Russia could carry out attacks in space, warns British Armed Forces head Tony Radakin (2024)

Russia could wage war in space against the West, the head of the Armed Forces has warned.

Admiral Sir Tony Radakin cautioned that Russia could “disrupt” domains away from the traditional land warfare seen in Ukraine, including both sub surface and in the skies.

“It has capabilities in space,” Sir Tony said. “We saw an example of that at the tail end of last year, when Russia exploded an object in space which created immense debris. Russia has nuclear capabilities, Russia has underwater capabilities.”

The Chief of the Defence Staff made the comments after President Putin was accused of sabotaging Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines with undersea explosions that caused four leaks and “unprecedented” damage.

Although Sir Tony refused to blame Russia while an investigation into the explosions was ongoing, he warned: “Russia has the ability to disrupt in other areas in addition to what it’s doing in Ukraine, what it’s doing in energy and what it’s doing in these diplomatic and information battles.”

Russia has significant anti-satellite capabilities, and last November tested a ground-based missile that brought down one of its own satellites some 300 miles above the earth. In 2020 Moscow was accused by the UK and US of firing a missile in space with the characteristics of a weapon.

Prof Malcolm Chalmers, deputy director general of the Royal United Services Institute think tank, said that if Russia were to destroy satellites the impact would be felt “throughout the world”.

“Russia could also attack the GPS systems which play a key role, both military and civilian, throughout the world,” he said. “There could be some disruption to civilian services, such as sat-nav systems used in most of our phones and cars.”

He noted that similar to the sabotage of pipelines, the destruction of satellites involves “neither direct casualties nor an attack on another country’s territory,” and is therefore less likely to provoke a direct Western military response.

However, Sir Tony insisted if Russia did attack critical national infrastructure, either in underwater sea cables - of which over 95 per cent of the world’s information is circulated - or in space, it would provoke a strong response from Nato nations.

Sir Tony insisted that despite the multitude of threats from Russia the UK “should have the confidence that our lives will be safe and secure, our economies will be protected and we should have the resolve, sometimes we might have to take some short term pressures but we are going to overcome the pressure that Russia is trying to impose on our lives”.

In an interview with The Telegraph on board HMS Queen Elizabeth at the Atlantic Future Forum in New York, Sir Tony welcomed the Government’s recent commitment to increase defence spending to three per cent of GDP by 2030.

He added that the current “mood music” was to spend more on defending critical national infrastructure. He also cited the Royal Navy’s recent procurement of a ship dedicated to that role as an example of how UK defence wishes “to get down deeper to both monitor and be able to tackle some of the threats that exist in the deep ocean with those cables”.

Earlier this month Mr Putin warned that he was not bluffing on the use of nuclear weapons when he ordered partial mobilisation of 300,000 reservists in a desperate bid to turn the war in Ukraine in his favour.

Sir Tony gave short shrift to the mobilisation, dismissing the notion that an army created through conscription could succeed, questioning how this could be an “effective fighting force against a Ukrainian army that is fighting with all the spirit and determination and confidence when they are fighting for their land, for their futures, and some of these conscripts from Russia don’t even know where they are going, what they are fighting for”.

For all of Mr Putin’s rhetoric, Sir Tony insisted that “Russia does not want a nuclear war”.

“Russia does not want a war with Nato,” he said. “Russia doesn’t want to strengthen the international resolve even more strongly than it already is because that creates even bigger problems for Russia in the here and now.”

He cited the diplomatic response seen since Russia invaded Ukraine in February, with the majority of western nations “deploring” Mr Putin’s behaviour. “Countries are adjusting their energy policies so that they buy less energy from Russia this year and they will look to wean themselves off Russian energy in future years,” he said. “That’s important because the battle lines are not just on the physical territory in Ukraine.”

Sir Tony said Nato countries showing a united front was a huge incentive for the people of Ukraine.

“When the world comes together … that helps these brave people in Ukraine fight for their country,” he said, adding that it also means “President Putin’s ambitions will fail and that is why you are seeing the weakness in the Russian plans and how they are being defeated”.

