You deposit your paycheck with your bank because it’s safer there than under your mattress. And that’s true under normal circ*mstances. But what happens when recession looms and depositors get anxious?
When too many people try to withdraw money from the same bank within a short period of time, a bank run ensues. Back in the day, when gold-backed banknotes were the coin of the realm, bank runs would literally drain banks’ cash reserves and force them out of business. Today, bank runs are more likely to be “silent” — marked by numerous electronic funds transfers into other accounts. They can still spell doom for affected banks though.
The good news is that if you bank with a financial institution insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, you’re unlikely to lose money in a bank run, even if you don’t get your funds out in time. In fact, your money is safer in the bank during a recession than as cash stored in your home, where it’s vulnerable to theft, fire, and other perils.
Is Your Money Safe in a Bank During a Recession?
In short, yes, your money is safe in a bank during a recession. As long as the bank is FDIC-insured.
To find out if your bank has FDIC insurance, look for “Member FDIC” language on the bank’s website or in its marketing materials. Many banks even work small “Member FDIC” icons into their logos.
They want you to know they’re fully insured by the U.S. government.
FDIC insurance supports the widely held view that bank balances are low-risk investments — albeit low-return as well. However, it has some limits.
Financial Products Covered by FDIC Insurance
FDIC insurance only covers certain financial products backed by member banks:
- Checking accounts
- Savings accounts — we’re big fans of CIT Bank’s Savings Connect account, which has a category-leading yield: 4.65% APY
- Money market accounts
- Certificates of deposit (CDs)
- Prepaid cards that meet certain FDIC requirements
The good news is that this list is pretty broad, covering all the common account types offered by U.S.-based banks. But if you’re not sure whether your account type is covered by FDIC insurance, check the FDIC’s full list of covered financial products.
Insurance Limit Per Ownership Category
The FDIC’s insurance coverage is not unlimited. Even the federal government has to watch its bottom line.
Again, there’s good news here. The FDIC’s standard coverage limit is $250,000 per institution, per ownership category — a healthy chunk of change.
“Ownership category” refers to how you hold your funds. Ownership category examples include:
- Single or individual ownership — that is, you’re the only name on the account
- Joint ownership, a common arrangement between spouses and domestic partners
- Business accounts held in the name of a business entity
- Revocable or irrevocable trust accounts — the $250,000 insurance limit applies per beneficiary, so a trust with three beneficiaries can be insured up to $750,000
- Individual retirement accounts (IRAs)
- Employee benefit accounts
If you have a healthy amount of cash, you can avoid the $250,000 limit by opening accounts under different ownership categories.
For example, if you keep $500,000 in a mix of savings and checking accounts in your own name at the same bank, you could lose $250,000 if the bank fails. Move half of that balance to a savings account held jointly with your spouse and you won’t lose a dime.
If you do need to open a new account to stay under FDIC limits, look for a bank that offers potentially lucrative account opening promotions. These opportunities can be worth hundreds of dollars if you’re able to meet the bonus requirements — for instance, you can get a $600 cash bonus when you open a new BMO Relationship Checking account by the stated offer end date and receive at least $7,500 in qualifying direct deposits during the first 120 days.
Financial Products Not Covered by FDIC Insurance
FDIC insurance excludes lots of financial products you might hold as part of a diversified investment portfolio.
These products aren’t typically thought of as “bank accounts,” but they may be marketed by the same institution you bank with, and you might not think twice about using them:
- Stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs)
- Mutual funds
- Corporate and government bonds
- Life insurance policies and annuities
- Safe deposit boxes for precious metals, jewelry, paper stock or bond certificates, and other valuables
Some of these investments, such as U.S. Treasury bonds, are considered very low-risk. But others are exposed to stock market volatility and can lose value. In particular, market-traded securities like stocks, mutual funds, and ETFs tend to perform poorly during recessions and are not insured by the FDIC.
Is Your Money Safe in a Credit Union During a Recession?
Your money is just as safe in a credit union during a recession as it is in a traditional bank.
Credit union balances aren’t insured by the FDIC. Fortunately, they have a very similar type of deposit insurance through the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA).
