ryan

Last Updated:

Views: 5545

Rating: 4.7 / 5 (77 voted)

Reviews: 92% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Laurine Ryan

Birthday: 1994-12-23

Address: Suite 751 871 Lissette Throughway, West Kittie, NH 41603

Phone: +2366831109631

Job: Sales Producer

Hobby: Creative writing, Motor sports, Do it yourself, Skateboarding, Coffee roasting, Calligraphy, Stand-up comedy

Introduction: My name is Laurine Ryan, I am a adorable, fair, graceful, spotless, gorgeous, homely, cooperative person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.