The Lost Decade, Revisited - AMG Wealth (2024)

Advisor Insights

Market Insights

September 29, 20222 Min Read

September 29, 2022

2 Min Read

The Lost Decade, Revisited - AMG Wealth (1)

The Lost Decade, Revisited - AMG Wealth (2)

Michael E. Schroer, CFA

MANAGING PARTNER & CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER | RENAISSANCE INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT

Highlights

The stock market weakness thus far this year has triggered memories of the so-called “Lost Decade for Stocks,” and some predictions that another lost decade is ahead of us.

The term “Lost Decade for Stocks” refers to the ten-year period from 12/31/1999 through 12/31/2009, when the S&P 500® generated an annualized total return of -0.9% over the period. This was only the second time that the market actually had a negative total return over a decade period. The other period was the Great Depression decade of the 1930s.

Growth of $1 Invested From 12/31/1999 – 12/31/2009
1 Annualized returnSources: Renaissance Research, FactSet

The U.S. stock market has been top-heavy with few large companies, primarily in tech, driving returns for several years. Now may be an especially good time to diversify away from concentrated indices and, instead, consider high quality, reasonably priced growth opportunities.

The 1999-2009 period was marked by the collapse of the late dot-com bubble, the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, as well as two recessions, the deepest being the 2008-2009 Financial Crisis. Importantly, the trailing P/E multiple of the S&P 500 was over 29x at the end of 1999 (compared with only 19x today). With all of those headwinds, it isn’t surprising the S&P 500 struggled to post any gain.

However, a deeper look at the stock market over that period provides a better perspective on its rate of return. For example, the S&P 500 calculated on an equal-weighted basis posted an annualized total return of 5.1% over the period, 6.0% higher than the cap-weighted version of the Index. While a dollar invested in the cap-weighted S&P 500 at the end of 1999 declined to 91 cents by the end of 2009, a dollar invested in the equal-weighted index would have grown to $1.64 (+64.0%, unannualized).

Total Returns: 12/31/1999 through 12/31/2009

The Lost Decade, Revisited - AMG Wealth (4)

Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance for periods of one year or less is not annualized. All returns are shown in U.S. dollars.Sources: Renaissance Research, FactSet

The stocks in each version of the index are identical, but the equal-weighted approach would have avoided some of the disappointing performance posted by very large cap stocks over the decade and invested more in medium-sized stocks in the S&P 500 Index that experienced better growth. Similarly, investing in mid cap or small cap stocks would have generated good total returns as well, resulting in end-of-period values twice the value of investing in the S&P 500.

A “lost decade,” while historically rare and unlikely, is still very concerning to contemplate. However, diversification across various market capitalization ranges of U.S. stocks may provide additional possibilities for returns above that of simply the cap-weighted S&P 500.

LEARN MORE ABOUT DIVERSIFICATION

The Lost Decade, Revisited - AMG Wealth (5)

Michael E. Schroer, CFA

MANAGING PARTNER & CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER | RENAISSANCE INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT

Highlights

The stock market weakness thus far this year has triggered memories of the so-called “Lost Decade for Stocks,” and some predictions that another lost decade is ahead of us.

Get Our Latest Posts Delivered Right To Your Inbox.

Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

This Market Update reflects the thoughts of Renaissance as of September 15, 2022. This information has been provided by Renaissance Investment Management. All material presented is compiled from sources believed to be reliable and current, but accuracy cannot be guaranteed. This is not to be construed as an offer to buy or sell any financial instruments and should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision, nor should it be considered a recommendation. The views and opinions expressed are those of the Chief Investment Officer at the time of publication and are subject to change. There is no guarantee that these views will come to pass. As with all investments, there are associated inherent risks. Please obtain and review all financial material carefully before investing.

PERFORMANCE
If Renaissance or benchmark performance is shown, it represents historically achieved results, and is no guarantee of future performance. Future investments may be made under materially different economic conditions, in different securities and using different investment strategies and these differences may have a significant effect on the results portrayed. Each of these material market or economic conditions may or may not be repeated. Therefore, there may be sharp differences between the benchmark or Renaissance performance shown and the actual performance results achieved by any particular client. Benchmark results are shown for comparison purposes only. The benchmark presented represents unmanaged portfolios whose characteristics differ from the composite portfolios; however, they tend to represent the investment environment existing during the time periods shown. The benchmark cannot be invested in directly. The returns of the benchmark do not include any transaction costs, management fees or other costs. The holdings of the client portfolios in our composites may differ significantly from the securities that comprise the benchmark shown. The benchmark has been selected to represent what Renaissance believes is an appropriate benchmark with which to compare the composite performance.