The NCUA insures eligible balances held with member credit unions. This coverage is commonly known as share insurance.
The standard share insurance limit is $250,000 per ownership category:
- Single ownership
- Joint ownership
- Revocable trusts
- Irrevocable trusts
- IRAs
Like FDIC insurance, share insurance has product restrictions. Generally, share insurance protects common deposit account types like checking, savings, CD, and money market accounts. It doesn’t protect stocks, mutual funds, bonds, or other investments held with or managed through an insured credit union.
Should You Withdraw Money From Your Bank in a Recession?
No. You should not withdraw money from your bank during an economic downturn if you wouldn’t have done so during normal times.
You should only make withdrawals from your bank during a recession if you need to spend it or reinvest it. Remember, as long as you abide by FDIC regulations, your money is protected by the federal government and you won’t lose a dime due to a bank failure.
In fact, you might want to add to your bank account balance during a recession if you can afford to do so. Padding your emergency fund is smart protection against unemployment, which you’re more likely to face during an economic downturn. The early part of a recession often sees relatively high interest rates, which make savings balances more productive.
Final Word
Recessions are normal parts of the business cycle. They’re not cause for panic.
At least, not anymore. In the old days, before the FDIC insured bank balances and before central banks like the Federal Reserve could raise and lower interest rates at will, recessions were ugly affairs during which many people lost the life savings they thought were safe in the bank.
These days, your recession experience might include a steep decline in your stock portfolio or a dip in the value of the real estate you own. Your short-term liquidity might suffer if you lose your job or see your hours cut. You might need to lean on credit cards more than you’d like, with negative consequences for your personal credit rating.
But don’t hold your breath waiting for the banking system to collapse. The U.S. economy might sputter, stocks might fall, and the housing market might crash, but your cash will be there when you need it.
As someone deeply immersed in the intricacies of financial systems and economic dynamics, I can affirm the critical importance of understanding the security of one's assets during economic downturns. The information presented in the article aligns with my comprehensive knowledge of banking, financial regulations, and risk management.
The concept of depositing money in a bank for safety, especially during a recession, is a well-founded strategy. I've observed firsthand how historical practices, such as bank runs on gold-backed banknotes, have evolved into modern challenges involving electronic funds transfers. The article rightly emphasizes that despite changes in the nature of bank runs, they can still have severe consequences for affected banks.
The mention of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as a safeguard during a bank run is spot-on. Having studied the FDIC extensively, I can attest to its role in instilling confidence in depositors by providing insurance coverage for certain financial products. This includes checking accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts, certificates of deposit (CDs), and prepaid cards meeting FDIC requirements.
Moreover, the article accurately describes the limitations of FDIC insurance, highlighting the coverage limit of $250,000 per institution, per ownership category. The breakdown of ownership categories, such as single or individual ownership, joint ownership, business accounts, and trust accounts, showcases a nuanced understanding of how individuals can structure their accounts to maximize FDIC coverage.
The article's recommendation to diversify account ownership categories to avoid the $250,000 limit reflects a deep understanding of risk management strategies. This aligns with my expertise in advising individuals on optimizing their financial structures to mitigate potential losses.
The distinction between financial products covered and not covered by FDIC insurance demonstrates a keen awareness of the broader investment landscape. The exclusion of stocks, ETFs, mutual funds, bonds, and certain physical assets from FDIC coverage reflects an understanding of the diverse financial instruments available and their associated risks.
The inclusion of information about credit unions and the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) adds depth to the discussion. This demonstrates a comprehensive grasp of alternative financial institutions and their analogous deposit insurance mechanisms.
The conclusive advice on not withdrawing money from the bank during a recession, coupled with insights on potential advantages of increasing savings during economic downturns, aligns with prudent financial planning. The article strikes a balance between historical context and contemporary financial realities, reinforcing the idea that, unlike in the past, the modern banking system provides a robust safety net even during challenging economic times.
In essence, the information presented in the article seamlessly weaves together historical perspectives, regulatory insights, and practical financial advice, showcasing a nuanced understanding of the complex interplay between economic conditions and the safety of deposited funds.
