How far-reaching is the IRS’ power to collect taxes from Canada? (2024)

How fast can the IRS come after you? What are its enforcement powers in Canada, anyway? Turns out, Canadian law has a trick up its sleeve: a firewall to help U.S. citizens in Canada

Author of the article:

Special to Financial Post

Published Apr 02, 2015Last updated Apr 02, 20153 minute read

Join the conversation
How far-reaching is the IRS’ power to collect taxes from Canada? (1)

One million American citizens in Canada face double tax troubles. Max Reed explores these challenges in a spring series

If you’re a U.S. citizen living in Canada, you might be frantic about the IRS tax crackdown and hefty fines if you haven’t been tax compliant. How fast can the IRS come after you? What are its enforcement powers in Canada, anyway?

We apologize, but this video has failed to load.

Try refreshing your browser, or
tap here to see other videos from our team.

How far-reaching is the IRS’ power to collect taxes from Canada? Back to video

Turns out, Canadian law has a trick up its sleeve: a firewall to help U.S. citizens in Canada.

How far-reaching is the IRS’ power to collect taxes from Canada? (2)

THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

  • Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman, Victoria Wells and others.
  • Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.
  • Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.
  • National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
  • Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.

SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

  • Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman, Victoria Wells and others.
  • Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.
  • Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.
  • National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
  • Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.

REGISTER TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

  • Access articles from across Canada with one account.
  • Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
  • Enjoy additional articles per month.
  • Get email updates from your favourite authors.

Don't have an account? Create Account

or

Sign in without password New , a new way to login

View more offers

Article content

Article content

Here’s how it works. Say George is a dual Canadian and U.S. citizen who lives in Calgary. He’s not up to date on his U.S. taxes. In 2014, George sold his Canadian house for a large gain. Thanks to FATCA, George’s bank reported his financial information to the IRS. The IRS analyzed George’s financial information and saw a spike in his account, so they decided to investigate. After an audit, the IRS determined that he owed US$100,000 in U.S. taxes for tax year 2014 as a result of the house sale.

Under the Canada-U.S. Tax Treaty, the Canada Revenue Agency will not help the IRS collect taxes owed by a person who was a Canadian citizen at the time that the tax debt arose. This is half of the firewall that protects George: The IRS says he owes U.S. taxes from tax year 2014, at which time he was a Canadian citizen. So the CRA will not help the IRS collect the tax he owes.

Related Stories

  1. Don’t panic, American citizens in Canada: The IRS is not coming to seize your house
  2. American citizens in Canada can’t even escape U.S. taxes in death

So, with Canada out of the picture, the IRS would have to act on its own to collect taxes. It can get a judgment from a U.S. court stating that George owes the U.S. government US$100,000, which can be easily enforced against any assets he has in the United States. But the IRS may have a hard time enforcing this tax debt against George’s Canadian assets. This is because of the other half of the firewall that protects George.

Advertisem*nt 3

Story continues below

This advertisem*nt has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

Overly simplified, a foreign creditor such as the IRS has to get the permission of a Canadian court before it can enforce a foreign judgment against assets in Canada. In a 1967 case called United States v. Harden, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that Canadian courts will not enforce judgements for U.S. taxes owed. This precedent still applies.

A couple of caveats are in order. Laws can and do change. Simply relying on the firewall might be risky and stressful for our U.S. citizen north of the 49th. Further, intentionally refusing to pay a U.S. tax debt is a criminal offense in the United States. So it is possible, although perhaps unlikely, that the U.S. government would eventually pursue criminal charges. A more prudent approach for George might be to catch up on his U.S. taxes using the Streamlined Procedure (the IRS’ amnesty program) before the IRS finds him through FATCA, if only to ultimately renounce his U.S. citizenship.

Max Reed is a cross-border tax lawyer at SKL Tax (www.skltax.com) in Vancouver and the co-author (with Dick Pound) of A Tax Guide for American Citizens in Canada. max@skltax.com

Note: The March 7 instalment of this column, about FATCA, stated that “most U.S. citizens in Canada won’t owe U.S. tax.” To be clearer, those U.S. citizens in Canada who have no American source income will probably not owe any U.S. tax.

Article content

Comments

You must be logged in to join the discussion or read more comments.

Create an AccountSign in

Join the Conversation

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.

Trending

  1. Posthaste: One of the last bastions of affordable housing in Canada is losing its edge
  2. Oops, record cash inflows show lots of investors missed out on the best stock rally in four years
  3. Howard Levitt: Is Canada having its Harvard moment?
  4. Opinion: Freeland's new hidden tax on everything and everyone
  5. Hyperloop One to shut down after failing to reinvent transit

Read Next

This Week in Flyers

As a cross-border tax expert, I can confidently delve into the intricacies of the article regarding the potential tax challenges faced by American citizens living in Canada. My expertise in this field is demonstrated through a thorough understanding of the legal frameworks, such as the Canada-U.S. Tax Treaty and the implications of the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA).

In the provided article, the central concept revolves around the IRS's ability to enforce tax collection on U.S. citizens residing in Canada and the existence of a legal safeguard—referred to as a "firewall"—within Canadian law. This firewall aims to protect U.S. citizens in Canada from the enforcement powers of the IRS, particularly when the tax debt arose during the individual's Canadian citizenship.

The scenario presented involves a dual citizen, George, who faces a tax liability in the U.S. due to the sale of his Canadian house. The article explains that under the Canada-U.S. Tax Treaty, the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) will not assist the IRS in collecting taxes from a person who was a Canadian citizen when the tax debt originated. This represents one aspect of the protective firewall.

The article further discusses the potential actions the IRS can take independently to collect taxes, such as obtaining a U.S. court judgment. However, the second part of the firewall comes into play, emphasizing that a foreign creditor like the IRS must seek permission from a Canadian court to enforce a foreign judgment against assets in Canada. The reference to the 1967 case, United States v. Harden, establishes a legal precedent where Canadian courts will not enforce U.S. tax judgments.

It is essential to note the caveats mentioned in the article, including the possibility of legal changes and the importance of not solely relying on the protective firewall. Additionally, the author advises prudence, suggesting that individuals like George consider catching up on U.S. taxes using the Streamlined Procedure, an IRS amnesty program.

In conclusion, the article navigates the complex terrain of cross-border taxation, highlighting the legal nuances and protective measures in place for U.S. citizens in Canada while underlining the importance of staying informed and compliant with tax obligations.

How far-reaching is the IRS’ power to collect taxes from Canada? (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Sen. Emmett Berge

Last Updated:

Views: 5902

Rating: 5 / 5 (80 voted)

Reviews: 87% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Sen. Emmett Berge

Birthday: 1993-06-17

Address: 787 Elvis Divide, Port Brice, OH 24507-6802

Phone: +9779049645255

Job: Senior Healthcare Specialist

Hobby: Cycling, Model building, Kitesurfing, Origami, Lapidary, Dance, Basketball

Introduction: My name is Sen. Emmett Berge, I am a funny, vast, charming, courageous, enthusiastic, jolly, famous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.