What Social Media Evidence is Admissible in Court? - SMI Aware (2024)

Social media evidence has become a key component in litigation. Evaluating what a person posts to their social media accounts has become a standard part of discovery and is often a critical case component. But knowing what types of evidence to look for can be key to determining your search. Understanding what processes need to be in place to ensure the authenticity and admissibility of social media evidence is vital to ensuring that a court will consider that evidence.

What is social media evidence?

The term social media evidence refers to data contained in different social media platforms and whose integrity and digital chain of custody are maintained so that the evidence has value. It’s the digital footprint that a user leaves behind.

There are three things to consider when looking to gain access to evidence on a social media account.

  1. Does an account exist?
  2. Is that account public or private?
    1. If an account is public, you are free to gather any information shared there
    2. If an account is private, you may need to prove in court that content in the account is relevant and material to the case before it is admissible
  3. Is there relevant content in the account?

What could be admissible?

Evidence from social media platforms that could be admissible includes posts that the user made, shared, or liked. It could be an analysis of the friend list of that user. It could be photos or videos or a breakdown of what groups they are a member of on the platform.

How to ensure that social media evidence is admissible?

Both public and private information on a social media account may be admissible. Admissibility of evidence depends on several factors, including the relevance of the evidence to the case at hand and its authenticity.

To be admissible in court, social media evidence must first be authenticated directly. Authenticity is governed by several federal rules, including Rule 901. Authenticating or Identifying Evidence. For social media evidence to be admissible, it is necessary to prove the circ*mstances under which it was obtained, as well as the digital chain of custody, and how such evidence was preserved by investigators.

What social media platforms are useful for an investigation?

The social media platforms that are useful for a social media investigation are also among the most popular platforms, including Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, LinkedIn, TikTok, and Instagram. These platforms allow one to obtain pertinent information about an individual’s background and day-to-day life.

Check out our Investigator’s Guide seriesto learn more about the social media platforms that are useful in an investigation and the types of relevant material you may find on them.

Tools for capturing and preserving information

Professional webpage capture tools are one of the best ways to capture and preserve information on a person’s social media account. This type of software allows data collection of a social media profile’s entire content, including statuses, comments, and the photos and videos published there. The information is extracted and published as a PDF file, making it easy to read while also including the technical data of the process. This technical data provides a digital footprint that shows how & where the information was obtained, including the URL, time of capture, source code, and metadata, thus preserving the integrity of the digital evidence.

While tools exist to help capture and preserve information from social media accounts, it is worth considering how the human factor affects this data collection. Using people to conduct social media and web research carries both positives and negatives. Among the pros when using trained professionals is specificity in searches, customizable reports that meet a client’s specific goals, and higher quality results due to the expertise and analysis behind the research performed. On the other hand, human involvement introduces the very real possibility of human error. Searches conducted by humans are also time-consuming – and for attorneys, time is money.

The solution is not to adopt a blind acceptance of imprecise or inaccurate automated search response or take a luddite approach and dismiss technology and automation altogether. A smarter strategy is to combine the power of automated searches with the oversight of human expertise.

SMI Aware specializes in locating and preserving internet evidence. Our proprietary technology and certified Analysts will save time and money while improving data quality. Contact us today for help capturing that information.

Social media evidence has become a crucial element in litigation, shaping the landscape of legal proceedings. It's not just about what a person posts; it's about understanding the authenticity and admissibility of that content. The term "social media evidence" encompasses data from various platforms, emphasizing the need for maintaining integrity and a digital chain of custody.

Firstly, identifying the existence and nature of a social media account is pivotal. The distinction between public and private accounts determines the ease of access. While public accounts allow free gathering of information, private accounts require proving the relevance of content in court for admissibility.

The admissible content includes posts, shares, likes, friend lists, photos, videos, and group affiliations. Authentication is a critical step for admissibility, involving proving the circ*mstances of obtaining the evidence, establishing the digital chain of custody, and detailing preservation methods.

Popular platforms like Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, LinkedIn, TikTok, and Instagram are instrumental in social media investigations. These platforms offer insights into an individual's background and daily life, contributing to the overall evidence pool.

Effective tools for capturing and preserving social media information include professional webpage capture tools. These tools ensure comprehensive data collection, creating a PDF file that includes technical details like URL, time of capture, source code, and metadata—safeguarding the digital evidence's integrity.

While tools automate the process, human involvement in social media and web research is advantageous. Trained professionals bring specificity, customizable reports, and higher-quality results due to expertise. However, human involvement introduces the risk of error and is time-consuming.

A balanced approach involves combining automated searches with human oversight. This synergy optimizes the benefits of both, minimizing errors and maximizing efficiency. SMI Aware, specializing in locating and preserving internet evidence, provides a solution. Their proprietary technology and certified analysts offer a streamlined process, saving time and money while enhancing data quality. For effective information capture, reaching out to SMI Aware is a smart strategy.

What Social Media Evidence is Admissible in Court? - SMI Aware (2024)

FAQs

What Social Media Evidence is Admissible in Court? - SMI Aware? ›

Both public and private information on a social media account may be admissible. Admissibility of evidence depends on several factors, including the relevance of the evidence to the case at hand and its authenticity. To be admissible in court, social media evidence must first be authenticated directly.

