Please help us improve our site!
No thank you
(a) A document of title is negotiable if by its terms the goods are to be delivered to bearer or to the order of a named person.
(b) A document of title other than one described in subsection (a) is nonnegotiable. A bill of lading that states that the goods are consigned to a named person is not made negotiable by a provision that the goods are to be delivered only against an order in a record signed by the same or another named person.
(c) A document of title is nonnegotiable if, at the time it is issued, the document has a conspicuous legend, however expressed, that it is nonnegotiable.
As a seasoned expert in commercial law, particularly in the realm of negotiable instruments and documents of title, my knowledge is grounded in both theoretical understanding and practical application. I have a comprehensive grasp of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) and its various articles, with a focus on Article 7 that specifically addresses documents of title.
In the context of negotiable instruments, I'll delve into the concepts outlined in the provided excerpt from § 7-103 of the UCC:
(a) Negotiability of a Document of Title: A document of title is deemed negotiable if, as per its explicit terms, the goods it represents are to be delivered either to the bearer or to the order of a named person. This condition establishes the transferability and negotiability of the document, a critical aspect in commercial transactions.
(b) Nonnegotiability of Other Documents of Title: Contrarily, documents of title falling outside the criteria mentioned in subsection (a) are deemed nonnegotiable. For instance, a bill of lading indicating that the goods are consigned to a specific individual does not become negotiable simply because there's a provision stating that delivery is contingent upon an order recorded and signed by the same or another named person.
(c) Nonnegotiability Due to Conspicuous Legend: Furthermore, a document of title is categorized as nonnegotiable if, at the time of its issuance, it bears a conspicuous legend, expressed in any clear manner, explicitly declaring its nonnegotiable nature. This provision emphasizes the importance of transparency and clarity in distinguishing negotiable from nonnegotiable instruments.
Additionally, it's worth noting that the provided text includes a reference to § 7-105, which pertains to the reissuance of documents of title in an alternative medium. This section underscores the adaptability of the UCC to evolving technologies and practices, allowing for the reissuance of documents in alternative forms without compromising their legal efficacy.
In essence, the excerpt from § 7-103 of the UCC establishes the criteria for negotiability and nonnegotiability of documents of title, shedding light on the intricacies of commercial transactions and the legal framework that governs them.
