The trouble with the UN SDGs 2030 global goals (2024)

UN SDGs

As we invest trillions of dollars in sustainable development, let’s tackle the root causes of the problems we’re trying to solve

The trouble with the UN SDGs 2030 global goals (2)

The Sustainable Development Goals SDGs are being used as a global framework for investment, philanthropy and development budgets. What could possibly be wrong with that?

I am all in favor of collective action and cooperation, and I understand the complexities of making global leaders agree. But the Sustainable Development Goals largely ignore the causes of our most pressing challenges in favor of addressing only the symptoms.

We see the impact objective of “ending extreme poverty” but we have yet to see impact objectives that include “ending extreme wealth.”

We see “zero hunger” but never hear “end market speculation and manipulation.”

We see “reduce unemployment” but never hear of “end consolidation.”

System-change?

I have watched this since the SDGS began to take hold as a global investment thesis. I saw they put justice and peace at the end instead of the beginning. I started questioning if these goals sought incremental change or a real transformation. Are these goals sponsored by corporations and large philanthropists? Are they following some specific agenda?

One example: Naming SDG №2 “Zero Hunger” instead of “Food Sovereignty,” for example, gives a free pass to corporations delivering high-sugar food to young children and disguising this as ending hunger. Rather than relieving hunger, such actions deepen child obesity and diabetes here in Mexico.

Indigenous communities in Pacific islands, Southeast Asia and Mexico, for example, are losing their ability to grow their own food in Milpa style (using permaculture). Increasingly they are becoming consumers of junk food that is sometimes cheaper, more accessible and less labor intensive.

This creates all kinds of health problems, which leads to the increasing difficulty of achieving SDG №3: Good health and well being. No amount of medicine, vaccines and biotech will cure a sick society with a sickening environment, but if we have a healthy society and a thriving environment we can surely afford to give medicine to those who truly need it.

One of the most problematic goals is SDG №8: Decent work and economic growth. The goal targets 7% annual economic growth, among other myopic standards. Targeting growth, instead of balance in a resource-finite world, is a recipe for environmental degradation. As Kenneth Boulding once said: “Anyone who believes in indefinite growth, on a physically finite planet, is either mad or an economist.”

Targeting decent jobs and ending modern slavery by 2025 is such a low standard. What does decent really mean? Why don’t we build, instead, a more direct path to self-fulfillment and autonomy?

Take SDG №16: Peace and justice. If risks and benefits are unfairly distributed in business, no amount of philanthropy or development aid will be able to address inequality and violence. But if risks and benefits are distributed in a socially and environmentally just way, then we may achieve peace.

Words matter

When international organizations have the power to carry messages that will deploy an immense amount of resources, time and energy worldwide, that will be adopted by governments, banks and corporations, that will be heard in every corner of the globe there is a genuine responsibility of crafting the right message.

True Sustainable Development Goals would include individual empowerment, economy at the service of people and planet. How about thriving local communities, decentralizing banks, end monoculture?

Saving the oppressed is always so sexy and romantic — but what about exploring the forces that are oppressing and putting a stop to those first?

Is better a good enough destination for all of us? Or can we achieve best for all of us? Here’s my manifesto:

Let’s stop investing in medicine and start investing in health.
Let’s stop focusing on jobs and start focusing on self-sufficiency.
Let’s evolve from a focus on economic growth to focus on well-being.
The world doesn’t need indefinite growth, it needs to understand ecological limits and what balance looks like.

Let’s never settle for making the “means” the destination.
Let’s evolve from financial “inclusion” to financial “justice.”
Let’s move away from less dirty air towards clean air.
From ending poverty to sharing prosperity and abundance for all with all.
From zero hunger to food sovereignty.

The trouble with the UN SDGs 2030 global goals (3)

From doing less harm to regeneration.
From fixing the way we give back to ending the way we extract.
Money doesn’t need returns, we need financial safety and transcendence.
Let’s not obsess about outputs when we can have outcomes.
Never forget that short-term thinking can sacrifice long-term goals (see photo).

Let’s stop focusing on sustainability and start focusing on prosperity and thriving.

You don’t need to be rich, you need to be happy.

The promised land is happiness not pleasure.

Happiness comes from plenitude and plenitude from love.

Love comes with serving.

And love is never mediocre middle ground but full surrender.

We aren’t here to make the world “better” we are here to make the world the best imaginable place for all.

Laura Ortiz Montemayor is co-founder of SVX Mexico.

The trouble with the UN SDGs 2030 global goals (2024)

FAQs

The trouble with the UN SDGs 2030 global goals? ›

At the same time, it calls attention to the fact that the SDGs are not being achieved on a global scale. Actually, the main challenges behind the UN Agenda 2030 achievement are complex, and the COVID-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine have contributed to making the SDGs achievement more challenging (Eurostat, 2022).

