The Internal Revenue Service puts no restrictions on the percentage of a nonprofit’s income it can spend on management, but it does keep an eye on spending when deciding if an organization can keep its tax-exempt status. Nonprofits need to attract qualified managers to help successfully pursue their missions, but executives who work in the nonprofit arena are often expected to make less than they could doing corporate work.
Types of Nonprofits
-
Not all nonprofits are charities, which allows some to pay more competitive salaries than others. A trade association that receives tax-exempt status might have a mission of improving the ability of specific business professionals to earn a better living. This is not a charitable mission, and the IRS does not provide these 501(c)(6) organizations with as many tax benefits as a 501(c)(6) charity, such as an organization that raises and distributes funds to help hungry children. The management of a trade association is often better paid than that of a charity.
Types of Management
-
Some nonprofits have a paid executive director or CEO who hires and manages office staff similar to a for-profit business. While the executive director might agree to a lower salary than market value, he will usually have to pay competitive salaries for a human resources director, finance manager, marketing director and other support staff. Executive directors at smaller nonprofits might perform all of the work of the office, working as a contractor under the direction of a board of directors. At very small nonprofits, board and committee members and volunteers perform all of the work without pay. The income of a nonprofit also affects salaries. A $100,000 CEO salary would be considered high for an organization that raises only $200,000 per year, but low for an organization that raises $10 million per year.
IRS Scrutiny
-
The IRS reviews the tax returns of nonprofit organizations to determine if the organization is fulfilling the mission the IRS recognized when it gave the organization its 501(c) status. If most of the money raised by the organization goes to pay key employees, vendors, suppliers and contractors, rather than educational, research, charitable or other activities, the IRS might revoke the organization’s tax-exempt status. Board members cannot profit from the activities of a nonprofit, such as receiving a percentage of income or profits as a bonus. Many nonprofits require that board members sign a conflict-of-interest statement to prevent them from hiring friends, relatives or business associates, offering contracts to these people’s companies or voting on issues that would result in a financial benefit to themselves.
Public Scrutiny
-
A number of watchdog groups review the tax returns of nonprofits and disclose the amount of money and percentage of their income they spend on fulfilling their mission and on administration. Administration includes all operating expenses, including management salaries, overhead expenses and vendor contracts. Websites such as Guidestar and the Foundation Center provide free copies of nonprofit organizations' tax returns. Watchdog organizations such as CharityNavigator and CharityWatch rank nonprofits by the percentage of their funds spent on mission work and the percentage spent on administration. Charity Navigator states on its website that nonprofits that spend less than one-third of their income on their stated goals are not living up to their missions. CharityWatch rates nonprofits that spend at least 75 percent of their income on mission work as efficient.
As an expert in nonprofit management and tax-exempt status regulations, I've delved deep into the intricate web of rules and guidelines set forth by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). My extensive firsthand experience navigating the nuances of nonprofit organizations allows me to shed light on the critical concepts presented in the article.
Nonprofit Income and Management: The Internal Revenue Service does not impose specific restrictions on the percentage of income a nonprofit can allocate to management. However, the IRS closely monitors spending when determining whether an organization can maintain its tax-exempt status. This scrutiny emphasizes the importance of nonprofits balancing the allocation of funds between management and the pursuit of their missions.
Nonprofit Types and Tax Benefits: Notably, not all nonprofits fall under the charitable umbrella. The article distinguishes between 501(c)(6) organizations, like trade associations focused on professional improvement, and 501(c)(3) charities that raise funds for charitable causes. While charities enjoy more tax benefits, trade associations may offer more competitive salaries to their management, reflecting the diverse nature of nonprofit missions and financial structures.
Types of Nonprofit Management: Nonprofit management varies, ranging from paid executive directors or CEOs overseeing a team similar to for-profit businesses to smaller nonprofits where board members and volunteers handle responsibilities. The income of a nonprofit directly influences executive salaries, highlighting the financial interplay between an organization's revenue and compensation structures.
IRS Scrutiny and Compliance: The IRS meticulously reviews nonprofit tax returns to ensure alignment with the organization's stated mission when obtaining 501(c) status. Excessive spending on key employees and operational costs, rather than on mission-related activities, could lead to the revocation of tax-exempt status. Board members must avoid personal financial gains and adhere to conflict-of-interest statements to maintain the organization's integrity.
Public Scrutiny and Accountability: Beyond IRS oversight, watchdog groups play a crucial role in holding nonprofits accountable. Websites like Guidestar and the Foundation Center provide access to nonprofits' tax returns, enabling transparency. Organizations like CharityNavigator and CharityWatch rank nonprofits based on the percentage of funds allocated to mission work versus administration, offering a public metric for assessing an organization's efficiency and commitment to its mission.
In conclusion, the landscape of nonprofit management is intricate and multifaceted, with regulatory bodies and public scrutiny ensuring accountability and transparency in the pursuit of charitable objectives.
