Stop Banks Funding Climate Chaos - Rainforest Action Network (2024)

Banks are fueling the climate crisis.

Here’s the deal: Massive-scale burning of the earth’s resources, like precious forests and dirty fossil fuels, is driving our climate to a state of chaos.

And while the reducing, recycling, and reusing of everyday folks do add up, it’s the overall system and those at the top that are destroying our future. If we’re looking for people to blame, our fingers should be pointed at the corporations that exploit these resources for profit, more specifically, big banks.

Just 100 companies were responsible for more than 70% of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions between 1988 and 2015. But fossil fuel companies can’t destroy the planet without outside help, and they get A LOT of help. Banks give money to fossil fuel companies so more coal, oil, and gas can be extracted, more pipelines can be built, and more money will line the pockets of a few corporate executives.

In our Banking on Climate Change report, we exposed the world’s biggest banks for directly funding the climate crisis. Since 2016, 35 banks have poured $2.7 trillion into fossil fuels. Big banks have epically failed to respond to the climate crisis. Fossil fuel finance is destroying the climate, and against all logic, compassion, and understanding of Indigenous rights, global banks are increasing funding for dirty energy.

Which bank is the #1 funder of fossil fuels?

Stop Banks Funding Climate Chaos - Rainforest Action Network (1)

It’s clear that banks must take responsibility and play a big part in initiating the just transition away from fossil fuels, and it’s up to us to push these banks to take necessary action. So we’ve started with the biggest and baddest of them all: JPMorgan Chase.

In fact, Chase is the world’s worst banker of climate chaos by FAR. Chase has dumped over a quarter TRILLION dollars into fossil fuels in the last four years alone, continuing to fuel the flames of climate destruction.

To put this in perspective, Chase’s overall financing of fossil fuels in 2016-2019 is a shocking 36% higher than the second-placed bank, Wells Fargo.

On top of that, JPMorgan Chase’s $102 billion in finance for fossil fuel expansion is 43% higher than that of Citi, in distant second place.

Chase violates Indigenous Rights.

Chase has been a consistent bad actor, funding fossil fuel expansion projects that devastate the environment and violate human rights, particularly Indigenous rights.

Indigenous peoples are among those experiencing impacts from a changing climate first and worst. At the same time, they are at the forefront of movements around the world to protect land, air, and water from fossil fuel production.

Indigenous peoples are leading the fights against major fossil fuel projects

From the Trans Mountain pipeline, to the Coastal GasLink pipeline, to the Keystone XL pipelines –– Indigenous peoples are leading the fights against major fossil fuel projects that would mean decades more of fossil fuel expansion. The roots of the climate crisis and the exploitation of land for natural resources are issues Indigenous peoples have been speaking out against for hundreds of years.

The banks supporting the fossil fuel industry have a responsibility to avoid financing projects and companies that violate Indigenous rights, including in particular treaty rights, religious rights and the right to require free, prior, and informed consent for development that impacts them. Unfortunately, JPMorgan Chase and other banks backed companies like Enbridge, which is trying to build the Line 3 tar sands pipeline despite explicit opposition by impacted Indigenous nations.

Chase must put people and planet over profits and respect Indigenous treaties and rights.

The Solution: Chase must defund climate change

To address the root causes of climate change, we must stop fossil fuels from being extracted and burned and keep our forests intact. To do that, we have to push financial institutions, like Chase, to stop funding these projects and companies once and for all.

And let’s be clear, Chase is capable of changing course. Over RAN’s history, we’ve seen massive corporations and banks shift gears to projects that put people and planet over profit. Not only can they do it, this is what needs to be done in order to ensure a livable future.

And it’s already happening. In February 2020, Chase released a new fossil fuel policy because of the pressure of RAN supporters and partners. Chase has cut back its funding of coal, dumped the financing of Arctic oil and gas projects, and demoted Lee Raymond, a known climate change denier, from his leadership position on the board of directors. But, this recent climate policy falls FAR short of what’s needed to prevent a climate crisis Chase has financed for decades.

It’s time for Chase to take responsibility for the climate destruction it’s fueled. Until it does, we’ll continue to make Chase bank synonymous with climate change: We’ll keep protesting at its branches, and we’ll keep building the people power to end profit-driven climate chaos.

Fossil fuel policies continue to be released, and these institutions know that the tide is changing. Even Chase’s own economists warn of “catastrophic consequences” if emissions aren’t slashed over the next 30 years. Banks are responsible for the climate crisis and should now listen carefully to the frontline and Indigenous communities who know what’s best for people and planet.

Business as usual in financing fossil fuels is no longer acceptable, take action and demand Chase defund climate change.

Stop Banks Funding Climate Chaos - Rainforest Action Network (3)

Stop Banks Funding Climate Chaos - Rainforest Action Network (2024)

FAQs

Stop Banks Funding Climate Chaos - Rainforest Action Network? ›

Since 2016, 35 banks have poured $2.7 trillion into fossil fuels and dirty energy. It's time for Wall Street to defund climate change for good, because business, as usual, isn't going to cut it anymore. We demand that big banks stop violating human rights, clearing forests, and destroying the climate.

