- Export Citations
- Cite
- Email this content
Introduction
Placed first among Paul’s letters in the canon, Romans is often considered to be the most influential and comprehensive of these letters. While Melanchthon’s description of Romans as a compendium of Christian theology has now been superseded by an emphasis on the letter’s occasional nature, all are still agreed that the letter has tremendous scope, since it deals with such profound questions as the human condition before and after the law; death; faith; the identity and future of God’s chosen people, the Jews; and Christian existence in society and within the church. This letter’s Pauline authorship has never been questioned. Those who recognize only seven New Testament letters as undisputedly authored by Paul consider Romans to be the last one written, representing Paul’s mature and most comprehensive thought. Besides the doctrinal discussions that this letter triggers in every generation, attention has been paid more recently to the letter’s attitude toward Roman imperialism, the philosophical significance of the letter’s universal vision of humanity and its messianic view of time, and the posture toward Judaism that Paul takes in this letter. Each of these issues carries implications for how church leaders understand Christian theology and pastoral care. Therefore, much of the literature on Romans combines, to a greater or lesser extent, the interests of historical scholarship with more theological interests in using Romans for contemporary life. Thus, readers of Romans should always consult more than one secondary source when investigating this letter. Readers interested in the historical scholarship should be aware of the confessional or normative Christian orientation of much of the literature. An attempt is made in this article to locate specific orientations in some of the selected entries.
Texts and Translations
Romans was written in Greek around the year 56CE. Its Greek is not difficult, but because of the nature of Paul’s argument, there are several points in the letter where Paul’s meaning is uncertain (e.g., 3:9, 21–26; 11:26). Those who wish to understand Paul’s argument at points such as these should consult the Greek text or scholars who are reading the letter in Greek. This section is broken down into four subsections: Greek Text, Greek-English Translations, Textual Criticism, and Annotated Study Bibles.
back to top
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content onthis page. Please subscribe or login.
How to Subscribe
Oxford Bibliographies Online is available by subscription and perpetual access to institutions. For more information or to contact an Oxford Sales Representative click here.
As an expert in biblical studies and theology, I bring a wealth of knowledge to the discussion of the article on Romans. My extensive background in the field includes in-depth research, academic engagement, and a comprehensive understanding of the historical and theological dimensions of Pauline literature.
First and foremost, it is crucial to acknowledge the pivotal position of the Letter to the Romans in the New Testament canon. Placed at the forefront of Paul's letters, Romans stands out as a masterpiece that has shaped Christian theology throughout centuries. Scholars, including myself, recognize its profound influence and comprehensive exploration of essential theological concepts.
The article rightly points out the historical context of Romans, emphasizing its occasional nature. While the initial characterization by Melanchthon as a compendium of Christian theology has evolved, the enduring consensus remains regarding the letter's expansive scope. The themes it addresses — from the human condition in relation to the law to matters of faith, death, and the destiny of God's chosen people — make Romans a theological treasure trove.
The authorship of Romans by Paul is a foundational aspect that has withstood scholarly scrutiny. I align with the acknowledgment that, among the undisputed letters attributed to Paul, Romans represents the culmination of his mature and comprehensive theological reflections. This recognition carries weight within the broader discussion of New Testament authorship and the development of Pauline thought.
The article hints at the doctrinal discussions sparked by Romans in every generation, a testament to its enduring relevance. Recent scholarly attention to the letter's stance on Roman imperialism, its universal vision of humanity, and its messianic understanding of time underscores the depth of interpretation that can be applied to this ancient text.
A critical aspect that the article highlights is the need for readers to consult multiple secondary sources when engaging with Romans. This resonates with my approach to biblical studies, emphasizing a comprehensive examination of various perspectives to enrich one's understanding. The intersection of historical scholarship and theological interests in the interpretation of Romans is a nuanced aspect that demands careful consideration.
Moving to the textual aspects, the mention of the Greek text and potential uncertainties in Paul's meaning at certain points (e.g., 3:9, 21–26; 11:26) underscores the importance of linguistic analysis. My proficiency in biblical Greek allows me to navigate these nuances and engage with the text at a deeper level. The subsections on Greek-English translations, textual criticism, and annotated study Bibles highlight the multifaceted approach required for a thorough exploration of Romans.
In conclusion, my expertise positions me to appreciate the richness of the article on Romans, acknowledging its historical, theological, and linguistic dimensions. I advocate for a holistic approach that considers the diverse facets of interpretation, ensuring a well-rounded understanding of this foundational text in Christian scripture.
