Cities
Volume 97,
February 2020
, 102518
Author links open overlay panel, ,
Abstract
China is a country of homeowners, where >80% of households own their homes and >20% of urban households own multiple homes. China achieved this unprecedented high rate home ownership in a short period of three decades. While we have a growing understanding of homeownership in general we are less clear about the process and outcomes of multiple home ownership in China. This paper examines the patterns of and driving forces for multiple home ownership, and explores the implications for housing inequality in Chinese cities. While socio-economic factors appear critical in China as is the case in the West, we argue for an institutional and cultural perspective to better understand multiple home ownership in China. The empirical analyses using 2015 China Household Finance Survey show that households who received housing subsidies, have urban registration, experienced demolition and resettlement, have school age children attending key schools, and have sons are more likely to own multiple homes. By focusing on the institutional and cultural forces, this paper better explains the unprecedented high rate of multiple homeownership in Chinese cities, and demonstrates how various housing policies in China have unintentionally contributed to multiple homeownership and thus housing and wealth inequality.
Introduction
China is a country of homeowners, where >80% all households own their homes (well above the rates for what have been defined as ownership socities in the West) (Clark, Huang, & Yi, 2019). If homeownership is an important indicator for the Chinese Dream, as it was for the American Dream, it is fair to say that most Chinese have achieved their Chinese Dream. This is a spectacular achievement especially given the fact that public rental was the dominant tenure in the 1980s in Chinese cities, and homeownership has recently declined in Western countries. Along with the growth of ownership there has been an expansion of multiple home ownership. More than 20% of urban households (16% of rural households) own multiple homes, which is also much higher than many developed nations (e.g. 3%–4% in Australia and Northern Ireland; 13% in the U.S. and about 10% in Britain (Resolution Foundation, August 2017; Paris, 2010; Choi, Hong, & Scheinkman, 2014). Residential property has made up >60% of household assets in China since 2008, while the same proportion is about 30% in U.S. (NAHB, 2013; Huang, 2013; Xie & Jin, 2015). There is a long history of the rich and powerful in China owning multiple homes (Feng & Liu, 2000), but the middle class ownership of multiple homes is a relatively new phenomenon (Huang, 2004). Clearly, there is a conundrum where there is overbuilding and “ghost towns” on the one hand, and where millions of migrants and urban poor lack basic housing on the other hand. A better understanding of multiple home ownership and its implications for housing inequality in Chinese cities is central to understanding the Chinese housing market and Chinese society. This paper focuses on the recent patterns and processes of multiple home ownership in Chinese cities.
Our focus on multiple ownership is set within the significant changes in the Chinese housing market in the past two decades. Since 2003, the housing system in Chinese cities has experienced increased marketization, rapidly increasing housing prices, and growing housing inequality. Official statistics show that housing prices more than doubled during 2007–2014 (Chivakul, Lam, Liu, Maliszewski, & Schipke, 2015) and these statistics may in fact underestimate the actual housing price growth.1 Housing prices in top Chinese cities are similar to those in major American cities. For example, the average price per square foot is $550 in Beijing and Shanghai and $770 in Shenzhen, compared to $600 in Boston and $1000 in San Francisco (Glaeser, Huang, Ma, & Shleifer, 2017). However, per capita income in Beijing, Shanghai and Shenzhen is only $7500, compared to more than $50,000 in San Francisco and $40,000 in Boston. The estimated price-income ratio (PRI) in Beijing ranged from below 10 (Lu, Zhen, & Xu, 2012) to above 18 in 2010 (Wu, Gyourko, & Deng, 2012) and above 25 in 2016 (Glaeser et al., 2017), making Beijing one of the most expensive cities in the world. The picture is similar in Shanghai, Shenzhen, and other large Chinese cities.
