Here's why Richard Branson invested in this 'Shark Tank' reject (that's now worth $1 billion) (2024)

Jamie Siminoff, the CEO and founder of Ring, was rejected by a roomful of celebrity investors during his 2013 appearance on "Shark Tank." All of the sharks except Kevin O'Leary passed, and he made what Siminoff considered an unacceptable offer. He left without a deal.

"I remember after that 'Shark Tank' episode literally being in tears," he tells CNBC Make It. "I needed the money, we were out of money at the time."

But the airing of the episode created enough publicity to drive a flood of sales for Siminoff's company, then called Doorbot, which sold WiFi enabled doorbells. Siminoff, who started the business in his garage, re-branded the company as Ring in 2014 and added new home security products in addition to the doorbells, which let users see and talk to visitors through their smart phones.

Since then, Ring has seen immense growth.

"It has now been four years since 'Shark Tank,' and the business is now valued at $1 billion," Siminoff, 41, says on an update for the show that aired Nov. 12, 2017. "Today we're over 1,300 people, 10 core products, [sold in] 16,000 stores."

Ring CEO Jamie Siminoff

Courtesy of Ring | Brandon Friend-Solis

While the "Shark Tank" investors missed out, there is one celebrity entrepreneur who didn't: Richard Branson.

Ring's video doorbells caught Branson's eye in spring of 2015 through a guest visiting Necker Island, Branson's resort in the British Virgin Islands.

The guest encountered a common problem on his trip: He wasn't around to answer the door for a delivery to his home back in San Francisco. He used Ring's video doorbell and his smartphone to check in with the delivery person as they were dropping off the package.

"[The guest] showed it to Richard, and Richard thought it was wonderful," Siminoff explains. So the customer reached out to Siminoff to tell him about Branson's interest.

"This guy emailed me and Richard and said, 'Hey Jamie, Richard wants to use [the Ring doorbell] as a holiday gift," Siminoff recalls. "I'm thinking, like 'Oh great. I'm introduced to some guy named Richard who wants to buy like 20 of them for the holidays.'"

Then, he caught the last name on the email address. "I'm like, 'Wait a second,'" Siminoff says. "That was Richard Branson."

This wasn't his first encounter with the billionaire. Siminoff — who has been a serial entrepreneur since graduating college — missed a chance to connect with Branson in 2001 when the pair shared an elevator in a hotel, according to Fortune.

"James and I first met by chance in a lift in Brussels many years ago (he didn't do the elevator pitch!)," Branson writes on his blog.

This time, Siminoff took full advantage of the opportunity.

"[Branson] emailed me saying, 'I'd love to give this to my friends for Christmas,'" Siminoff remembers. "We started going back and forth. I slipped in there — I, a little bit of knew what I was doing — but I said, 'That's great because now all your friends will have safer homes and safer neighborhoods.'"

Siminoff explained a bit more about his idea for disrupting the home security industry and peaked Branson's interest.

"Now he's obviously getting interested and realizing this is not just a toy, and he said, 'Well, maybe I could invest,'" Siminoff says. Great news, but the timing was tricky — Ring was already in the midst of raising its Series B.

Siminoff replied to Branson, "If you want to invest, you have to do something like right now.

"He sent over his investment guy literally the next day," says Siminoff.

Branson participated in that $28 million round of funding in 2015, which gave the company a $60 million valuation, according to Ring's blog. Ring's latest round of funding in January 2017 (in which Branson also participated) brought the company's total funding to $209 million, according to The Wall Street Journal. After the round, the Los Angeles Times reported Ring's valuation at $460 million.

Tweet

Branson — a guest investor on "Shark Tank," who Siminoff says owns 5 percent of the business — belives the sharks' loss was his gain.

"I couldn't quite work out why the sharks turned him down, it just seemed to be a wonderful idea," Branson says on the "Shark Tank" update.

"Sorry, Mark [Cuban]," Branson teases.

On his blog, Branson explains that he invested in the company because of its focus on making communities safer.

"I love building companies that have real purpose behind their mission, and this goes for my investments too," Branson writes. "Ring's mission is to reduce crime in neighborhoods. It is a simple, clear, powerful purpose and one that can have a global impact. It is just the type of business I like to invest in, run by a passionate founder who wants to make peoples' lives better and safer through technology."

And for Siminoff, Branson is bringing his big-idea style of leadership to the company.

"He's very hands off from the day-to-day type stuff," Siminoff says. Instead, Branson is much more likely to ask, "What are we doing in five years? 10 years? What is the real big thing that we're going to do next?"

According to Siminoff, "That is the stuff that excites him."

Don't miss: Billionaire Richard Branson: This skill set is the most critical to achieving success

Like this story? Like CNBC Make It on Facebook.

Disclaimer: CNBC owns the exclusive off-network cable rights to "Shark Tank."

