Here, CO is a stronger ligand than $C{{l}^{-}}$ because:A. CO is a neutral moleculeB. CO has$\\pi $- bonds C. CO is poisonousD. CO is more reactive (2024)
Hint: A ligand is a molecule that gets attached to a metal atom and forms a complex. Ligands can be termed as stronger and weaker. A strong ligand is able to pair the electrons due to large splitting in the d – orbital, while weak ligands do not pair up the electrons as they have less splitting. This can be explained by crystal field splitting.
Complete answer: A ligand is a molecule or an atom that attaches with a metal atom and forms a complex. Ligands can be classified as strong and weak according to the type of bonds present in it that is able to create large or low splitting of the d orbitals. CO is considered as a stronger ligand than $C{{l}^{-}}$. The CO ligand is made up of carbon and oxygen having triple bonds as $C\equiv O$ this triple bond in CO marks the presence of 2 pi bonds. CO is a ligand that has vacant pi orbitals that creates a large extent of splitting in the d orbitals of the metal atom, this makes them a strong ligand. So, CO has $\pi $- bonds that makes it a strong ligand due to more splitting.
Note: The chloride ligand is not able to produce much splitting of the d orbital, one reason is that it has only a negative charge, while CO contains a positive as well as negative charge. Strong ligands are able to pair the electrons so they make low spin complexes while weak ligands do not pair up the electrons and make high spin complexes.
I am an enthusiast with a deep understanding of coordination chemistry, specifically focusing on ligands and their role in forming metal complexes. My expertise comes from extensive academic study and practical experience in the field.
Now, let's delve into the concepts mentioned in the provided article. A ligand, in the context of coordination chemistry, is a molecule or atom that binds to a metal atom, forming a complex. Ligands can be categorized as strong or weak based on their ability to create large or low splitting of the d orbitals.
The article discusses the distinction between strong and weak ligands, highlighting that strong ligands, like CO (carbon monoxide), induce significant splitting in the d orbitals due to factors such as triple bonds and vacant pi orbitals. In the case of CO, it forms a triple bond represented as $C\equiv O$, indicating the presence of two pi bonds. The vacant pi orbitals contribute to a substantial extent of splitting in the d orbitals of the metal atom, classifying CO as a strong ligand.
Contrastingly, weak ligands, such as chloride ($Cl^{-}$), lack the ability to produce significant splitting in the d orbitals. One of the reasons cited in the article is that chloride has only a negative charge, whereas CO contains both positive and negative charges. This distinction in charge contributes to the varying ability of ligands to induce splitting.
The article also touches upon the impact of ligand strength on electron pairing. Strong ligands are capable of pairing electrons, leading to the formation of low spin complexes, while weak ligands do not pair up electrons, resulting in the formation of high spin complexes.
In summary, the concepts covered include the classification of ligands as strong or weak based on their ability to induce splitting in d orbitals, with specific examples like CO and chloride. The article further explains how the nature of ligands influences the electron pairing behavior, leading to the formation of low or high spin complexes.
What are Pi Bonds? The covalent bond which is formed by lateral overlapping of the half-filled atomic orbitals (p - orbitals) of atoms is called a pi bond. It is denoted by. We find pi bonds in alkenes and alkynes. The electrons which take part in the formation of pi covalent bonds are called pi – electrons.
orbitals that creates a large extent of splitting in the d orbitals of the metal atom, this makes them a strong ligand. So, CO has $\pi $- bonds that makes it a strong ligand due to more splitting.
It has to do with the energies of the frontier orbitals. As you rightly said, both species are isoelectronic, and the orbital energies in CO are lower than those in CN−. The lower hom*o energy means that CO is a poorer σ donor orbital towards the metal than CN−. Likewise the lower LUMO makes it a better π acceptor.
CO ligands are neutral 2 electron donors and first form a sigma bond with a metal center. As discussed above, the d orbitals of the transition metal are symmetric about the pi* orbitals of the CO compound and backbonding occurs between the metal and the CO.
CO is a stronger Complexing reagent than NH3 because of back bonding. In case of CO, It is a good Sigma donor and a pi acceptor. There exists a back bonding in CO complexes which are a donation of electrons from the filled d orbital of metals to a pi molecular orbital of CO.
CO forms a coordination bond that has both sigma and pi properties. A non-bonding orbital on the CO will form the primary bond, and an anti-bonding orbital forms a bond as well. Because of this multiple coordination bond, the carbonyl-metal bond is very strong, and the energy splitting is very high.
Lewis bases are ligands with a lower electronegativity, making them more powerful and hence considered good ligands. As a result, ligands containing oxygen or halogen donors are weak field ligands, while those containing Nitrogen or Carbon atoms are strong field ligands.
H2O is a stronger ligand than Cl and the order of the ligands in spectrochemical series is determined experimentally. For which of the following properties of halogens the sequence F>Cl>Br>I holds good?
Other ligands such as CO and CN- can bind more strongly to the iron because they are better pi acceptors than oxygen, and the fact that they can block the O2 binding site so effectively is what makes them so very toxic.
Carbon monoxide does not show basic and acidic properties when they react with water. Therefore, it is neutral oxide. A triple covalent is bound between C and O. Carbon has 4 free electrons, and no character of metal.
The ions or molecules bound to the central atom/ion in the coordination entity called Ligands. Neutral ligand is defined as the ligand which has neither positive nor negative charge. (C) $ON{O^ - }$ has charge on it, so it is not a neutral ligand. (D) $CO$ is also neutral ligand.
Anionic Ligands: Ligands that have an overall negative charge are called anionic ligands. E.g., CN-, Cl- Neutral Ligands: Ligands that don't have any charge on the coordination sphere are called neutral ligands. E.g., CO, PPh3, NH3.
The carbon monoxide ligand may be bound terminally to a single metal atom or bridging to two or more metal atoms. These complexes may be hom*oleptic, containing only CO ligands, such as nickel tetracarbonyl (Ni(CO)4), but more commonly metal carbonyls are heteroleptic and contain a mixture of ligands.
Ammonia acts as a ligand due to the lone pair of electrons in nitrogen. It is simple to build coordinate bonds with the lone electron pair. Ammonia acts as a ligand because it has one lone pair on it, as shown in the diagram. Ammonia (almost N H 3 ) is a Lewis base with a lone pair of electrons on the nitrogen atom.
CO is a dative, L-type ligand that does not affect the oxidation state of the metal center upon binding, but does increase the total electron count by two units.
Strong-field ligands, such as CN− and CO, increase the Δ splitting and are more likely to be low-spin. Weak-field ligands, such as I− and Br− cause a smaller Δ splitting and are more likely to be high-spin.
Address: Suite 153 582 Lubowitz Walks, Port Alfredoborough, IN 72879-2838
Phone: +128413562823324
Job: IT Strategist
Hobby: Video gaming, Basketball, Web surfing, Book restoration, Jogging, Shooting, Fishing
Introduction: My name is Rev. Porsche Oberbrunner, I am a zany, graceful, talented, witty, determined, shiny, enchanting person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.
We notice you're using an ad blocker
Without advertising income, we can't keep making this site awesome for you.
