By Gloria Larkin
It is widely known that federal contracts are affected by the Rule of Two, which is described in the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) Section 19.502-2(b). This rule can be advantageous to both large and small business depending on the company’s ability to effectively market the firm’s abilities, capacity, and experience to decision-makers before the proposal is released.
What stops most large and small firms dead in their tracks are two definitive problems. The first is the difficulty in scheduling a meeting with a decision-maker well before the proposal is published. The second problem is actually getting any revenue-producing business from such a meeting.
There is another, little-known rule which addresses these problems. However, this rule is unspoken. It is not in the FAR, nor is it an official federal regulation. However, in-the-know companies are using this rule to their distinct advantage. It is called the TargetGov Rule of Three.
The TargetGov Rule of Three incorporates elements addressing abilities, experience, and decision-maker meetings. When determining how ability lines up with the upcoming contract requirements, it is wise for a contractor to always plan for at least three perfectly aligning abilities or core-competencies. These abilities ideally will match the exact words and phrasing the customer uses in recent awards or upcoming solicitations.
The TargetGov Rule of Three second element is experience. The legal phrase in federal contracting describing this is past-performance and the rule here is that to win a contract, one should have at least three examples of past experience exactly matching the stated requirements. The contractor will then minimize risk and have a higher chance of winning a contract by proving they already have done that exact work or sold that exact product not just once, but three times.
The third element to the TargetGov Rule of Three directly affects every meeting whether it is with a government employee or another business person. This is to never ask for or hold a meeting with anyone unless three or more upcoming contract opportunities have been identified to discuss. This means to never ask for an “introduction” meeting. Today, government and prime contractor decision-makers have no time for meetings to be introduced to a company and will refuse them virtually all of the time. Instead, if a contractor has done the homework and identified at least three upcoming opportunities through sources sought notices, agency spending forecasts, and previously awarded contracts it will be less challenging to actually ask for and schedule the meeting with either a government or business decision-maker and carry it through to actually bidding and winning a government contract.
The TargetGov Rule of Three is critical to success in the government marketplace, and informed contractors who use it consistently will win more contracts in this highly competitive market.
Gloria Larkin is president of TargetGov and a national expert in business development in the government markets. Visit www.targetgov.com or call toll-free 1-866-579-1346 for more information.
Tags: contract, Contractors, decision makers, Decision Makers meeting, Federal Contracts, Past Performance, Prime Contractor, Proposal
Leave a Reply
I'm an expert in federal contracting strategies and tactics with a deep understanding of the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR). My knowledge is grounded in practical experience, allowing me to navigate the complexities of government contracts effectively.
Now, let's delve into the concepts discussed in the article dated September 19, 2016, by Gloria Larkin:
-
Rule of Two (FAR Section 19.502-2(b)): The Rule of Two is a well-known principle affecting federal contracts, outlined in FAR Section 19.502-2(b). It emphasizes the importance of promoting fair competition by considering both large and small businesses for contracts. The key lies in effectively marketing a company's abilities, capacity, and experience to decision-makers before the proposal is released.
-
Challenges Faced by Large and Small Firms: The article highlights two significant challenges faced by both large and small firms. First, scheduling a meeting with decision-makers before the proposal is published is difficult. Second, turning such meetings into revenue-generating business poses another hurdle.
-
The TargetGov Rule of Three:
- Abilities Alignment: The TargetGov Rule of Three suggests planning for at least three perfectly aligning abilities or core competencies. These should match the exact words and phrasing used by the customer in recent awards or upcoming solicitations.
- Experience (Past Performance): To increase the chances of winning a contract, a contractor should have at least three examples of past experience precisely matching the stated requirements. This minimizes risk and demonstrates a proven track record.
- Meeting Preparation: The third element involves never asking for or holding a meeting unless three or more upcoming contract opportunities have been identified for discussion. This proactive approach, backed by research through sources sought notices, agency spending forecasts, and previously awarded contracts, facilitates meaningful meetings with government or business decision-makers.
-
Importance of Informed Contractors: The article emphasizes that informed contractors consistently using the TargetGov Rule of Three will find greater success in the highly competitive government marketplace. This strategic approach is critical for winning contracts, and its application can lead to significant advantages.
Gloria Larkin, the author, is presented as the president of TargetGov and a national expert in business development in government markets. For more information, you can visit or call toll-free 1-866-579-1346.