The value of an investment may fall as well as rise. Please note that different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk and there can be no assurance that any specific investment will either be suitable or profitable for a client or prospective client’s investment portfolio. Investor principal is not guaranteed and investors may not receive the full amount of their investment at the time of sale if asset values have fallen. No assurance can be given that an investor will not lose invested capital. Consultants supplied with these performance results are advised to use this data in accordance with SEC guidelines. The actual performance achieved by a client portfolio may be affected by a variety of factors, including the initial balance of the account, the timing and amount of any additions to or withdrawals from the portfolio, changes made to the account to reflect the specific investment needs or preferences of the client, durations and timing of participation as a RIM client, and a client portfolio’s risk tolerance, investment objectives, and investment time horizon. All investments carry a certain degree of risk, including the loss of principal and are not guaranteed by the U.S. government.

REFERENCED INDEX
(Indices are unmanaged and are not available for direct investment.)
S&P 500 Index—The S&P 500 Stock Index is a market capitalization weighted index and consists of 500 stocks chosen for market size, liquidity and industry group representation.
S&P Midcap 400 Index—The S&P MidCap 400 Index, is a capitalization-weighted index that serves as a gauge for the U.S. mid-cap equities sector.
S&P Small Cap 600 Index—The S&P Small Cap 600 Index is a capitalization-weighted index that measures the performance of selected U.S. stocks with a small market capitalization.

S&P DATA
S&P Dow Jones is the source and owner of the trademarks, service marks and copyrights related to the S&P Indexes. S&P® is a trademark of S&P Dow Jones. This presentation may contain proprietary S&P data and unauthorized use, disclosure, copying, dissemination or redistribution is strictly prohibited. This is a presentation of Renaissance Investment Management. S&P Dow Jones is not responsible for the formatting or configuration of this material or for any inaccuracy in Renaissance’s presentation thereof. This data is to be used for the recipient’s internal use only.

More Like This

I'm an investment expert with a deep understanding of financial markets, particularly focusing on stock market trends, investment strategies, and market dynamics. My knowledge encompasses various aspects of portfolio management, risk assessment, and market analysis.

In the article by Michael E. Schroer, CFA, Managing Partner & Chief Investment Officer at Renaissance Investment Management, the focus is on the current weakness in the stock market, reminiscent of the "Lost Decade for Stocks" from 1999 to 2009. I'll provide a breakdown of the key concepts discussed in the article:

  1. Lost Decade for Stocks (1999-2009):

    • The term refers to the ten-year period from December 31, 1999, to December 31, 2009, during which the S&P 500 generated an annualized total return of -0.9%.
    • The period was marked by significant events, including the collapse of the late dot-com bubble, the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, and the 2008-2009 Financial Crisis.
  2. Top-Heavy Stock Market:

    • The U.S. stock market has been top-heavy, with a concentration of returns driven by a few large companies, primarily in the technology sector.
  3. Current Market Conditions:

    • The article suggests that the current market conditions might be an opportune time to diversify away from concentrated indices.
  4. Valuation Metrics:

    • The trailing P/E multiple of the S&P 500 was over 29x at the end of 1999, compared with 19x at the time of the article. This implies a relatively lower valuation today.
  5. Equal-Weighted vs. Cap-Weighted S&P 500:

    • The article highlights that an equal-weighted approach to the S&P 500 would have outperformed the cap-weighted version during the 1999-2009 period.
    • While the cap-weighted S&P 500 struggled, the equal-weighted index posted an annualized total return of 5.1%, significantly higher than the cap-weighted version.
  6. Diversification Strategy:

    • The article suggests that diversification across various market capitalization ranges of U.S. stocks may provide additional possibilities for returns, beyond the cap-weighted S&P 500.
  7. Concerns about a "Lost Decade":

    • While acknowledging that a "lost decade" is historically rare, the article emphasizes the importance of considering diversification as a strategy to mitigate risks.
  8. Performance Disclaimer:

    • The article includes a disclaimer that past performance is not indicative of future results and that all investments carry inherent risks.
  9. Referenced Indices:

    • The article references indices such as the S&P 500 Index, S&P Midcap 400 Index, and S&P Small Cap 600 Index, explaining their characteristics and roles in the market.

In conclusion, the article by Michael E. Schroer provides valuable insights into historical market trends, the importance of diversification, and considerations for investors in the current market environment. It encourages readers to revisit their investment strategies and explore opportunities beyond traditional indices.

The Lost Decade, Revisited - AMG Wealth (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Rubie Ullrich

Last Updated:

Views: 5626

Rating: 4.1 / 5 (52 voted)

Reviews: 91% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Rubie Ullrich

Birthday: 1998-02-02

Address: 743 Stoltenberg Center, Genovevaville, NJ 59925-3119

Phone: +2202978377583

Job: Administration Engineer

Hobby: Surfing, Sailing, Listening to music, Web surfing, Kitesurfing, Geocaching, Backpacking

Introduction: My name is Rubie Ullrich, I am a enthusiastic, perfect, tender, vivacious, talented, famous, delightful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.