Investing in REITs vs. Direct Real Estate (2024)

Despite the volatility and uncertainty of the housing market over the past three years, real estate remains a valuable part of an investor’s portfolio.

Potential owners are understandably left uneasy as mortgage rates are sharply higher and home prices have slowly declined after a decadelong advance. However, over the long run, we’ve shown that real estate returns tend to fare well. Ideally, your investment portfolio should allocate between 5% and 20% to real estate, but the best avenue for reaching that exposure depends on your situation.

Below, we showcase a continuum of real estate investments by the degree of personal involvement and responsibilities. And here, we break down the benefits and drawbacks of each.

Investing in REITs vs. Direct Real Estate (1)

Pros and Cons of Investing in REITs

More than 45% of American households own REITs, nearly double the estimate from two decades ago. They can be a good fit if you want the diversification benefits of real estate without the commitment and responsibilities of directly owning property.

Investing in REITs vs. Direct Real Estate (2)

REITs can be a good choice because:

  • Buying and selling REIT shares is easier than it is with a physical property.
  • They obviate the need for market-specific knowledge and property management while making it easier to diversify your real estate portfolio. Instead of owning one concentrated position, you own a fraction of tens, hundreds, or thousands.
  • They won’t require you to start a mortgage on an investment property and make investing in out-of-state real estate easier.

Finally, the issue of taxes. REITs enjoy favorable corporate tax treatment, avoiding them entirely if they pass along an adequate share of earnings directly to investors.

However, this typically means REITs have large dividend yields, and dividends are unfavorably taxed relative to capital gains for high-income investors. For those in higher tax brackets, this could be unpalatable. In contrast, direct real estate ownership provides exceptional tax benefits if managed carefully.

Pros and Cons of Investing Directly in Real Estate

On the other hand, if you prioritize agency in an asset by limiting intermediaries, then directly purchasing a property could be right for you.

Substantial tax benefits can be associated with owning, managing, or “flipping” a property. Depending on how actively involved you want to be, you may be granted additional tax breaks for passive losses.

There’s also a wider range of potential outcomes, depending on your property’s type and location, relative to diversified REITs.

Directly investing in real estate can be financially rewarding, but it usually requires significant cash, due-diligence work, and time. Some may rely on a property manager, but this comes at the cost of profit margins. If you need cash, selling a property can take months and be costly, especially if you are not reinvesting the proceeds in another rental property.

With over 70% of rental properties in the United States owned by individual investors, not companies, this investment strategy may be appropriate if you have extra time and cash.

Investing in REITs vs. Direct Real Estate (3)

Should I Invest in Real Estate Directly or Indirectly?

Unraveling the nuances of the housing market can be confusing. Below, we leverage different personas to guide investors toward the right choice.

Investing in REITs vs. Direct Real Estate (4)

A successful and busy professional: Property ownership could be costly or infeasible if you don’t have time to deal with tenants or maintenance, so passively investing is likely the right choice, as REITs minimize time and effort while improving risk-adjusted returns in a mixed-asset portfolio.

Sophisticated or wealthy investors could consider becoming a silent partner to an active investor, which could generate higher returns but comes with substantial risk.

A flexible professional: Early careerists or those with flexible jobs may consider making real estate into a part-time job or hobby. Risk appetite, liquidity needs, and your willingness to earn sweat equity will inform the appropriate choice.

Purchasing a rental property could make sense if you’ve already built a traditional investment nest egg and have excess savings. Your spare time and capital can be invested into a specific asset in the right market, and you can leverage real estate’s tax treatment to boost your aftertax returns. Choosing tenants and working with maintenance providers is the time cost of actively investing in real estate.

Active investors have a wide range of opportunities to pursue. For example, if an investor has an appetite for remodeling, a fixer-upper could be an option. Between the tax benefits and leveraged nature of housing, this approach can compound returns quickly.

However, purchasing an illiquid asset could be a costly mistake if you don’t have an adequate financial cushion or suddenly need cash. On the other hand, buying shares of a diversified REIT at the right price could provide the diversification benefits you’re looking for without limiting portfolio liquidity.

Retired or self-employed: Professionals planning for retirement or without guaranteed income may lean toward real estate for steady income. Depending on the investor’s willingness to get hands-on, either a traditional investment or a REIT may be appropriate.