While much has been made of Mr Putin’s “deranged” mindset, Sir Tony was more cautious: “He is behaving in a rational way for President Putin, rather than an irrational actor”. He said Mr Putin’s behaviour was “not totally random and reckless”.

“He is constrained in what he can do because of the way we can respond and the way Ukraine is fighting and he doesn’t want to strengthen the international resolve,” he said, adding: “He’s at a point of weakness.”

This “weakness” comes from Russia having been “defeated in its ambition” with how it foresaw its “special operation unfolding. Instead, Sir Tony reels off Mr Putin’s failures since the invasion, including its inability to take key Ukrainian cities, having been “ejected off” Snake Island and had its capital ship, Moskva, sunk in the Black Sea. “Those are impactful defeats on Russia,” he said.

Whilst the conflict in Ukraine continues to worry Sir Tony – he describes it as a “despicable, horrible war” – he takes some level of comfort from the fact that Russia is clearly “failing in its objectives in Ukraine” and has not succeeded in having the West “cower” to them.

Asked if he felt cautiously optimistic about the trajectory of the war in Ukraine, Sir Tony said that he did. “That’s a product of seeing how Ukraine responded at the very outset, seeing the calamitous way that Russia has prosecuted this war, seeing the international response, seeing the way that Ukraine has been able to shift its tactics.”

As an expert in military and geopolitical affairs, it is evident from the information provided in the article that the head of the UK Armed Forces, Admiral Sir Tony Radakin, is expressing concerns about Russia's potential for waging war in space against the West. This assessment is based on his extensive knowledge of Russia's capabilities, as well as recent events that demonstrate Russia's strategic intentions and actions.

Sir Tony highlights Russia's capabilities in various domains, including space, sub-surface, and the skies. He refers to a specific incident where Russia exploded an object in space, resulting in significant debris. Additionally, he emphasizes Russia's nuclear and underwater capabilities, suggesting a multifaceted threat beyond traditional land warfare.

The article mentions Russia's significant anti-satellite capabilities, citing a ground-based missile test conducted in November that successfully brought down one of its own satellites. This demonstrates Russia's ability to potentially disrupt satellite communications, including GPS systems, which are crucial for both military and civilian applications worldwide.

The potential impact of Russia destroying satellites is discussed by Professor Malcolm Chalmers, deputy director general of the Royal United Services Institute think tank. He notes that such an action could have global repercussions, affecting civilian services like GPS systems in phones and cars, as well as military operations.

Sir Tony emphasizes that if Russia were to attack critical national infrastructure, whether in underwater sea cables or in space, it would provoke a strong response from NATO nations. He underscores the importance of defending against threats in deep ocean areas, as exemplified by the Royal Navy's recent procurement of a dedicated ship for that purpose.

Despite the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, Sir Tony expresses confidence that the UK should have the resolve to overcome the pressures imposed by Russia. He acknowledges the importance of a united front among NATO countries and emphasizes that Russia's ambitions are failing in Ukraine.

In terms of Russia's overall strategy, Sir Tony rejects the notion that Russia wants a nuclear war or a war with NATO. He sees President Putin's behavior as rational within the constraints of international responses and Ukraine's determined resistance. Sir Tony attributes Russia's current perceived weakness to its defeats in key areas since the invasion of Ukraine.

In summary, the information in the article highlights the expertise of Admiral Sir Tony Radakin and his insights into the potential threats posed by Russia, particularly in space and other unconventional domains. The assessment is supported by specific incidents and capabilities that demonstrate Russia's strategic intentions and actions in the geopolitical landscape.

Russia could carry out attacks in space, warns British Armed Forces head Tony Radakin (2024)

FAQs

Could NATO defeat Russia? ›

Nato would defeat Russia quickly, looking to the future and more: Five key points from CDS' speech. Vladimir Putin doesn't want a conflict with Nato because he knows Russia would "lose quickly", according to the head of the UK Armed Forces as he hailed the alliance's strength.

What is the remaining military strength of Russia? ›

The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, commonly referred to as the Russian Armed Forces, are the military of Russia. In terms of active-duty personnel, they are the world's fifth-largest military force, with 1.15 million and at least two million reserve personnel.

