Kiss on billions on EURUSD V.191.113 - TESTING ON A REAL TICK STORY MT5! (2024)

Statistics

10 January 2020, 12:00

Aleh Sasonka

1 812

1. Testing on a real tick story - EURUSD,m1 for the year 2018.

Server: MetaQuotes-Demo - Demo Account - Hedge

Testing with standard parameters on EURUSD,m1 (2018.01.01-2019.01.01):

2. Testing on a real tick story - EURUSD,m1 for the year 2019.

Server:MetaQuotes-Demo - Demo Account - Hedge

Testing with standard parameters on EURUSD,m1 (2019.01.01-2020.01.01):

3. Testing on a real tick story - GBPUSD,m1 for the year 2019.

Server:MetaQuotes-Demo - Demo Account - Hedge

Testing with standard parameters on GBPUSD,m1 (2019.01.01-2020.01.01):

4. Testing on a real tick story - USDCHF,m1 for the year 2019.

Server:MetaQuotes-Demo - Demo Account - Hedge

Testing with standard parameters on USDCHF,m1 (2019.01.01-2020.01.01):

Choose a broker and trading conditions with the minimum spread and use rebate (a refund of the spread).

Check out the spread repayment terms - onthis page.

Compare brokers in terms of repayment spread - see onthis page.

Note: All tests used the settings recommended by the author.

Note: the results of trading on real account may differ significantly from the results of testing due to slippage and requotes.

Since good test results were obtained only for one instrument, it can be concluded that an expert author of optimized parameters for the history (of the same instrument EURUSD). This may indicate that in the future we will not get such beautiful results.

#EA, MT4, robot, Testing, real, tick story

Source

Share it with friends:

Aleh Sasonka 2020.03.18 10:01 #1

Спустя четыре месяца после обновления советника мы можем проверить его эффективность на сегодняшний момент. Для этого мы воспользуемся функцией тестирования МТ5 на двух равных участках - четыре месяца до оновления и четыре месяца после, и сравним результаты.

--------------------------

Four months after the upgrade advisor, we can check its performance to date. For this we use MT5 test function in two equal portions - four months to do updates and four months after, and compare the results.

Данные тестирования показывают сохранение положительного результата, хотя и не столь оптимистичного (750% до обновления и 230% после).

----------------------------

These tests show the preservation of a positive result, although not as optimistic (750% to 230% renovation and after).

Sadasoft 2020.04.19 13:32 #2

Dear Aleh :

And what if the results we are seeing in the backtest had been FAKENED by hardwiring the info related to which year we are testing ?

That will be a REAL problem ? does not it ? ( this is hipotetical sure....)

Regards

Harry Sadasoft

PS So..the very first thing to do for ANY serious testing is to be SURE that what we are testing is not misleading or "contaminating" the test.I invite the community to give some ideas about this topic.
I have my own one...but I would like to hear about others ideas

Aleh Sasonka 2020.04.20 12:35 #3

Sadasoft:

And what if the results we are seeing in the backtest had been FAKENED by hardwiring the info related to which year we are testing ?

That will be a REAL problem ? does not it ? ( this is hipotetical sure....)

Приветствую. Я применил стандартную схему проверки на форвард периоде. При этом тестировании период делится на две части. Я выбрал равные части, что бы результат был наиболее наглядный. Естественно, что при сравнении тестов на разных периодах, мы имеем разные результаты. Но по статистике при увеличении размера периода, результаты тестов должны быть всё более похожи.

-------------------------------------------

Greetings. I applied the standard authentication scheme on the forward period. In this case, the test period is divided into two parts. I chose equal parts, whatever the result was the most obvious. Of course, when comparing the test at different periods, we have different results. But according to statistics by increasing the size of the period, the test results have to be more and more similar.

Aleh Sasonka 2020.04.23 08:59 #4

Спустя пять месяцев после обновления советника мы ещё раз проверим его эффективность. Для этого мы воспользуемся функцией тестирования МТ5 на двух равных участках - пять месяцев до оновления и пять месяцев после, и сравним результаты.

--------------------------

Five months later, after the upgrade advisor, we again test its effectiveness. For this we use MT5 test function in two equal portions - five months to do updates, and five months later, and compare the results.

Данные тестирования показывают сохранение положительного результата (3300% до обновления и 615% после).

----------------------------

Test data show that a positive result (3300% and 615% renovation and after).

To add comments, please log in or register