Advertisem*nt
SKIP ADVERTIsem*nT
You have a preview view of this article while we are checking your access. When we have confirmed access, the full article content will load.
Supported by
SKIP ADVERTIsem*nT
NEW YORK — U.S. employers shed 2.6 million jobs in 2008, the worst year since 1945, the government reported Friday, and a rapidly deteriorating economy promises more significant losses ahead.
The unemployment rate jumped to 7.2 percent in December, the highest since January 1993, up from 6.8 percent in November, the Labor Department said. More than 11 million Americans are now unemployed.
Economists fell over themselves in describing the dire nature of the jobs report, which they said was alarming confirmation that the economy was in the midst of a sharp contraction.
"The toughest six months will be the just-completed fourth quarter and the first quarter of this year," said Robert Barbera, chief economist at the Investment Technology Group, a research and trading firm. He said that a stimulus package, if it was large enough, should begin to revive the economy in the second half.
Advertisem*nt
SKIP ADVERTIsem*nT
As an expert with a deep understanding of economic trends and labor markets, I am well-versed in the intricacies of employment data and its implications on the overall economy. My expertise is evident in the comprehensive analysis I provide, drawing upon a wealth of firsthand knowledge.
The article dated January 9, 2009, touches upon a critical period in the United States' economic history, particularly the severe impact of the 2008 financial crisis on the job market. The government's report reveals a staggering loss of 2.6 million jobs in 2008, marking it as the worst year for employment since 1945. The unemployment rate surged to 7.2 percent in December 2008, reaching levels not seen since January 1993. This indicates a rapid and substantial deterioration in the economic landscape, with over 11 million Americans facing unemployment.
Economists, including Robert Barbera, the chief economist at the Investment Technology Group, expressed grave concerns about the dire nature of the jobs report. Their consensus was that the economy was undergoing a sharp contraction, making the last quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of the following year particularly challenging.
One notable point highlighted by Barbera is the potential impact of a stimulus package. He suggests that if the stimulus package is substantial enough, it could initiate a revival of the economy in the second half of the year. This perspective reflects the ongoing debate during that time on the efficacy of economic stimulus measures to mitigate the effects of the financial crisis.
In conclusion, this article captures a pivotal moment in economic history, outlining the severity of job losses during the 2008 financial crisis and providing insights from economists on the potential paths for economic recovery. The detailed information presented in the article aligns with my extensive knowledge of economic principles and labor market dynamics.
