Retirement Savings Will Be Next ‘4th Rail,’ and It Will Be Beautiful (2024)

The story keeps writing itself. In 2018 I published a book titled The End of Work. Sadly, my working and more appropriate title (The End of Laziness) was nixed by the publisher. Whatever the title, the book’s thesis stands: work is evolving in a wondrous way whereby jobs will increasingly reflect the unique skills and intelligence of the individual. Laziness is set to decline in concert with much better compensated work that we can’t get enough of.

Why does the story keep writing itself? It does because it’s difficult to pick up a newspaper these days without reading about well-paid jobs that have so little to do with back-breaking work. Losing your hair? There’s a job for you. The New York Times recently reported on a lack of hirsute qualities bringing with it potential riches. Yes, those willing to chronicle their fight against looming hair loss online, and who are willing to showcase the products used in their battle, are increasingly well-paid for doing so.

This is the genius of a globalized work force in concert with a globalized force of doing and thinking machines. The more that life’s necessities and luxuries are produced in massively abundant fashion born of work divided by machines, the more that humans can exit traditional production in favor of work they can’t get enough of. In The End of Work, the prediction was made that “Entertainment Economy” will follow the agrarian, manufacturing and service economies that came before it. We will do what we’re good at, and that we can’t get enough of.

What this signals is that retirement as a goal and an age will more and more have dated qualities. If work can be about the individual, including the individual’s interest in his own hair loss, video games, and – yes – sleep, the 65-year old age of retirement will render the telephone booth modern by comparison.

Instead of working until we can afford to stop working, today’s and tomorrow’s workers will work until they can’t work anymore. “Senior citizen” will on its own elicit quizzical stares from people simply because “seniors” will be working happily alongside their juniors.

The view here is that these truths have been wholly glossed over by retirement alarmists. And if you’re curious what a retirement alarmist is, simply Google “retirement crisis.” If your computer doesn’t explode (a joke stolen from the great Christopher Buckley who was referencing “Russian corruption”) in response to the search, you will soon be able to scroll pages for the rest of your days full of links to alarmist commentary asserting with utter certitude that Americans don’t have enough retirement savings.

Such a view presumes, as most alarmist views do, that markets are stupid. The people are the market, and those getting closer to the dated notion of “retirement age” are the retirement market. That they allegedly don’t have enough in the way of savings is a powerful market signal suggesting that they don’t need to save in the way that they used to. They don’t simply because they have no intention of exiting the workforce in the way that seniors formerly did at the age of 65.

Where taxes come in is that people understandably do want to have money put away for the future, and better yet, they know the genius of compound returns much better than their self-appointed nannies think they do. With the latter in mind, and with the desire of tomorrow’s seniors to redefine the age at which one becomes a senior, it’s apparent that they’ll want to expose what they have saved and intend to save for retirement to the wonders of compound interest for much, much longer. Think about it.

And in thinking about it, stop and apply the wonders of compound interest to savings that, instead of them being taxed starting at age 65, are delayed until age 85 or later. Suddenly what was never a crisis as is, is turned on its head in prosperous fashion.

With the nature of work changing for the much better such that we will work much longer, forced withdrawal of and taxation of savings meant to fund a retirement that we will fight with all of our being will rally those fighting to work longer. In short, watch interest in Social Security decline as our interest in maximizing our private savings soars. This is the looming 4th rail of politics, and it’s a beautiful one.

Get the best of Forbesto your inbox with the latest insights from experts across the globe.

Follow me onTwitter.

John Tamny

I'm President of the Parkview Institute, editor of RealClearMarkets, a senior fellow at the Market Institute, and a senior economic adviser to Applied Finance Advisors. I'm also the author of seven books. My next, coming out in April of 2024 and co-authored with Jack Ryan, is titled Bringing Adam Smith Into the American Home: A Case Against Homeownership. The most recently released is The Money Confusion (All Seasons Press, 2022). Others are When Politicians Panicked,They're Both Wrong (AIER, 2019), The End of Work (Regnery, 2018), , Who Needs the Fed? (Encounter, 2016) and Popular Economics (Regnery, 2015).

Read MoreRead Less

Editorial StandardsCorrectionsReprints & Permissions

Retirement Savings Will Be Next ‘4th Rail,’ and It Will Be Beautiful (2024)

FAQs

How long will money last using 4% rule? ›

This rule is based on research finding that if you invested at least 50% of your money in stocks and the rest in bonds, you'd have a strong likelihood of being able to withdraw an inflation-adjusted 4% of your nest egg every year for 30 years (and possibly longer, depending on your investment return over that time).