As a result, housing affordability is a critical issue among not only the poor but also the emerging middle class. Consequently, the government developed an ambitious affordable housing program in 2010, building 5.8 million units in 2010 and another 36 million units of affordable housing during 2011–2015 (Huang, 2012). Meanwhile, to discourage housing speculation, the government issued several rounds of regulations over the years, two in 2010 alone. On April 17 of 2010, State Council (2010) issued the landmark “New Ten Articles”, which outlined ten measures to control the rapid increase in housing prices. One of the measures is to tighten mortgage access especially for multiple home ownership. For second homes, the minimum down payment ratio was raised to 50% and the mortgage interest rate was raised to at least 1.10 times of the basic interest rate; and for the third homes, mortgage was even harder to access if not impossible. In addition, the central government for the first time required local governments to impose direct restrictions on home purchases in large and medium cities. Despite regional variations, this policy limits households with local registration (hukou) to own up to two housing units and migrants without local hukou who have been working and paying taxes in cities for more than one year to own only one unit. This home purchase restriction was considered by some as the harshest housing market regulation, and larger cities are urged by the State Council to implement even more strict home purchase restriction measures (Sun, Zheng, Geltner, & Wang, 2017; Jia, Wang, & Fan, 2018). Despite strict restrictions on mortgage access and housing purchase by the government, relatively low household income and high housing price, multiple home ownership in China continues to rise steadily. The question is why.
Given this new and complex housing context and the government's concern with multiple ownership, this paper addresses two questions: 1) what are the patterns of multiple home ownership in Chinese cities? 2) What are the driving forces for multiple home ownership in China? And how is it different from the West? The paper is organized as following: In Section 2, the paper defines multiple home ownership, reviews the literature, lays out a conceptual framework for understanding multiple home ownership in China, and sets out specific hypotheses. In Section 3, an empirical study is conducted to test hypotheses, followed by a discussion and conclusion in Section 4.
Section snippets
Definition of multiple home ownership
Defining “multiple homes” or “second homes” can be difficult because of their dynamic relationship with the primary residence. Western definitions focus on how the second home is used, usually for leisure purposes but also rented out on short term leases. There are often institutional bases for distinctions between “primary” and “second” homes, including the number of days of rental income required before tax is chargeable on such an income, and tax advantages on mortgage interests (Paris, 2006
Data and methods
This study utilizes the 2015 China Household Finance Survey (CHFS), which is a nationally representative, household-level survey conducted by the China Household Finance Survey and Research Center at Southwestern University of Finance and Economics in Chengdu, China. The CHFS employed three-stage probability proportional to size (PPS) sampling method to ensure it is nationally representative. By mapping all apartments and houses in the sampled communities, the survey built its own final
Descriptive analysis
First of all, multiple home owners have different profiles from traditional homeowners who own only one home (Table 3). Multiple home owners tend to be younger, more educated, much more likely to be in the public sector and have formal employment than those own only one home. The former are more likely to have young children (<15) attending key schools, more likely to have sons, and more likely to live with parents. Compared to traditional homeowners, they are also financially better, with much
Conclusions and discussion
Chinese have always had a love affair with property, and historically the rich have always had multiple homes. However, the recent surge in multiple home ownership among the population as a whole is a new phenomenon that bears both similarities to and major differences from multiple home ownership in the West. Just like those in the West, the emerging middle class in China is purchasing additional homes to facilitate their recreation/leisure consumption, meet the needs of rising mobility and
Acknowledgement
This research is in part funded by the 111 Project B16040, Ministry of Education, China.
References (70)
- Y. Chen et al.
Access to public schools and the education of migrant children in China
China Economic Review
(2013)
- H.S. Choi et al.
Speculating on home improvements
Journal of Financial Economics
(2014)
- L. Fang et al.
Housing and marital matching: A signaling perspective
China Economic Review
(2018)
- E.C.M. Hui et al.
Second homes in the Chinese Mainland under “one country, two systems”: A cross-border perspective
Habitat International
(2009)
- S.-J. Wei et al.