What is the controversy with the SDGs? ›

One of the more philosophical criticisms of the SDGs has to do with their very nature. By setting goals instead of rights, world leaders can take credit for progress – however faltering – toward a better world rather than having to grapple with the dismal conditions far too many people continue to live in.

What are the problems with the SDGs? ›

One of the primary challenges in achieving the SDGs is the persistence of inequality within and between countries. Economic disparities, conflict, unequal access to education and healthcare, discrimination based on gender, race, and socioeconomic status hinder progress towards many of the goals.

What is the global issue of SDG? ›

The SDGs are designed to end poverty, hunger, AIDS, and discrimination against women and girls. The creativity, knowhow, technology and financial resources from all of society is necessary to achieve the SDGs in every context.

What is the biggest hindrance to the successful implementation of Agenda 2030? ›

However, states remain skittish on the details of fulfilling their Paris Agreement targets, and atmospheric carbon levels in February 2020 have hit the highest level in history. One of the greatest challenges for the implementation of Agenda 2030 is a lack of financing for development.

Why have the SDGs failed? ›

At the forefront of these challenges lies the persistent grip of poverty and economic stagnation (SDG 1 and 8). The lack of economic opportunities and constrained access to resources stand as formidable barriers to poverty eradication (SDG 1) and the advancement of sustainable economic growth (SDG 8).

What is the most controversial SDG? ›

One of the most problematic goals is SDG №8: Decent work and economic growth. The goal targets 7% annual economic growth, among other myopic standards. Targeting growth, instead of balance in a resource-finite world, is a recipe for environmental degradation.

Are the SDGs contradictory? ›

There are two sides to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which appear at risk of contradiction. One calls for humanity to achieve “harmony with nature” and to protect the planet from degradation, with specific targets laid out in Goals 6, 12, 13, 14, and 15.

Who are those left behind referred to in the 2030 agenda? ›

The 2030 Agenda's Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) outcome document sets out an illustrative list of the groups who are left behind: “…children, youth, persons with disabilities (of whom more than 80 per cent live in poverty), people living with HIV/AIDS, older persons, indigenous peoples, refugees and internally ...

Is sustainable development is an issue? ›

The issue of sustainable development encompasses issues in economics, ecology and social sciences. They interface along two emerging notions.

Who is in charge of the global goals? ›

The Division for Sustainable Development Goals (DSDG) in the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA) acts as the Secretariat for the SDGs, providing substantive support and capacity-building for the goals and their related thematic issues, including water, energy, climate, oceans, urbanization ...

Why is 2030 so important? ›

The Global Goals and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development seek to end poverty and hunger, realise the human rights of all, achieve gender equality and the empowerment of all women and girls, and ensure the lasting protection of the planet and its natural resources.

What is the main problem of global sustainability concerned with? ›

Climate change is widely seen as the biggest challenge of our age. Vast financial and human resources are being mobilized to deal with the causes and effects of climate change, and to bring about an energy transition away from fossil fuels to renewable resources.

What are 3 challenges faced in achieving SDGs by 2030? ›

There are a number of challenges for achieving SDGs such as lack of effective leadership, coordinated partnerships, investments, implementation, and indicators with effective data collection.

What are the 5 priorities of Agenda 2030? ›

We resolve, between now and 2030, to end poverty and hunger everywhere; to combat inequalities within and among countries; to build peaceful, just and inclusive societies; to protect human rights and promote gender equality and the empowerment of women and girls; and to ensure the lasting protection of the planet and ...

Why it will be difficult for sustainable development to be met by 2030? ›

Truly sustainable development requires a holistic approach

Natural resources such as water and energy are becoming more scarce, lands are being rapidly degraded, and income and gender inequities are intensifying. Furthermore, economies often develop unevenly, so much like politics, sustainability is a local issue.

What are the criticism of SDG 3? ›

Among the key challenges to achieving SDG 3, we have identified four critical concerns: the problem of health funding in terms of both amounts and patterns; the poorly regulated and growing role of private parties taking multiple forms; the intersectional nature of inequality and the limitations of many current ...

Are SDGs ethical? ›

The aim of the SDGs to improve quality of life for all and create a better world for all humanity, one built on human rights and justice, is a commendable ethical aspiration toward a good life and humane society. Implied within the 17 SDGs and 169 targets is the offer of a comprehensive view of development.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Msgr. Benton Quitzon

Last Updated:

Views: 6780

Rating: 4.2 / 5 (43 voted)

Reviews: 82% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Msgr. Benton Quitzon

Birthday: 2001-08-13

Address: 96487 Kris Cliff, Teresiafurt, WI 95201

Phone: +9418513585781

Job: Senior Designer

Hobby: Calligraphy, Rowing, Vacation, Geocaching, Web surfing, Electronics, Electronics

Introduction: My name is Msgr. Benton Quitzon, I am a comfortable, charming, thankful, happy, adventurous, handsome, precious person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.