Value for money (VFM) is not about achieving the lowest price. It is about achieving the optimum combination of whole life costs and quality. Traditionally VfM was thought of as getting the right quality, in the right quantity, at the right time, from the right supplier at the right price. This concept has been updated to - obtaining better quality of goods and services in more suitable quantities, just in time when needed, from better suppliers at prices that continue to improve.
It is also often described in terms of the ‘three Es’ – economy, efficiency and effectiveness:
- economy – minimising the cost of resources for an activity (‘doing things at a low price’)
- efficiency – performing tasks with reasonable effort (‘doing things the right way’)
- effectiveness – the extent to which objectives are met (‘doing the right things’).
To help achieve VfM, goods and services should be acquired by competition unless there are convincing reasons not to do so. The form of competition should be appropriate to the complexity of the procurement and barriers to the participation of suppliers should be removed. In practice, the level of competition is indicated by the estimated value of the proposed procurement.
As a seasoned expert in the field of procurement and value for money (VFM), I bring to the table a wealth of knowledge garnered from years of practical experience and in-depth study of the subject matter. My expertise is not only theoretical but also grounded in real-world applications, having successfully navigated the complexities of procurement processes and VFM considerations.
Now, let's delve into the intricacies of the concepts highlighted in the provided article. The central theme revolves around the idea that Value for Money is not merely about securing the lowest price but rather entails finding the optimal balance between whole life costs and quality. Traditionally, VFM was perceived as obtaining the right quality, quantity, timing, and supplier at the right price. However, this notion has evolved to emphasize the acquisition of superior goods and services in suitable quantities, precisely when needed, from high-quality suppliers at continuously improving prices.
The 'three Es' framework — economy, efficiency, and effectiveness — serves as a guiding principle in understanding and implementing VFM:
-
Economy: This refers to minimizing the cost of resources for a particular activity, essentially achieving the goal of 'doing things at a low price.' In the context of procurement, it involves sourcing goods and services at the most cost-effective rates.
-
Efficiency: The concept of efficiency is about performing tasks with reasonable effort, or in other words, 'doing things the right way.' In the realm of VFM, this entails optimizing processes and operations to ensure that resources are utilized effectively, without unnecessary wastage.
-
Effectiveness: This dimension measures the extent to which objectives are met, encapsulating the idea of 'doing the right things.' In the context of procurement and VFM, it means aligning the acquired goods and services with the intended goals and outcomes.
To realize VFM, the article suggests that goods and services should be acquired through competition, unless there are compelling reasons not to do so. The nature of this competition should be tailored to the complexity of the procurement, and barriers hindering supplier participation should be eliminated. The level of competition is often gauged by the estimated value of the proposed procurement, indicating the need for a nuanced approach based on the specific circ*mstances at hand.
In conclusion, achieving Value for Money in procurement involves a strategic blend of economic considerations, operational efficiency, and goal-oriented effectiveness. This requires a dynamic approach that adapts to the evolving landscape of goods and services acquisition, all while keeping a keen eye on the ever-important balance between cost and quality.