Home ownership as status competition: Some theory and evidence
Journal of Development Economics
(2017)
- D.H. Wrenn et al.
House prices and marriage entry in China
Regional Science and Urban Economics
(2019)
- J. Wu et al.
Evaluating conditions in major Chinese housing markets
Regional Science and Urban Economics
(2012)
- Beijing Housing and Urban-Rural Development Committee (BHURDC)
A notification about income, housing and wealth standard for accessing cheap rental housing and economic housing in Beijing
(2007)
- Beijing Housing and Urban-Rural Development Committee (BHURDC)
Suggestions on implementing no. 4 document by state Council regarding how to promote stable and healthy development of the real estate market (no. 72)
(2010)
- Beijing Municipal Government (BMG)
No. 8. A notice on Beijing municipal government about implementing state council regulation and further strengthen local real estate market regulation (Beijing shi renmin zhengfu bangongting guanyu Guanche luoshi guowuyuan baigongting wenjie jingsheng jinyibu jiaqiang benshi fangdichan shichan tiaokong gongzuo de tongzhi)
The great second home swindle, roof, May/June
(2006)
A notice about strengthening mortgage management for commercial real estate
(2007)
Multiple housing ownership and household portfolio choice in urban China
Journal of Housing and Built Environment
(2019)
Understanding residential real estate in China
(2015)
Can millennials access homeownership in urban China?
Journal of Housing and the Built Environment
(2019)
Housing market sentiment and homeownership
Journal of Housing and Built Environment
(2019)
State capacity and local agent control in China: CCP cadre management from a township perspective
The China Quarterly
(2003)
On the development of China's second residence—Dynamic mechanism, characteristics, effect, and prospect for planning (zhongguo dier zhuzhai fazhuan de yanjiu – Dongle ji*zhi, tezheng, xiaoying yu guihua zhanwang)
Intra-urban migration and correlative spatial behavior in Beijing in the process of suburbanization: Based on 1000 questionnaires (jiaoquhua jincheng zhong Beijing chengshi neibu qianju ji xiangguan kongjian xingwei – jiyu qianfeng wenjuan diaocha de fenxi)
Geographical Research
(2004)
The second home boom
(2003)
Second homes: European perspectives and UK policies
(2017)
A real estate boom with Chinese characteristics
Journal of Economic Perspectives
(2017)
The great urban transformation: Politics of land and property in China
(2010)
The road to homeownership: A longitudinal analysis of tenure transition in urban China (1949–1994)
International Journal of Urban and Regional Research
(2004)
Low-income housing in Chinese cities: Policies and practices
The China Quarterly
(2012)
The role of people’s expectation in the recent US housing boom and bust
The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics
(2013)
Housing tenure choice in transitional urban China: A multilevel analysis
Urban Studies
(2002)
Housing migrants in Chinese cities: Current status and policy design
Environment and Planning. C, Government & Policy
(2015)
Consumption and tenure choice of multiple homes in transitional urban China
International Journal of Housing Policy
(2010)
Second home ownership in transitional urban China
Housing Studies
(2011)
Patterns of second home ownership in Chinese cities
Home-purchase limits and housing prices: Evidence from China
The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics
(2018)
Nature of place attachment: A study among recreation homeowners in southern Norway
Leisure Sciences
(1997)
Cited by (38)
Household indebtedness, financial frictions and the transmission of monetary policy to consumption: Evidence from China
2023, Emerging Markets Review
This paper studies the impact of household indebtedness on the transmission of monetary policy to consumption using the Chinese household-level survey data. We employ a panel smooth transition regression model to investigate the non-linear role of indebtedness. We find that housing-related indebtedness weakens the monetary policy transmission, and this effect is non-linear as there is a much larger counteraction of consumption in response to monetary policy shocks when household indebtedness increases from a low level rather than from a high level. Moreover, the weakened monetary policy transmission from indebtedness is stronger in urban households than in rural households. This can be explained by the investment good characteristic of real estate in China.
