KNOWLEDGE FOR POLICY
We mobilise people and resources to create, curate, make sense of and use knowledge to inform policymaking across Europe.
Publication | 2022
Ukraine and Russia are two important grain producers and exporters in the world, accounting for 12% and 17% of the world's wheat exports, respectively. The conflict between Russia and Ukraine may greatly impact Ukraine's wheat production and export as well as Russia's wheat export. Satellite observations have showed signs of wheat production reduction in Ukraine in the season 2021–2022. Considering the uncertainty of the conflict duration, we have designed three scenarios (i.e., slight, medium, and severe) depending on how the war would significantly impact the wheat harvest and trade disruption. From analysis of potential impacts of the conflict on global wheat market under the general equilibrium trade model, we have found that the conflict would lead to a trade drop (60%), soaring wheat prices (50%), and severe food insecurity with decreased purchasing power for wheat (above 30%) in the most severe scenario, especially for countries that heavily rely on wheat imports from Ukraine, such as Egypt, Turkey, Mongolia, Georgia, and Azerbaijan. Considering the role of Russia and Ukraine in agricultural input sectors including oil, natural gas, and fertilizers, especially Russia, the trade blockade caused by the conflict will give rise to price increase by 10%–30% and welfare decline by 15–25% for most affected countries. The conflict would put as many as 1.7 billion people in hunger and 276 million people in severe food insecurity. Food shortages, energy shortages and inflation have spread to many countries like dominoes which have fallen into trouble one after another with social unrest day after day. Our analysis also shows that countries including the United States, China, India, Canada, Australia, France, Argentina, and Germany would increase their wheat production and exports for the reconstruction of the global wheat supply pattern. The modeled results indicate that the conflict-induced global wheat crisis and food insecurity can be notably alleviated if these countries increase their production by 2%–3% in 2022–2023 and unnecessary trade restrictions are exempted.
Was this page useful?
Given your interest in the topic, I've got a strong background in policy analysis and geopolitical impacts on global systems, particularly concerning agricultural economics and international trade. The excerpt you've provided delves into the ramifications of the Russia-Ukraine conflict on global food security, specifically focusing on wheat production and its impact on trade dynamics. This is a complex scenario intertwining various domains like agriculture, economics, and geopolitical relationships.
The article highlights the significance of both Russia and Ukraine in global wheat production, accounting for substantial portions of the world's wheat exports. Satellite observations indicating a reduction in Ukraine's wheat production during the 2021–2022 season align with broader concerns about the conflict's influence on grain production and exports from these regions.
Moreover, the article delves into three hypothetical scenarios, projecting potential outcomes based on the conflict's intensity. It discusses the probable implications on trade disruptions, wheat prices, and food insecurity. The severity of the conflict is seen to potentially cause a substantial drop in trade (60%), a significant increase in wheat prices (50%), and severe food insecurity affecting purchasing power for wheat (over 30%) in the most extreme scenario. Countries heavily reliant on wheat imports from Ukraine, like Egypt, Turkey, Mongolia, Georgia, and Azerbaijan, could face acute challenges.
Beyond the direct impact on wheat production and trade, the analysis considers the broader repercussions on agricultural input sectors due to the trade blockade, potentially leading to price increases (10%–30%) and welfare declines (15%–25%) for most affected countries.
The article also addresses the repercussions on global geopolitics, suggesting that countries like the United States, China, India, Canada, Australia, France, Argentina, and Germany might step up their wheat production and exports to stabilize the global wheat supply pattern. A collective increase in production by these nations (2%–3%) in 2022–2023, coupled with exempting unnecessary trade restrictions, could significantly alleviate the global wheat crisis and food insecurity resulting from the conflict.
The analysis paints a bleak picture, indicating that the conflict could potentially impact up to 1.7 billion people with hunger and 276 million people facing severe food insecurity, causing widespread socio-economic issues like food and energy shortages, inflation, and social unrest across multiple countries.
The interconnectedness of various aspects - from agricultural production to trade policies, geopolitical tensions, and global food security - showcases the complexity of the situation and the potential ripple effects that a regional conflict can have on a global scale.
