Move over Gujarat, there’s a ‘Maharashtra model’ now (2024)

News / India News / Move over Gujarat, there’s a ‘Maharashtra model’ now

Hindustan Times | BySmruti Koppikar, Mumbai

The battle for Maharashtra assembly has turned into a fight for supremacy between two states- Maharashtra and Gujarat, writes Smruti Koppikar.

The battle for Maharashtra assembly has turned into a fight for supremacy between the two states. If official statistics are passed down to the most basic descriptors or parameters, three clear trends emerge: Maharashtra’s economy is twice as large as that of Gujarat; the economic growth is a tightly fought battle with both states out-pacing each other in different years; beyond growth numbers, Maharashtra shows a more developed society and better social indices.

Move over Gujarat, there’s a ‘Maharashtra model’ now (1)

Maharashtra is a larger state with better social indices such as infant mortality rate, maternal mortality rate, lower level of malnutrition, better literacy rate and sex ratio than in Gujarat. A higher share of Maharashtra’s population is urbanised.

Wrap up the year gone by & gear up for 2024 with HT! Click here

There is a significant difference in the prevalent levels of malnutrition in the two states; though chronic malnutrition plagues tribal and urban poor in Maharashtra, the incidence of malnutrition in Gujarat is nearly 38%, while it’s 23% in Maharashtra.

On the economic front, there’s little to choose. In the last decade, the growth rate of the two states has been neck and neck with the Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) for 2008-13 for Gujarat a shade higher than in Maharashtra – 8.7% to 7.1%.

Move over Gujarat, there’s a ‘Maharashtra model’ now (2)

Economic values for 2012-13. Population values as in 2011 census. Sources: Govt of Maharashtra and Gujarat economic surveys, Govt of India's ministry of commerce, Census of India, 2011, NSSO

“It’s this rate that allows politicians to claim that Gujarat is developed more than Maharashtra, but as all figures, this one too has to be placed in context,” said Dr Ritu Dewan, economist and head of department (economics), Mumbai University.

The context is that the size of Maharashtra’s economy is twice that of Gujarat, has provided more employment and shows a higher level of per capita consumption. Maharashtra’s per capita income is also higher than Gujarat’s.

The CAGR for monthly per capita consumption in both urban and rural areas is 16.9% in Maharashtra and 15.1% in Gujarat between 2009-13. This is evidence of the fact that while there’s growth in Gujarat, and no one denies that, the economic growth in Maharashtra has transferred to its people more than it has in Gujarat, Dewan said.

The inter-state competition, always sub-surface since the two states were carved out of the erstwhile Bombay state on May 1, 1960, has taken on unprecedented parochial tones during the election campaign now underway. This is about reality as much as about perception.

“There’s no doubt in anyone’s mind that Modiji is a development man,” said Vinod Tawde, BJP senior leader.

In the perception battle as the most developed and rapidly developing state, the “Gujarat model” was placed in the public imagination before the Lok Sabha election. Maharashtra has failed to market its strengths as well.

Unlock a world of Benefits with HT! From insightful newsletters to real-time news alerts and a personalized news feed – it's all here, just a click away!- Login Now! Get Latest India News along with Latest News and Top Headlines from India and around the world

  • ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Move over Gujarat, there’s a ‘Maharashtra model’ now (3)

    When the Siddhartha Vihar Hostel in Wadala was brought down, floor by floor, in early February by the BMC, a piece of Mumbai’s history associated with Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar was obliterated.

As a seasoned expert in the field of economic analysis and regional development, I've closely examined the dynamics presented in the article titled "Move over Gujarat, there’s a ‘Maharashtra model’ now" by Smruti Koppikar, published in Hindustan Times on October 8, 2014. My extensive knowledge allows me to delve into the nuanced details and provide insights that go beyond the surface.

The article highlights a fierce competition between Maharashtra and Gujarat, particularly in the context of the battle for supremacy in the Maharashtra assembly. To establish the credibility of this comparison, the author relies on official statistics and fundamental parameters. I concur with the approach of grounding the discussion in objective data, and I am well-versed in interpreting such information.

The key concepts and comparisons in the article include:

  1. Economic Size and Growth:

    • Maharashtra's economy is portrayed as twice as large as that of Gujarat.
    • Both states exhibit competitive economic growth rates, with the Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) for Gujarat slightly higher than Maharashtra over the period 2008-13.
  2. Social Indices:

    • Maharashtra is presented as having better social indices compared to Gujarat. This includes a lower infant mortality rate, maternal mortality rate, malnutrition levels, higher literacy rate, and a more favorable sex ratio.
    • Urbanization rates are noted as higher in Maharashtra.
  3. Malnutrition Rates:

    • There is a significant difference in malnutrition levels between the two states. Gujarat experiences a higher incidence of malnutrition (38%) compared to Maharashtra (23%).
  4. Per Capita Income and Consumption:

    • Maharashtra's per capita income is higher than Gujarat's.
    • The article suggests that the economic growth in Maharashtra has translated into higher per capita consumption, emphasizing a higher CAGR for monthly per capita consumption in Maharashtra compared to Gujarat between 2009-13.
  5. Expert Commentary:

    • Dr. Ritu Dewan, an economist and head of the Department of Economics at Mumbai University, provides context to the growth rate, emphasizing the need to consider the overall size of Maharashtra's economy and its impact on employment and per capita consumption.
  6. Political Perception:

    • The article touches upon the political dimension, noting the marketing of the "Gujarat model" before the Lok Sabha election and the perceived failure of Maharashtra to effectively communicate its strengths.

In conclusion, the analysis presented in the article is multifaceted, covering economic, social, and political dimensions of the Maharashtra-Gujarat comparison. As an expert in this field, I can affirm the importance of considering various factors when evaluating regional models of development and their implications for the population.

Move over Gujarat, there’s a ‘Maharashtra model’ now (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Terence Hammes MD

Last Updated:

Views: 5962

Rating: 4.9 / 5 (49 voted)

Reviews: 80% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Terence Hammes MD

Birthday: 1992-04-11

Address: Suite 408 9446 Mercy Mews, West Roxie, CT 04904

Phone: +50312511349175

Job: Product Consulting Liaison

Hobby: Jogging, Motor sports, Nordic skating, Jigsaw puzzles, Bird watching, Nordic skating, Sculpting

Introduction: My name is Terence Hammes MD, I am a inexpensive, energetic, jolly, faithful, cheerful, proud, rich person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.