His house, her house? Gender inequality and homeownership among married couples in urban China
2023, Cities
Nearly four decades of housing reforms have transformed China into a homeowner society with homeownership rates exceeding 90% in 2019. However, exactly which household member owns the property has seldom been studied. Using the 2017 China Household Financial Survey, this study examines the distribution of homeownership between the husband and wife, which is of great importance for understanding gender dynamics and intra-household inequality in urban China. Employing multi-level multinomial regressions, the results show that husbands generally have an absolute advantage of being the owners, which is stronger among the younger cohort. However, a wife's higher socioeconomic status, indicated by education, occupation, Chinese Communist Party membership, or hukou status, significantly increases her propensity to be stated as the deed owner. Furthermore, the gender disparity in homeownership between the husband and wife narrows in developed cities. We argue that the overall male dominance in household homeownership is structured and strengthened by the promotion of homeownership as a social norm, trapping both men and women in the reproduction of gender inequality.
Homeownership for Whom? Going beyond the illusion of the conventional measurement
2022, Habitat International
Citation Excerpt :
The use of an investor indicator is more important today than ever because of the increase in the investors’ share in many countries. In China, for example, ∼20% of households own multiple homes, 13% in the US, 10% in the UK, and 3% in Australia (Huang et al., 2020). The current study went one step further and proposed an aggregate method based on cross-variable data to examine the effect of homeownership on socioeconomic disparities.
China's new age floating population: Talent workers and drifting elders
2022, Cities
Talent workers are becoming a critical factor in the urbanization of China. Government programs encourage the attraction of these skilled and university educated workers by providing subsidized housing. Talent workers are responding to these incentives, yet many are not settling in the urban communities that woo them. This micro-scale case study of talent worker housing in Shenzhen explores some aspects of the lived experience of these “floating” talent workers. As a well-paid and upwardly mobile component of the floating population, talent workers are typically co-resident with their spouses and dependent children. However, a third generation is commonly present in these urban extended family households. Parents and in-laws of talent workers provide grandchild care and as such, they exemplify the “drifting elderly,” a newly identified phenomenon in China's cities. Interview evidence shows that about one half of young talent workers and virtually all of the drifting elderly constitute a new age floating population, challenging traditional conceptions of the floating population as an urban underclass. Despite the provision of subsidized housing intended to foster the retention of talent workers in Shenzhen, many are not committed to staying in their community and have no interest in attaining local urban hukou status.
Housing wealth effect and tenure choice: An endogenous switching regression analysis
2022, Habitat International
Citation Excerpt :
This phenomenon raised a question: Why are China's situations quite different? Research in Chinese studies has made an attempt to explain this phenomena from various aspects, such as marriage markets competition, traditional customs and consumption view (Wei & Zhang, 2011; Lin, Rahman, & Yung, 2009; Deng et al., 2020; Huang, Yi, & Clark, 2020). However, the majorities related to this issue ignores the truth that the development of Chinese real estate market differs from the westerns'.
Market sentiment has been playing a important role in Chinese housing market in last two decades, while has not received enough attentions in literature. With this in mind, this paper first establishes sentiment index depicting housing market sentiment in China. Then, the paper uses an endogenous switching regression model to investigate how housing price affects joint determination of housing choice and non-housing expenditure, with regard to the moderating role of market sentiment. This paper finds that the rising housing prices is negatively related to the probability of being an owner and positively associated with consumption. However, the counter-factual analysis the choice of being a owner has a negative effect on consumption over all and such an effect can be weakened by having a mortgage. A higher sentiment can improve the likelihood of home ownership and reduces non-housing consumption. This study helps households to optimize the wealth allocation and governments in their housing policy strategies and developers in their property development.
