What are the advantages and disadvantages of the bottom-up approach?
...
Research Links.
| News | Videos | Presentations |
|---|---|---|
| Books | Academic | More |
A bottom-up approach can help change that. Projects or ideas are collaboratively decided on, and employees will feel more closely aligned with the company strategy and their supervisors' expectations. This means they can go ahead and execute, confident that their work provides value to their team and company.
While a bottom-up approach allows decisions to be made by the same people who are working directly on a project, the top-down style of management creates distance between that team and decision-makers. This can lead to poorly-informed decisions if leadership doesn't ask for input or feedback from their project team.
Only advantage with application of Bottom-up methods in nano-technology is that it enables devices to create automatically through self assembly and work in parallel, therefore are considerably cheaper than Top-down methods.
Cons of bottom-up management
“Employees who prefer not to think about how they work or the opportunities they can create for themselves often struggle with empowerment. They may lack direction and focus. They may not be achievement-oriented, making it harder for them to get motivated intrinsically.”
Disadvantages of the bottom-up approach include: Complexity (making a decision with just a few people is more simple). Time-consuming (making a decision with just a few people will typically be faster).
Disadvantages. Top-down project planning has one big disadvantage: Because the team is not involved in the project planning, they might feel left out and as if they can't voice their opinions. Furthermore, the prerequisite for top-down projects planning to work is that communication is clear.
Each approach can be quite simple—the top-down approach goes from the general to the specific, and the bottom-up approach begins at the specific and moves to the general. These methods are possible approaches for a wide range of endeavors, such as goal setting, budgeting, and forecasting.
A bottom-up approach is the piecing together of systems to give rise to more complex systems, thus making the original systems sub-systems of the emergent system. Bottom-up processing is a type of information processing based on incoming data from the environment to form a perception.
Bottom-up, or self-assembly, approaches to nanofabrication use chemical or physical forces operating at the nanoscale to assemble basic units into larger structures. As component size decreases in nanofabrication, bottom-up approaches provide an increasingly important complement to top-down techniques.
Which of the following is an example of bottom-up approach?
Which of the following is an example of Bottom Up approach? Explanation: Colloidal dispersion is an example of bottom up approach in the synthesis of Nano particles. Attrition, milling and etching are typical top down methods.
Top-down approaches are good for producing structures with long-range order and for making macroscopic connections, while bottom-up approaches are best suited for assembly and establishing short-range order at nanoscale dimensions.
The bottom-up budgeting process allows employees to own the process since they are familiar with the expenditures at the departmental levels. They will also be motivated to work hard since they feel that their input in the organization is valued by the management.
Generally, the bottom-up approach focuses its analysis on specific characteristics and micro attributes of an individual stock. In bottom-up investing concentration is on business-by-business or sector-by-sector fundamentals.
A bottom-up approach emphasizes the fact that those who are out “in the field” every day can provide significant insights that management, from their perspective a bit higher up, might fail to notice. With this approach, organizations can also lessen the risk of surprising teams with any unexpected tasks or processes.
bottom-up development An approach to program development in which progress is made by composition of available elements, beginning with the primitive elements provided by the implementation language and ending when the desired program is reached.
