Where is the worst location on Earth for solar energy? (2024)

As we have discussed in a previous post, one of the main determinants of solar radiation at a given site is its latitude. Generally speaking, the higher the latitude, the lower the solar radiation level will be. This is purely a result of the Earth's shape: the sun's rays are distributed across a larger geographical area as we move further away from the equator. Thus, the amount of solar energy falling on a given area naturally decreases as we move towards the polar regions.

Where is the worst location on Earth for solar energy? (1)

Image credit:ru.wikipedia.org

However,you may be surprised to learn that the poles are actually not the worst places to be when it comes to solar energy. This honor belongs to an archipelago in Russia within the Arctic Circle (located at 78 degrees North and 100 degrees West). This northern island group, called Severnaya Zemlya ("Northern Land" in Russian), consists of five main islands and many smaller ones. All of these islands are uninhabited except for a three-person crew of a Russian meteorological research station located at the Golomyanny island. Why not Discover solar energy where you live?

Higher latitude and overcast conditions: Not a good combination for solar

According to our global solar radiation database, this area has a daily average global horizontal irradiance of 1510 watts/m2 . While it is not a big surprise that the worst location for solar energy on Earth is near one of the poles, this site is more than 1,000 kilometers away from the North Pole itself. The reason for the very limited amount of solar radiation at this location is the double whammy of a very high latitude combined with generally overcast skies due to the local micro-climate.

Running the numbers forSevernaya Zemlya


Where is the worst location on Earth for solar energy? (2)

Golomyanny Weather Station (image credit: ap /tugun.ru)

So how bad is the solar radiation potential on this site?If we were to install an average-sized residential solar photovoltaic system (with a capacity of 5 kW) on this location, we would produce around 2800 kWh of electricity during the year, or about 7 kWh per day. As we highlighted in a previous post, this level is only about a quarter of what the same system would generate at the best solar energy spot on Earth. While this amount of solar energy is clearly not sufficient to meet the needs of an average North American household, even the worst solar site on Earth can yield useful amounts of electricity from late Spring to early Fall. Paired with LED lights and mobile electronic devices (such as cell phones, tablets and laptops) solar energy can meet basic lighting and computing needs in this region for part of the year. Obviously, in order to secure a reliable power source, a diesel generator would also have to complement the solar panels. Even this marginal contribution of solar can be valuable if it decreases the need for shipping diesel fuel to this remote region.

We should also note that the daily average values can be very misleading at extreme latitudes. In winter months, there's hardly any solar radiation available at this site, making solar energy not a feasible option at all during these months. Thus, pairing a diesel generator with another renewable energy system, such as a wind turbine, can also be a viable option. After all, wind turbines can produce electricity during the night as well as during cold and dark winter days.

Not entirely game over for solar

It's hard to make a case for solar in this region based on the numbers above. These numbers are also a good reminder that solar energy is not suitable for every single location on Earth. It's no wonder that nuclear-powered icebreakers and diesel generators are the workhorses of the Russian scientific activities in this region. However, there is still an interesting niche for solar: portable power. When expeditions need power for their portable equipment (such as satellite phones, mobile computing devices and navigation equipment), solar panels can be an essential part of their kit. In fact, we had the pleasure of helping an expedition team to do just that and use solar energy in an extreme environment. More on that very soon!

Where is the worst location on Earth for solar energy? (2024)

FAQs

What areas of the world are not best suited for solar energy? ›

While it is not a big surprise that the worst location for solar energy on Earth is near one of the poles, this site is more than 1,000 kilometers away from the North Pole itself.

Where is solar energy most intense on Earth? ›

At latitudes near the equator ( ‍ ), the Earth's surface is almost directly perpendicular to the angle of the sun's rays. In these regions, solar radiation is intense because the sun's energy is concentrated over a small surface area.

What areas on Earth are worst suited for using solar energy to generate electricity? ›

What areas on Earth are worst suited for using solar energy to gene rate electricity? Regions toward the poles that receive inconsistent and indirect sunlight, regions that are frequently covered in clouds, and regions that have wetter climates.

Which region of the world has the least amount of solar energy? ›

The region that receives the least amount of solar radiation is the Arctic Circle, specifically the North Pole. This is because the Earth is tilted on its axis, and the North Pole is always tilted away from the Sun.

Why are there no solar panels in Arizona? ›

Why doesn't the state of Arizona invest more in solar power? Nasty public battles between the solar industry, utilities and the state's government over net metering have been ongoing for years, which is what some experts cite as the cause for the drop in solar installations in the state.

Which state uses the least solar energy? ›

North Dakota ranks worst for solar energy. Although North Dakota's climate is relatively conducive to solar energy, there are only two megawatts of total solar installation in the state.

Where is the best location for solar energy? ›

Flat solar panels work best near the equator, where the sun's position is high in the sky. Angled solar panels are more productive in locations farther to the north or south, where the sun has a lower altitude.

What are the worst energy sources? ›

Coal is by far the worst emitter, followed by natural gas, with solar, wind and nuclear all low-carbon.

Is solar worse for environment? ›

Using solar energy can have a positive, indirect effect on the environment when solar energy replaces or reduces the use of other energy sources that have larger effects on the environment. However, producing and using solar energy technologies may have some environmental affects.

Is solar energy bad for the land? ›

Ecological Impacts

The clearing and use of large areas of land for solar power facilities can adversely affect native vegetation and wildlife in many ways, including loss of habitat; interference with rainfall and drainage; or direct contact causing injury or death.

Where is solar radiation the lowest? ›

The more slanted the sun's rays are, the longer they travel through the atmosphere, becoming more scattered and diffuse. Because the Earth is round, the frigid polar regions never get a high sun, and because of the tilted axis of rotation, these areas receive no sun at all during part of the year.

Which part of the Earth receives less energy from the sun? ›

The angle of sunlight hitting the equator is more direct than it is at the poles, so the poles receive less direct sunlight.

Which latitude receives the least solar energy? ›

On an average those would be the poles. As you correctly pointed out, due to the tilt of the Earth's axis, there are large areas that receive very little and sometimes no sunlight at all and those change throughout the year. But on an average, poles are the ones that get the least amount of solar radiation.

Why countries don t use solar energy? ›

Presently, many developing nations simply cannot afford to fund the extension of existing power grids to reach those without power. Even the cost to maintain the struggling infrastructure already in place is out of the question for most.

Why can't solar energy be used everywhere? ›

—it's because the solar panels we have can only generate electricity when it's a clear sunny day. In order for a home or business to rely entirely on solar power, the owners would need to live in a sunny area and use batteries to store excess energy for cloudy and rainy days.

Why doesn't the whole world use solar energy? ›

The Nature authors say that global electricity supply cannot rely on a single source of generation. So no, rooftop solar isn't about to power the world. The equipment required to store solar power is still expensive, while solar panels can't deliver power for heavy industry, which requires very large currents.

Is solar energy readily available in all areas of the world? ›

Worldwide solar energy potential

Solar panels can generate electricity just about anywhere on Earth, but some areas receive more sunlight than others and, as such, have a higher solar energy potential.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Kelle Weber

Last Updated:

Views: 6183

Rating: 4.2 / 5 (73 voted)

Reviews: 80% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Kelle Weber

Birthday: 2000-08-05

Address: 6796 Juan Square, Markfort, MN 58988

Phone: +8215934114615

Job: Hospitality Director

Hobby: tabletop games, Foreign language learning, Leather crafting, Horseback riding, Swimming, Knapping, Handball

Introduction: My name is Kelle Weber, I am a magnificent, enchanting, fair, joyous, light, determined, joyous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.