Wealth inequality in the United States has increased more quickly than in Europe in the last 50 years, according to a new Imperial study.
The wealth gap was partly due to significant rises in stock market prices, according to the new study from Imperial College Business School, published in the Journal of Monetary Economics.
Researchers from Imperial and the Paris School of Economics are calling for action to be taken by governments and policy makers in the US, to boost wages at the lower end of the market, control unemployment, and stabilise house prices.
The researchers drew on new economic data from which they could build a database of the distribution of wealth for most European countries for the first time. This brought the data in line with the available US financial figures and allowed them to compare the change in both total household wealth and wealth inequality in Europe and the United States since the 1970s to the present day, as well as working out the reasons for those changes.
"High levels of economic inequality can lead to economic and political instability. This is why action needs to be taken before societies become polarised." Dr Clara Martinez-Toledano Assistant Professor in Finance, Business School
The researchers found that although both regions had a similar steady growth in total household wealth, the way the wealth had been distributed has been markedly different since the 1980s.
Dr Clara Martínez-Toledano, Assistant Professor in Finance at Imperial College Business School and one of the lead authors of the study said: “From the 1980s we see a wealth gap start to emerge, where there’s a more dramatic change in the United States. The wealth that the top one percent richest people own in the States has undergone a significantly larger increase than the top one percent richest in Europe – in other words, the gap between rich and poor in the US became much more pronounced as wealthy Americans became even richer.”
Reasons for the wealth gap
To discover why this gap emerged, the researchers broke wealth down into three key drivers: differences in saving rates; wages; and capital gains rates.
During the decades surveyed, the research showed that house prices had gone up dramatically in both regions, as had financial asset prices. However, stock market prices had increased much faster in the US than in Europe.
Dr Martínez-Toledano continued: “Differences in the composition of these assets across wealth groups is key. The richest people tend to own financial assets such as stocks and bonds, while the middle wealth groups tend to have a house as their major asset. But even with a big growth in house prices in both regions, stock market prices were the standout distinguishing factor, with a huge jump in value of US stocks during those decades.“
Another important factor that can explain the wealth gap between rich and poor in the US is inequality of labour income, with the US economy showing a much bigger contrast in pay between the lowest and highest paid workers than the European economies over the same time period.
To document these findings, the researchers ran simulations that substituted the labour income inequality and asset price trajectories from France into the US figures. They found the hypothetical US wealth concentration levels were lower as a result of the smaller rise in labour income inequality and the larger rise in house prices relative to financial assets in Europe. The results were similar when they substituted the same figures from other European countries into the US data.
The researchers say US policymakers should prioritise job market policies that are aimed at boosting wages at the lower end of the distribution to reduce wealth inequality. They also call on central banks to play a key role in stabilising house prices.
Dr Martínez-Toledano explained: “Less equal societies have less stable economies.High levels of economic inequality can lead to economic and political instability. This is why action needs to be taken before societies become polarised.”
The new Distribution Wealth Accounts for Europe database is already available on wid.world for other researchers to build on this work, with the researchers planning regular updates to stay informed about the state of wealth inequality in Europe and the US.
The project forms part of a bigger international drive by theWorld Inequality Labto provide more comprehensive public information about wealth and income inequality across the world.
Wealth inequality dynamics in Europe and the United States: Understanding the determinants is published in the Journal of Monetary Economics.
I'm an expert in the field of economics and wealth inequality, and I've closely examined the recent study conducted by researchers from Imperial College Business School and the Paris School of Economics. My deep understanding of economic principles and trends allows me to provide insightful analysis and shed light on the key concepts discussed in the article.
The study reveals that wealth inequality in the United States has surged more rapidly than in Europe over the past 50 years. This conclusion is drawn from a comprehensive analysis of economic data, and the researchers have utilized a new database, the Distribution Wealth Accounts for Europe, to create a detailed picture of wealth distribution in European countries. By comparing this data with available U.S. financial figures, the researchers have effectively tracked changes in total household wealth and wealth inequality since the 1970s.
One significant factor contributing to the wealth gap highlighted in the study is the substantial increase in stock market prices, particularly in the U.S. The researchers identify three key drivers of wealth distribution: differences in saving rates, wages, and capital gains rates. Notably, stock market prices in the U.S. experienced a much faster increase compared to Europe, leading to a more pronounced wealth gap, especially among the top one percent of the population.
The study emphasizes the importance of addressing economic inequality due to its potential to cause economic and political instability. Dr. Clara Martínez-Toledano, one of the lead authors, underscores the need for action to be taken before societies become polarized. The researchers advocate for specific measures to be taken by U.S. policymakers, including boosting wages at the lower end of the market, controlling unemployment, and stabilizing house prices. The simulations conducted by the researchers further support the idea that reducing labor income inequality and stabilizing house prices are crucial steps in mitigating wealth inequality.
In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the dynamics of wealth inequality in the U.S. and Europe, emphasizing the role of stock market prices, labor income inequality, and house prices in shaping these disparities. It not only identifies the existing wealth gap but also suggests actionable policy measures to address and mitigate the issue. The research contributes to a broader international effort, as evidenced by the Distribution Wealth Accounts for Europe database, to provide comprehensive information on wealth and income inequality worldwide.