Here's why Richard Branson invested in this 'Shark Tank' reject (that's now worth $1 billion) (1)

VIDEO0:5200:52

Richard Branson: This is the most important skill to be successful

Here's why Richard Branson invested in this 'Shark Tank' reject (that's now worth $1 billion) (2024)

FAQs

What is the most successful Shark Tank reject? ›

Ring. One of the most notorious (and successful) Shark Tank rejects started as a video doorbell name Doorbot. After a famously tepid reaction from the sharks, Amazon later bought the company for a deal worth nearly $1 billion.

Who is the most successful investor on Shark Tank? ›

One of the original Sharks, Mark Cuban, has invested the most significant amount, a whopping $61.5 million, and has struck the most deals on screen (218). On the other hand, Kevin O'Leary has appeared in most episodes (291) and seen the most pitches (1161).

Why Shark Tank is bad? ›

Misleading Investor Behavior

The sharks on Shark Tank often come across as ruthless, aggressive, and disconnected from the entrepreneurs they're supposedly trying to help. This dramatized portrayal of investor behavior perpetuates the belief that all investors are rich jerks, which is far from the truth.

Who turned down $30 million on Shark Tank? ›

Three years later, Kang feels zero regret for her decision to pass on the Shark's tantalizing offer. It was the largest offer in Shark Tank history. Mark Cuban offered Arum Kang $30 million for her dating app Coffee Meets Bagel.

What was the worst investment on Shark Tank? ›

The Federal Trade Commission got involved and ordered Breathometer to make full refunds to all of its customers (and take the product off the market). Mark Cuban called it the “worst execution in the history of Shark Tank” and blamed the founder for miss-spending the capital.

What's the most successful product from Shark Tank? ›

Based on lifetime sales metrics, money raised on Shark Tank, and post-show sales performance, Bombas is the most successful product from Shark Tank.

What Shark Tank businesses have failed? ›

Here are five of the biggest “Shark Tank” fails.
  • The Body Jac. ...
  • Breathometer. ...
  • Sweet Ballz. ...
  • Show No Towels. ...
  • Toygaroo.

Do the investors get paid on Shark Tank? ›

It's important to note that while the sharks are paid to be on the show, the money they invest in the entrepreneurs' companies—if they choose to do so—is all their own. The money that Shark Tank investors offer is their own money and is not provided by the show.

Who is the poorest Shark Tank? ›

While she's not the richest Shark (in fact, she's the poorest), Corcoran has a lot to say about what it takes to make it in the business world. See how she went from rags to riches—and exactly what her net worth is today.

Why don t Shark Tank deals go through? ›

Usually, it's the Founder's fault. 90% of the deals fall through because the Founders believed the conditions weren't good for their business even though they took the deal on TV. Then, some deals have taken so long to negotiate that the episode has already aired.

What was the worst Shark Tank pitch? ›

Top 10 Worst Shark Tank Pitches
  1. #1: Ionic Ear. “Episode 101”
  2. #2: RoloDoc. “Episode 501” ...
  3. #3: Wake n' Bacon. “Episode 202” ...
  4. #4: Cougar Limited. “Episode 315” ...
  5. #5: The Sullivan Generator. “Episode 311” ...
  6. #6: Track Days. “Episode 424” ...
  7. #7: Throx. “Episode 108” ...
  8. #8: Squirrel Boss. “Episode 423” ...

What is most successful product sold from Shark Tank? ›

Based on lifetime sales metrics, money raised on Shark Tank, and post-show sales performance, Bombas is the most successful product from Shark Tank.

Who turned down a million dollars on Shark Tank? ›

Deborah Torres: making it on her own

Impressed by her product, the sharks offered Torres $1 million for her company. She turned it down. While some may have jumped at the opportunity that has made household names out of brands like Bombas and Cinnaholic, Torres declined it.

What was the largest offer on Shark Tank history? ›

Mr Cuban said to the businesswomen: “Let me ask you a question. If I offered you $30million (£24.3million) for the company, would you take it?” This represents the largest offer made in Shark Tank history and came as a surprise to his fellow investors.

Has anyone ever gotten all 5 sharks? ›

A father-son duo struck a $125,000 deal with all 5 'Shark Tank' judges: This 'practically never happens' Eyewris cofounders Mark and Kenzo Singer on ABC's “Shark Tank.” Plenty of “Shark Tank” contestants strike a deal with one, or even two, of the entrepreneurship reality show's investor judges.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Cheryll Lueilwitz

Last Updated:

Views: 5731

Rating: 4.3 / 5 (74 voted)

Reviews: 89% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Cheryll Lueilwitz

Birthday: 1997-12-23

Address: 4653 O'Kon Hill, Lake Juanstad, AR 65469

Phone: +494124489301

Job: Marketing Representative

Hobby: Reading, Ice skating, Foraging, BASE jumping, Hiking, Skateboarding, Kayaking

Introduction: My name is Cheryll Lueilwitz, I am a sparkling, clean, super, lucky, joyous, outstanding, lucky person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.