What is the military status of Russia? ›

It ranks fifth by active military personnel, which was measured at over 830 thousand, following China, India, the United States, and North Korea. After the dissolution of the USSR, Russian troops were deployed in the Russian region of Chechnya, as well as in Georgia, Syria, and Ukraine, among other territories.

Could NATO beat Russia without USA? ›

Russia couldn't defeat NATO, even without US help. Actually the rest of NATO combined have a larger military than the USA. The USA make up 41% of NATO, which means 59% percent of NATO forces are from Europe and Canada. It's probably more now that Finland are a member.

Who has the second strongest military in NATO? ›

The geographical location of Turkey, the gateway between Europe and Asia, makes it one of the most strategically powerful countries in the world. Turkey has been a member of NATO since 1952, and with a strength of 3,55,000 active armed personnel, it has the second-largest military in the alliance.

Who has the strongest military in the world? ›

United States

Is ww3 happening? ›

Defence experts believe that the current situation is not World War 3 but rather an “aggressive cold war" or a “regional war". Experts shed light on when World War 3 can officially be declared.

What country is most powerful from NATO? ›

The United States is often regarded as having one of the strongest military forces within NATO.

What does Z mean on Russian tanks? ›

Due to its association with the war in Ukraine, the Z has become a militarist symbol in Russian propaganda and is used by Russian civilians to indicate support for the invasion, further adopted later by Russian far-right organizations.

How many soldiers does Russia have left? ›

Russia's armed forces now have around 1.1 million active troops across all branches, according to the International Institute for Strategic Studies' 2024 Military Balance database, 500,000 of which are in the army. Moscow has another 1.5 million people in reserve across all services.

How many soldiers does Ukraine have left? ›

Armed Forces of Ukraine
Ukrainian Armed Forces
Active personnel1,000,000+ (2024)
Reserve personnel2,000,000 (2024)
Expenditures
Budget$45 billion (2024) foreign military aid
22 more rows

How long can Russia sustain war? ›

The authors concluded Russia could sustain its current rate of attrition for up to three years and maybe longer. The report also detailed how, despite international sanctions, Russia's economy had proved resilient and it had ramped up defense spending for 2024.

Who has biggest army in the world? ›

The 50 Largest Armies In The World
RankStateActive Military Personnel
1People's Republic of China2,185,000
2India1,455,550
3United States1,328,000
4Russia1,320,000
46 more rows
Feb 12, 2024

Where does China rank in military power? ›

The Global Firepower Index, 2023, puts the US at the top, Russia at the second spot, China at No. 3, and India at No. 4.

Is NATO the most powerful? ›

The secretary said the alliance remains unwavering two years into Russia's unprovoked invasion of Ukraine and commended Stoltenberg for his leadership in keeping NATO united and resolute in facing the challenge. "NATO is the most powerful and successful alliance in history," Austin said.

Would the British army beat Russia? ›

No. UK's force is around 74,000 right now, simply too small to defeat Russia, even if it's a better trained and better armed military than Russia.

Could there be a World War 3? ›

The various global military conflicts that have occurred since the start of the 21st century, most recently the Syrian civil war since 2011, the Russian invasion of Ukraine since 2022, alongside recent rising tensions between the United States and China, have been perceived as potential flashpoints or triggers for a ...

Did Russia ever want to join NATO? ›

NATO-Russia Council

In 2000 Putin told George Robertson, the Secretary General of NATO at that time, that he wanted Russia to join NATO but would not like to go through the usual application process.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Roderick King

Last Updated:

Views: 6787

Rating: 4 / 5 (71 voted)

Reviews: 86% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Roderick King

Birthday: 1997-10-09

Address: 3782 Madge Knoll, East Dudley, MA 63913

Phone: +2521695290067

Job: Customer Sales Coordinator

Hobby: Gunsmithing, Embroidery, Parkour, Kitesurfing, Rock climbing, Sand art, Beekeeping

Introduction: My name is Roderick King, I am a cute, splendid, excited, perfect, gentle, funny, vivacious person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.