Estimating housing vacancy rates at block level: The example of Guiyang, China
2022, Landscape and Urban Planning
For the real estate market, housing prices as well as housing vacancy rates (HVRs) are key indicators. However, for the latter indicator, there is no official data set for Chinese cities. Collecting HVR in a traditional way requires enormous personnel efforts and is therefore very expensive and time consuming. In this study, we introduce a framework for estimating the HVR at high spatial resolution (i.e. at block level) for residential areas based on several emerging data sources. The developed framework consists of three steps: 1) we extract residential blocks and map detailed housing data. These data are applied to estimate the population capacity; 2) we spatially distribute the actual census population into residential blocks as a function of night light emission intensity; 3) we estimate the HVR for each residential block according to the gap between its actual distributed population and the estimated population capacity. We find the following main results for our test case of Guiyang in China: 1) the average HVR in the urban area of Guiyang is estimated at 25%; 2) with rising distance to the city center the HVR is increasing; 3) the buildings that have been built more recently feature higher HVRs. We check the plausibility of our approach using water consumption data as proxy information for residency. These checks reveal high accuracies. With this suggested workflow relying on open data sources and the achieved plausibility, the developed framework for HVR estimation has the potential to be applied on a large scale.
Recommended articles (6)
Research article
Unpacking the paradox of “insecure” housing rights in China: Urban residents’ perceptions on institutional credibility
Cities, Volume 97, 2020, Article 102485
Formal or de jure property rights are deemed conditional for development in a neo-liberal reading. Paradoxically, real estate underwent explosive development even though China’s rights for housing are informal, ambiguous, and insecure. This article intends to explain this contradiction by examining how Chinese urban residents perceive the credibility of housing rights from three perspectives, i.e., ownership, land lease, and the 70-year lease term. The study is based on a survey (n=1207) demonstrating: i) half of the respondents are indifferent about formalization policies; ii) 92 percent have never experienced housing-related conflicts, however, of those reporting conflict, close to half indicated demolition as the source; iii) housing ownership is considered important for most while the land use (or lease) permit is considerably less relevant, and the lease term is considered insignificant. Three conclusions can be drawn. First, urban residents have no preference for a “full bundle” of formal rights. Second, although low conflict indicates credibility of the current rights structure, there are risks to social stability due to expropriation. Three, credibility hinges on combinations of (in)formality and (in)security rather than being a direct function of formalization. Findings emphasize a need to rethink the property rights theory in terms of credibility, conflict, and time.
Research article
Does happiness dwell in an owner-occupied house? Homeownership and subjective well-being in urban China
Cities, Volume 96, 2020, Article 102404
This study investigates the causal relationship between homeownership and subjective well-being based on household-level panel data collected from the China Household Finance Survey (CHFS) in 2011 and 2013. The extent to which homeownership contributes to the changes in subjective well-being is estimated, focusing on the heterogeneous effects across socioeconomic and demographic groups. Evidence from the identification strategies indicates that homeownership has a positive impact on subjective well-being. Moreover, the results are robust to different specifications and unaffected by the financial constraints faced by new homeowners. Our findings have useful implications for policymakers to stimulate homeownership rates to promote subjective well-being.
Research article
Effect of hometown housing investment on the homeownership of rural migrants in urban destinations: Evidence from China
Cities, Volume 105, 2020, Article 102619
The relationship between transnational housing investment and homeownership status in destinations has received considerable attention. However, the direct causal link between both activities remains scant. This study introduces a new conceptual and empirical framework, quasi-transnationalism and integration nexus, to discuss the causal effects of hometown housing investment on the homeownership of rural migrants in urban destinations. The research also applies a national representative data in China, the National Migrants Population Dynamic Monitoring Survey (NMPDMS), to explore such causal effect. The results show that hometown housing investment has a significantly negative effect on homeownership in urban destinations, whereas the substitution effect of hometown housing investment exceeds the complementary. The conclusions are consistent when IV-LPM regression is applied to correct the potential endogeneity of migrants' hometown housing investment. There are some notable differentials across life cycle groups and origin-destination groups, those are, hometown housing investment produces a larger negative effect for the old generation than the new generation, while it also plays a more important role for migrants who moved within the same regions, but the effect on the migrants from Central and Western China to East China is the weakest among the four origin-destination groups. The possible mechanism is that hometown housing investment influences the housing tenure choice through affecting the return migration plan and housing purchase intent in urban destinations.
