DevonK
Well-Known Member
Wow - better than anticipated, the performance is only 30 lbs more than the equivalent sport touring (mt). And the new engine hasn't increased the front end weight that much, 60 lb.
Captain Drew
Well-Known Member
So about what we have been speculating. Neat.
shane_mumford
New Member
- First Name
- Lachlan
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2022
- Threads
- 0
- Messages
- 3
- Reaction score
- 1
- Location
- 2444, PORT MACQUARIE
- Car(s)
- ford falcon xr6 (bf)
- Occupation
- school
mpg is 
?
2017370ZBlack
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Steve
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2021
- Threads
- 4
- Messages
- 189
- Reaction score
- 412
- Location
- Wesley Chapel, FL
- Car(s)
- 2017 370Z 6MT & 2015 Xterra Pro-4X
mpg is
?
Just wait until you're flooring it all the time.
bybepl
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Paul
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2022
- Threads
- 13
- Messages
- 156
- Reaction score
- 305
- Location
- Grand Rapids, MI
- Car(s)
- Cayman S
- Occupation
- IT
In MT 56% front, 44% rear
2017370ZBlack
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Steve
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2021
- Threads
- 4
- Messages
- 189
- Reaction score
- 412
- Location
- Wesley Chapel, FL
- Car(s)
- 2017 370Z 6MT & 2015 Xterra Pro-4X
mpg is
Z's also require premium gas. This is not an economy car!
94boosted
Well-Known Member
Ugh, why is it over 200lbs heavier than the Supra 3.0? Come on Nissan 
2023 Performance AT - 3602lbs
2022 Supra 3.0 - 3400lbs
Comparing apples to apples, I assume when the '23 Supra 3.0 MT comes out it will be lighter than the AT.
bybepl
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Paul
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2022
- Threads
- 13
- Messages
- 156
- Reaction score
- 305
- Location
- Grand Rapids, MI
- Car(s)
- Cayman S
- Occupation
- IT
with the way i drive, i will probably end up with 8mpg
Agreed fuel mileage is least of my concerns. Tank size will be interesting though, not sure we know that or have seen that.
DevonK
Well-Known Member
So Jalopnik is putting the most negative click-grabbing spin it could come up with on the weight - the Z "weighs almost 200 pounds heavier than the 370Z". They made the rather stupid mistake of comparing the weight of a Performance MT to the 370Z Sport MT rather than the Sport Touring which would be the more appropriate match.
Andaesthetics
Well-Known Member
Agreed fuel mileage is least of my concerns. Tank size will be interesting though, not sure we know that or have seen that.
Will probably be the same as the 370Z: 19 gal.
300ZTT
Member
Glad to see the extra hundred lbs was at least put on 50/50. Was expecting it all to be up front.
Hmm, kinda looks like the majority was put on front. I'm not liking that weight distribution, ugh!
Nissan Z Sport (MT)
Front weight: 1991
Rear weight: 1495
Weight Bias: 57.1% Front/42.9% Rear
Nissan Z Sport (AT)
Front weight: 2041
Rear weight: 1508
Weight Bias: 57.5% Front/42.5% Rear
Nissan Z Performance (MT)
Front weight: 1995
Rear weight: 1541
Weight Bias: 56.4% Front/43.6% Rear
Nissan Z Performance (AT)
Front weight: 2041
Rear weight: 1561
Weight Bias: 56.7% Front/43.3% Rear
Nissan 370Z Trim? (AT/MT?)
Front weight: 1835
Rear weight: 1521
Weight Bias: 54.7% Front/45.3% Rear