What is the average retirement savings? ›

What is the average and median retirement savings? The average retirement savings for all families is $333,940 according to the 2022 Survey of Consumer Finances.

How long will 500k last in retirement? ›

Yes, it is possible to retire comfortably on $500k. This amount allows for an annual withdrawal of $20,000 from the age of 60 to 85, covering 25 years. If $20,000 a year, or $1,667 a month, meets your lifestyle needs, then $500k is enough for your retirement.

What is the reverse 4 rule for retirement? ›

Instead of multiplying your total nest egg by 4%, divide your withdrawals or contributions by 4% and you can get a sense of how much a specific financial decision can affect your future retirement lifestyle and security.

How many people have $1000000 in retirement savings? ›

However, not a huge percentage of retirees end up having that much money. In fact, statistically, around 10% of retirees have $1 million or more in savings.

What is the average 401k balance for a 65 year old? ›

$232,710

How much does the average 70 year old have in savings? ›

The Federal Reserve also measures median and mean (average) savings across other types of financial assets. According to the data, the average 70-year-old has approximately: $60,000 in transaction accounts (including checking and savings) $127,000 in certificate of deposit (CD) accounts.

How many people have $2000000 in savings? ›

Among the 47 million households headed by someone age 60 or older, 7% had household investable assets of at least $2 million, Drinkwater said. Only 6% of the 89 million households in the U.S. headed by someone 40 to 85 years old has that amount, Drinkwater said.

How long will $900 000 last in retirement? ›

Yes, it is possible to retire very comfortably on $900k. This allows for an annual withdrawal of around $36,000 from age 60 to 85, covering 25 years. If $36,000 per year or $3,000 per month meets your lifestyle needs, $900k should be plenty for retirement.

Can I retire at 62 with $400,000 in 401k? ›

If you have $400,000 in the bank you can retire early at age 62, but it will be tight. The good news is that if you can keep working for just five more years, you are on track for a potentially quite comfortable retirement by full retirement age.

What is a good monthly retirement income? ›

As a result, an oft-stated rule of thumb suggests workers can base their retirement on a percentage of their current income. “Seventy to 80% of pre-retirement income is good to shoot for,” said Ben Bakkum, senior investment strategist with New York City financial firm Betterment, in an email.

Where can I retire on $2000 a month in the United States? ›

5 US Cities Where You Can Retire on $2,000 a Month
  • Chiang Mai, Thailand. Advantages: Very inexpensive. ...
  • San Juan, Puerto Rico. Advantage: In the United States. ...
  • Claremont, New Hampshire. A couple who found a place to retire on $2,000 per month. ...
  • Decatur, Indiana. Advantages: Potentially low rent. ...
  • El Paso, Texas.
Mar 19, 2024

What is the $1000 a month rule for retirement? ›

One example is the $1,000/month rule. Created by Wes Moss, a Certified Financial Planner, this strategy helps individuals visualize how much savings they should have in retirement. According to Moss, you should plan to have $240,000 saved for every $1,000 of disposable income in retirement.

How long will $1 million last in retirement? ›

In more than 20 U.S. states, a million-dollar nest egg can cover retirees' living expenses for at least 20 years, a new analysis shows. It's worth noting that most Americans are nowhere near having that much money socked away.

What are the flaws of the 4% rule? ›

The 4% rule is a reasonable baseline, but it also has serious drawbacks. Among them: Retirees often want to vary their spending during retirement. Many people don't retire for three decades. Market conditions affect how much you can safely withdraw.

How long will $4 million last in retirement? ›

Like any basic rule of thumb, this one comes with plenty of qualifications and exceptions, but it can be a useful place to start. Now, 4% of $4 million is $160,000, so as long as you expect your retirement to last for about 30 years and that amount sounds like enough-or more than enough-for you, you're in a good place.

How long will money last using 5% rule? ›

The historical analysis shows that, over a 25-year retirement period, a 5.0% withdrawal rate has worked 90% of the time. On the other hand, if you are retiring at age 60 or have a family history of longevity, you may want to plan for a 35-year retirement.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Corie Satterfield

Last Updated:

Views: 5928

Rating: 4.1 / 5 (42 voted)

Reviews: 81% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Corie Satterfield

Birthday: 1992-08-19

Address: 850 Benjamin Bridge, Dickinsonchester, CO 68572-0542

Phone: +26813599986666

Job: Sales Manager

Hobby: Table tennis, Soapmaking, Flower arranging, amateur radio, Rock climbing, scrapbook, Horseback riding

Introduction: My name is Corie Satterfield, I am a fancy, perfect, spotless, quaint, fantastic, funny, lucky person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.