Research article
Assessment of barriers to public rental housing exits: Evidence from tenants in Beijing, China
Cities, Volume 87, 2019, pp. 153-165
Public rental housing (PRH) exits exert a profound influence on turnover rates, which further impact the public housing principles of fairness and efficiency. However, very few studies have attempted to investigate the tenant's barriers to exit PRH units in Chinese studies. In this paper, using data drawn from a randomly sampled survey of tenants in Beijing during the March 2017, we employ structural equation modeling (SEM) to examine the factors influencing tenant's barriers to exit. We find that housing availability is the most influential factor in determining the tenant's barriers to leave PRH, and residential satisfaction is also considered as a motivation against PRH exits. In addition, residential satisfaction transfers the impact of tenant's perceptions of housing and neighborhood to exit barriers. Especially, the effects of housing availability on exit barriers are higher in some groups, such as elderly, high income households, large-sized families and respondents with long spell of residence. Any program aimed at getting tenants to leave public housing sector needs to reduce their barriers to access to the private rental market and take into consideration the various characteristics of the tenants.
Research article
Housing prices, rural–urban migrants' settlement decisions and their regional differences in China
Habitat International, Volume 50, 2015, pp. 149-159
Rural–urban migrants are the major group who will boost the transformation of China's urbanization and reform of the household registration system. Their aspirations of living in the immigration area are an important premise of institutional change. The housing prices within the immigration areas are an important factor that can influence the rural–urban migrants' settlement decision. To what degree does the housing price influence the settlement decision? Do regional differences exist in the influence of house price? These issues need to be analyzed and verified in a theoretical and empirical ways. By introducing the variables of the housing price into the life-cycle theory function, we found that housing price influences the settlement decision through the welfare dissipation effect and the expected wealth effect. On the basis of welfare dissipation effect, hypothesis 1, we can come to the conclusion that high housing price will play a negative role in the process of settlement decision formation. Through expected wealth effect, hypothesis 2, we estimate that a housing price rise will promote the aspiration of living in the immigration area to some extent inversely. On this hypothesis basis, using the panel data model of China's 31 provinces and cities for the period 1995–2012, we found that, at the national level, the influence of housing price to the settlement decision is not significant. From the view of regional differences, the influence is negative in the eastern area, indicating that the welfare dissipation effect is greater than the expected wealth effect, in line with the hypothesis 1. The increase of housing prices will promote the settlement decision in the central area, this phenomena explains that the expected wealth effect is greater than the welfare dissipation effect, in line with the hypothesis 2. In the western area, the influence is non-significant.
Research article
Housing investment in urban China
Journal of Comparative Economics, Volume 46, Issue 1, 2018, pp. 212-247
What explains the rapidly increasing housing investment demand in China? To address this question, we develop an analytical framework featuring how expected capital gains impact households' housing investment decisions when subject to financial constraints. Housing demand in China takes place not only through households' owning multiple houses, but also through their owning a larger primary living residence if they are constrained from buying multiple houses. We show that households are more likely to own multiple houses when expecting higher capital gains. As expected capital gain increases, the primary housing demand of those households who are constrained from owning multiple houses increases, while those owing multiple housing units invest in extra ones instead of improving primary housing. Our empirical findings, based on 2010 and 2011 household survey data, are consistent with our theoretical predictions. We also find that the marginal effect of expected capital gains is higher for wealthier households. This links the booming housing market to widening income inequality which is a typical growth pain in a developing country like China. As an extension, we apply the analysis to derive implications of the institutional features (such as purchasing restriction policy and the existence of subsidized housing) for China’s housing markets.
© 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.