VUG vs. QQQ — ETF comparison tool (2024)

FAQs

VUG vs. QQQ — ETF comparison tool? ›

QQQ - Performance Comparison. In the year-to-date period, VUG achieves a 10.61% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 7.66% return. Over the past 10 years, VUG has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 15.06%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 18.65% annualized return.

Performance Comparison of QQQ vs. VONG. The total return performance including dividends is crucial to consider when analyzing different investment funds. As of 1/15/2024, QQQ has a one year annualized return of 35.01%, while VONG has a five year annualized return of 42.63%.

SCHG - Performance Comparison. In the year-to-date period, QQQM achieves a 7.71% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 11.91% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.

FSPGX - Fidelity ® Large Cap Growth Index Fund.

QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison. VUG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQ's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

VUG has a conensus rating of Strong Buy which is based on 172 buy ratings, 28 hold ratings and 0 sell ratings. What is VUG's price target? The average price target for VUG is $386.51.

What ETF is better than VUG? ›

Over the past 10 years, VGT has outperformed VUG with an annualized return of 20.31%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively lower 14.93% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.

Both Fidelity and Vanguard have a wide variety of low-cost mutual funds and ETFs. If you're simply looking at the options offered by each firm, Fidelity has more options available.

One of the few differences between these two funds is their expense ratio. The newer QQQM has a lower expense ratio by 0.05%. QQQM has an expense ratio of 0.15% compared to QQQ expense ratio of 0.20%. QQQM is a better option if you want to pay the lowest fees possible since its expense ratio is 25% smaller than QQQ.

Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF holds a Zacks ETF Rank of 2 (Buy), which is based on expected asset class return, expense ratio, and momentum, among other factors. Because of this, VONG is a great option for investors seeking exposure to the Style Box - Large Cap Growth segment of the market.

Bloomberg recently reported that only one equity mutual fund, the Baron Partners Fund, has outperformed QQQ over the past 5, 10, and 15 years, mainly due to its outsized exposure to Tesla.

Performance Comparison of VONG vs. VOO. The total return performance including dividends is crucial to consider when analyzing different investment funds. As of 1/15/2024, VONG has a one year annualized return of 42.63%, while VOO has a five year annualized return of 26.25%.