What banks don't support fossil fuels? ›

The following US institutions have received a Fossil Free Certification, which means that these financial institutions will not lend to fossil fuel companies or projects.
  • Amalgamated Bank.
  • Atmos Financial.
  • Beneficial State Bank.
  • Clean Energy Credit Union.
  • Climate First Bank.
  • Self-Help Credit Union.
  • Virginia Community Capital.
Aug 29, 2023

Is Ran Banking on climate chaos? ›

New figures published by NGO the Rainforest Action Network (RAN) in its annual 'Banking on Climate Chaos' report reveal that the world's 60 largest banks by asset size, the majority (49) of which have made net-zero commitments, have invested $5.5trn dollars in the fossil fuel industry since the Paris Agreement was ...

Who are the biggest funders of fossil fuels? ›

But since the Paris Agreement came into effect in 2016, JPMorgan Chase has been the largest single financier of fossil fuels, at a total of $434 billion. Fellow U.S. banks Citi, Wells Fargo, and Bank of America round out the top five since 2016.

Who is the biggest lender to oil and gas? ›

The report shows that overall, U.S. banks dominate fossil fuel financing, accounting for 28% of all fossil fuel financing in 2022. JPMorgan Chase remains the world's worst funder of climate chaos since the Paris Agreement. Citi, Wells Fargo, and Bank of America are still among the top 5 fossil financiers since 2016.

Which banks are the worst for climate change? ›

The report shows that overall, U.S. banks dominate fossil fuel financing, accounting for 28% of all fossil fuel financing in 2022. JPMorgan Chase remains the world's worst funder of climate chaos since the Paris Agreement. Citi, Wells Fargo, and Bank of America are still among the top 5 fossil financiers since 2016.

Who is the most ethical Bank? ›

These six providers rank highly on the ethical stakes.
  • Triodos Bank. Triodos Bank, a B-Corp company, sits firmly at the top of our list of ethical current accounts. ...
  • Nationwide. ...
  • Cumberland Building Society. ...
  • Engage. ...
  • Monzo. ...
  • Starling Bank.
Sep 14, 2023

What is the controversy with the Green Climate Fund? ›

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) has an “underdeveloped” approach to managing project risks because it misses key issues, lacks coherence and makes it difficult to know who is responsible, according to its latest performance review.

Are banks to blame for the financial crisis? ›

The Biggest Culprit: The Lenders

Most of the blame is on the mortgage originators or the lenders. That's because they were responsible for creating these problems. After all, the lenders were the ones who advanced loans to people with poor credit and a high risk of default. 7 Here's why that happened.

Will major U.S. banks participate in climate scenario exercise? ›

On September 29, 2022, the Federal Reserve Board (FRB) announced that six of the largest US banks1, which includes Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman, JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, and Wells Fargo, will be pioneers to a climate scenario-analysis exercise.

What banks have divested from fossil fuels? ›

2023 list of sustainable banks and credit unions
  • Alamerica Bank (HQ: Alabama) | Impact: Fossil fuel-free | See profile | Website.
  • MariSol Federal Credit Union (HQ: Arizona) | Impact: Fossil fuel-free | See profile | Website.
  • Southern Bancorp (HQ: Arkansas) | Impact: B-Corp, GABV | See profile | Website | Get started now.

Does Wells Fargo support fossil fuels? ›

WFC is the world's third largest funder of fossil fuels, providing $271 billion in lending and underwriting to fossil fuel companies during 2016-2021, including $37 billion to 100 top companies engaged in new fossil fuel exploration and development.

Does US Bank invest in fossil fuels? ›

U.S. Bank claims to take climate change seriously, yet they continue to provide billions of dollars in financing to the fossil fuel industry, including extensive financing for Enbridge Energy, the company behind the Alberta Clipper tar sands pipeline.

Does Bank of America support fossil fuel? ›

The total financing for fossil fuels by the top 60 global banks between 2016 and 2021 was $4.6 trillion. Of this amount, just four banks — Chase, Citi, Bank of America and Wells Fargo — have financed a staggering one quarter of this total. These banks are funding climate destruction globally.

Does US Bank support fossil fuels? ›

U.S. Bank claims to take climate change seriously, yet they continue to provide billions of dollars in financing to the fossil fuel industry, including extensive financing for Enbridge Energy, the company behind the Alberta Clipper tar sands pipeline.

Does Wells Fargo invest in fossil fuels? ›

Funding more climate chaos

Perhaps the most troubling trend is the financing by JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo, which increased their fossil fuel funding since 2020 by $9.98 billion and $19.57 billion respectively.

Does Bank of America contribute to fossil fuels? ›

At the top of that list is JPMorgan Chase, the largest funder of fossil fuels cumulatively since the Paris Agreement on climate change was signed in 2016, according to the report. Citi, Wells Fargo, and Bank of America are also among the top five fossil financiers since 2016, the report found.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Jonah Leffler

Last Updated:

Views: 5542

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (45 voted)

Reviews: 84% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Jonah Leffler

Birthday: 1997-10-27

Address: 8987 Kieth Ports, Luettgenland, CT 54657-9808

Phone: +2611128251586

Job: Mining Supervisor

Hobby: Worldbuilding, Electronics, Amateur radio, Skiing, Cycling, Jogging, Taxidermy

Introduction: My name is Jonah Leffler, I am a determined, faithful, outstanding, inexpensive, cheerful, determined, smiling person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.