Imagine you owned or ran a large company that was making a lot of money. However, instead of seeing all of that money count as profit, you were watching a large portion of it being taken due to the United States bloated corporate tax code. Then imagine that you discovered a legal and relatively simple way to save a bunch of money on your tax bill. What would you do? You would probably jump on board, right?
More to the Story
Before you say yes, there’s more to this story. What would you do if you found out that even though your tax savings plan was legal there were still plenty of people who didn’t like what you were going to do? In fact, suppose the president of the United States was even against it and that he and other lawmakers began lobbying for ways to stop it; what would you do then? Of course, this is not a hypothetical situation at all. More U.S. based companies are considering tax inversions, the practice whereby a company switches its headquarters to a foreign country, on paper, in order to avoid the large corporate tax bills that are so common in America.
The Line Is Getting Longer
In fact, according to reports, several companies are ready to make the move now, including AbbVie and Shire, Applied Materials, Horizon Pharma, Medtronic, and Chiquita Brands. As these deals appear to be increasing and with more companies getting in line to take advantage of them, the blame game is also starting to get more interesting, as it seems that no one is immune to taking the heat.
The Blame Game Heats Up
Most recently, President Obama held a news conference early this month in which he discussed these tax inversion deals. So to whom do you think the president aimed his ire? It wasn’t the companies themselves, or their corporate tax lawyers. No, instead he blamed the accountants. Yep, this is what President Obama had to say:
“You have accountants going to some big corporations — multinational corporations but that are clearly U.S.-based and have the bulk of their operations in the United States — and these accountants are saying, you know what, we found a great loophole — if you just flip your citizenship to another country, even though it’s just a paper transaction, we think we can get you out of paying a whole bunch of taxes. Well, it’s not fair. It’s not right.”
Doing Their Job
These tax inversion deals are not illegal and of course, it’s these accountants’ job to help the companies they work for save as much money as they can. So is it really right to blame accountants for these deals? After all, if the companies themselves weren’t lining up to make these moves, would the accountants be helping them do so? Maybe, just maybe, there are other forces at work here that need to take some of the blame. Namely, the U.S. corporate tax code, which at about 35 percent is the highest among the developed world.
Looking for “Strategies for reducing tax“?
Tax Reform Could Make a Difference
Even though lawmakers and other government officials like to point the blame for these deals elsewhere, whether it’s the companies, their accountants or their tax lawyers, perhaps the root of the problem is actually the lack of real tax reform. By focusing on rewriting the corporate tax code, lawmakers could ease the burden on companies and thus make these deals rather pointless. However, until there is real tax code reform, the debate, and the blame game is sure to rage on.
Are you a Corporate, Estate and Trust, Individual, Limited Liability Company, Not for Profit, Partnership, and S Corporation income tax areas &
Looking for?
We hope you found this article about “Who is to Blame for USA Companies Leaving the Country for Lower Taxes?” helpful. If you have questions or need expert tax orfamily officeadvice that’s refreshingly objective (we never sell investments), pleasecontact usor visit ourFamily office pageor our website atwww.GROCO.com. Unfortunately, we no longer give advice to other tax professionals gratis.
To receive ourfree newsletter, contact ushere.
Subscribe ourYouTubeChannel for more updates.
Alan Olsen, is the Host of the American Dreams Show and the Managing Partner ofGROCO.com. GROCO is a premier family office and tax advisory firm located in the San Francisco Bay area serving clients all over the world.
Alan L. Olsen, CPA,Wikipedia Bio
GROCO.comis a proud sponsor of The American Dreams Show.
The American Dreams show was the brainchild of Alan Olsen, CPA, MBA. It was originally created to fill a specific need; often inexperienced entrepreneurs lacked basic information about raising capital and how to successfully start a business.
Alan sincerely wanted to respond to the many requests from aspiring entrepreneurs asking for the information and introductions they needed. But he had to find a way to help in which his venture capital clients and friends would not mind.
The American Dreams show became the solution, first as a radio show and now with YouTube videos as well. Always respectful of interview guest’s time, he’s able to give access to individuals information and inspiration previously inaccessible to the first-timeentrepreneurswho need it most.
They can listen to venture capitalists and successful business people explain first-hand, how they got to where they are, how to start a company, how to overcome challenges, how they see the future evolving, opportunities, work-life balance and so much more..
American Dreams discusses many topics from some of the world’s most successful individuals about their secrets to life’s success. Topics from guest have included:
Creating purpose in life / Building a foundation for their life / Solving problems / Finding fulfillment through philanthropy and service / Becoming self-reliant / Enhancing effective leadership / Balancing family and work…
MyPaths.com(Also sponsored by GROCO) provides free access to content and world-class entrepreneurs, influencers and thought leaders’ personal success stories. To help you find your path in life to true, sustainable success & happiness. It’s mission statement:
In an increasingly complex and difficult world, we hope to help you find your personal path in life and build a strong foundation by learning how others found success and happiness. True and sustainable success and happiness are different for each one of us but possible, often despite significant challenges.
Our mission at MyPaths.com is to provide resources and firsthand accounts of how others found their paths in life, so you can do the same.
As a seasoned expert in tax and corporate finance, I have a comprehensive understanding of the intricate dynamics at play in the realm of corporate taxation. Over the years, I've navigated the complexities of tax codes, witnessed the evolution of tax strategies, and closely followed the developments in corporate financial planning. My hands-on experience and in-depth knowledge make me well-equipped to dissect and analyze the key concepts embedded in the article about U.S. companies considering tax inversions.
The article delves into the scenario where U.S. companies explore tax inversions as a strategy to mitigate the impact of the country's high corporate tax rates. It introduces the concept of tax inversions, where a company relocates its headquarters on paper to a foreign country with lower corporate taxes. Notable companies, including AbbVie, Shire, Applied Materials, Horizon Pharma, Medtronic, and Chiquita Brands, are mentioned as potential players in this trend.
President Obama's stance on tax inversion deals is highlighted, attributing blame to accountants for finding legal loopholes that enable companies to undertake such maneuvers. The article questions the fairness of blaming accountants, emphasizing that these tax inversion deals are legal and within the purview of accountants' responsibilities to maximize savings for the companies they serve.
Furthermore, the article underscores the role of the U.S. corporate tax code, citing it as the highest among developed nations at approximately 35 percent. It suggests that the lack of real tax reform is at the root of the issue, and advocates for lawmakers to focus on rewriting the corporate tax code as a means to alleviate the burden on companies.
In conclusion, the article raises awareness about the ongoing debate surrounding tax inversions, emphasizing the need for substantial tax code reform to address the challenges faced by U.S. companies. As an expert in the field, I concur with the notion that a comprehensive overhaul of the corporate tax code could potentially render these tax inversion strategies obsolete, providing a more equitable and sustainable solution for all stakeholders involved.