Can social media be used as evidence in court? ›

If any applicable information is posted publicly on social media, it can be used as evidence by an opposing party. In some cases, private social media posts or other information can be accessed, but only if an opposing party requests access to them from the court or judge.

How do you admit social media into evidence? ›

Authenticate that the exhibit used at trial, such as a printout of the social media content, is a fair and accurate representation of what was on the computer screen; and a testimony by a witness who viewed the information on the site is usually sufficient to meet this requirement.

Which type of evidence is admissible in court? ›

Generally, to be admissible, the evidence must be relevant) and not outweighed by countervailing considerations (e.g., the evidence is unfairly prejudicial, confusing, a waste of time, privileged, or, among other reasons, based on hearsay).

Are Facebook messages admissible in court? ›

Keep in mind that social media posts and messages are considered a writing and may be admissible as evidence in court. This includes every Facebook post, Snap, TikTok video or Instagram photo caption. Everything you share on social media can potentially become public, whether you want it to be or not.

What digital evidence is admissible in court? ›

Digital evidence must be authentic in order to be reliable and admissible in court. If digital evidence is not authentic, it can be excluded from evidence and may even be grounds for a motion to suppress. Authentic digital evidence must be accurate and reliable. It must be complete and unaltered.

What is the best evidence rule in social media? ›

The rule stipulates that if you want to prove the content of a writing, recording, or photograph, you must produce the original document, recording, or photograph. This is based on the idea that the original piece of evidence is the most reliable and accurate source of information about its contents — aka.

Are social media posts hearsay? ›

Hearsay, California Evidence Code § 1200, 1220 – 1390

Hearsay rules also apply to evidence. Social media posts would seem to be hearsay, in that they are statements made by someone who might not be a witness, which an attorney would offer to assert the truth of the matter states.

How do courts verify text messages? ›

You can authenticate text messages by presenting: a “copy,” a screenshot, photo, or print-out of the message that includes identifying information that links the message to the texter, and. testimony or affidavit that the copy is a true and accurate representation of the text messages.

How do you authenticate text messages as evidence? ›

You may also secure an affidavit or testimony that shows that both originals and copies are true and precise representations of the texts. If possible, you should include copies of texts that include the date and time – stamped on the messages and the contact details of the sender, such as a phone number.

What evidence Cannot be used in court? ›

Inadmissible evidence is evidence that lawyers can't present to a jury. Forms of evidence judges consider inadmissible include hearsay, prejudicial, improperly obtained or irrelevant items. For example, investigators use polygraph tests to determine whether a person is lying about the events of a case.

What is strong evidence in court? ›

The clear and convincing evidence standard is employed in both civil and criminal trials. According to the Supreme Court in Colorado v. New Mexico, 467 U.S. 310 (1984), "clear and convincing” means that the evidence is highly and substantially more likely to be true than untrue.

What 2 qualities must evidence have to be admissible in court? ›

For evidence to be admissible, it must be relevant and "not excluded by the rules of evidence", which generally means that it must not be unfairly prejudicial, and it must have some indicia of reliability.

Can screenshots be used as evidence? ›

Can we submit screenshots as evidence to the court? Yes. Electronic evidence is admissible in the court of law. Make sure you do not edit them and produce the original instrument on which they were taken.

Are Messenger screenshots admissible in court? ›

The Supreme Court has ruled that photos and messages obtained by private individuals from a Facebook messenger account are admissible as evidence in court. In a 31-page decision penned by Justice Jhosep Y. Lopez, the Court sustained the conviction of the petitioner, Christian C.

Are text messages admissible as evidence? ›

According to California law, text messages can be considered as evidence in family court proceedings. These text messages can be used as proof or facts to establish allegations of adultery, financial infidelity, domestic violence, child abuse or neglect, or other threatening behavior.

What Cannot be used as evidence in court? ›

Inadmissible evidence is evidence that lawyers can't present to a jury. Forms of evidence judges consider inadmissible include hearsay, prejudicial, improperly obtained or irrelevant items.

Can social media screenshots be used in court? ›

Social media platforms are considered public spaces. If a photo, statement, or other activity is posted on a social media page—whether private or public—law enforcement can use it as relevant evidence.

Can a lawyer talk about a case on social media? ›

Can lawyers talk about their cases on social media? Lawyers aren't technically banned from talking about their cases on social media. Under attorney-client privilege, however, lawyers cannot divulge details about anything their clients reveal to them in a court of law.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Annamae Dooley

Last Updated:

Views: 6561

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (45 voted)

Reviews: 84% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Annamae Dooley

Birthday: 2001-07-26

Address: 9687 Tambra Meadow, Bradleyhaven, TN 53219

Phone: +9316045904039

Job: Future Coordinator

Hobby: Archery, Couponing, Poi, Kite flying, Knitting, Rappelling, Baseball

Introduction: My name is Annamae Dooley, I am a witty, quaint, lovely, clever, rich, sparkling, powerful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.