Empty nesters who plan to downsize or those who want to relocate may benefit from turning their current home into a rental property, especially if property prices are soft. If you purchase a home with a low interest rate and transition it into a rental, your investment property retains this perk and increases your positive cash flow. In addition, since a rental property is not treated as earned income, it is exempt from self-employment tax, or FICA tax. If time is a factor, then hiring a property manager for day-to-day decision-making could be right for you but will offset returns and may still take some of your time.

Shifting your investment strategy to REITs might be appropriate if free time is important to you but you desire a steady income. Perhaps you already have a passive income stream or a sizable investment portfolio. Taking advantage of diversified REITs is a strong choice for keeping your real estate assets liquid and easily investing in properties in various markets.

The author or authors do not own shares in any securities mentioned in this article.Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.

I'm an experienced financial analyst and real estate enthusiast with a deep understanding of the dynamics in both the financial and real estate markets. I've spent years studying and analyzing trends, making informed investment decisions, and navigating the complexities of various investment vehicles. My expertise extends to both traditional real estate ownership and indirect investment methods, such as Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs).

The article highlights the enduring value of real estate in an investor's portfolio, even amid the volatility and uncertainty of the housing market in recent years. It emphasizes the importance of strategic allocation, ranging from 5% to 20%, depending on the investor's situation.

Now, let's break down the key concepts discussed in the article:

  1. Real Estate Investment Portfolio Allocation:

    • Recommended allocation: 5% to 20% of an investment portfolio in real estate.
  2. Real Estate Investment Continuum:

    • The article introduces a continuum of real estate investments based on the degree of personal involvement and responsibilities.
  3. Pros and Cons of Investing in REITs:

    • Over 45% of American households own REITs.
    • Advantages:
      • Ease of buying and selling REIT shares.
      • Diversification benefits without direct property ownership.
      • No need for market-specific knowledge or property management.
      • Avoidance of starting a mortgage on an investment property.
      • Favorable corporate tax treatment for REITs, though with potentially high dividend yields.
    • Disadvantages:
      • Unfavorable taxation of dividends relative to capital gains for high-income investors.
  4. Pros and Cons of Investing Directly in Real Estate:

    • More agency and control over the asset.
    • Substantial tax benefits for direct ownership, management, or "flipping."
    • Potential for higher financial rewards but requires significant cash, due diligence, and time.
    • Wider range of outcomes depending on property type and location.
    • Potential challenges in selling a property quickly.
  5. Factors Influencing Direct vs. Indirect Investment Decision:

    • The article provides guidance based on different investor personas:
      • Busy professionals may prefer passive investing through REITs.
      • Wealthy investors can consider being silent partners for higher returns.
      • Flexible professionals may turn real estate into a part-time job or hobby.
      • Active investors have various opportunities but must consider risk and liquidity.
      • Retired or self-employed individuals may favor real estate for steady income.
  6. Considerations for Specific Investor Profiles:

    • The article tailors advice for successful and busy professionals, flexible professionals, and retired or self-employed individuals based on their risk tolerance, liquidity needs, and time commitment.
  7. Transitioning Investment Strategy:

    • For retirees or those seeking a steady income, real estate may be appealing.
    • Turning a current home into a rental property may benefit empty nesters.
    • Hiring a property manager could be suitable for those with limited time but may impact returns.
  8. Role of REITs for Liquidity and Diversification:

    • REITs are recommended for investors who value free time and liquidity while desiring steady income.

In conclusion, the article provides a comprehensive overview of real estate investment options, catering to a diverse range of investor preferences, financial situations, and goals.

Investing in REITs vs. Direct Real Estate (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Edmund Hettinger DC

Last Updated:

Views: 5690

Rating: 4.8 / 5 (78 voted)

Reviews: 93% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Edmund Hettinger DC

Birthday: 1994-08-17

Address: 2033 Gerhold Pine, Port Jocelyn, VA 12101-5654

Phone: +8524399971620

Job: Central Manufacturing Supervisor

Hobby: Jogging, Metalworking, Tai chi, Shopping, Puzzles, Rock climbing, Crocheting

Introduction: My name is Edmund Hettinger DC, I am a adventurous, colorful, gifted, determined, precious, open, colorful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.