Fossil fuel divestment funds rise to $6tn (2024)

The funds committed to fossil fuel divestment now total more than $6tn (£4.6tn), with almost 1,000 institutional investors having made the pledge, according to a new report.

The sell-off of coal, oil and gas investments is led by the insurance industry, with $3tn of funds. But it also now includes the first nation to divest, Ireland, major cities including New York and key medical organisations. Major oil companies such as Shell have this year cited divestment as a material risk to its business.

Fossil fuel divestment began on US university campuses in 2011 but now spans 37 nations around the world. Supporters of divestment say existing fossil fuel resources are already far greater than can be burned without causing catastrophic climate change and that exploring for and producing more fossil fuels is therefore morally wrong. They also say fossil fuel companies are risky investments as global action on emissions gets tougher.

Some investors argue that remaining as shareholders and persuading fossil fuel companies to change can be more effective. However, another new report finds this approach has not delivered any significant change to date.

The new divestment report, by Arabella Advisors, calculates that investors with $6.2tn in assets under management have committed to divest from fossil fuels, up from $5.2tn in the previous report in 2016.

“I commend the divestment movement for its incredible progress,” said Mary Robinson, former UN high commissioner on human rights and former president of Ireland.

Bill de Blasio, mayor of New York City, and Sadiq Khan, mayor of London, which is in the process of divesting, said in a joint article for the Guardian: “We must use our economic might to accelerate the transition to a low-carbon economy. Taking this kind of action now could help us make a crucial difference to the people we represent and the future of our planet.

Fossil fuel divestment funds rise to $6tn (2)

Jeremy Grantham, co-founder of GMO, one of the world’s most influential asset management companies, said the financial case for divestment was compelling. “Investors with long-term horizons should avoid oil stocks on investment grounds. They face a sustained headwind. Ethical arguments for divestments are simply not necessary. They are a pure bonus,” he said.

Another new report, from Genus Capital Management in Canada, said its fossil free fund had outperformed a benchmark of standard stock market indices by almost 2% per year over the last five years. The company’s Fossil Free CanGlobe Equity Fund is a mix of Canadian and global stocks. “At the five-year mark, we can conclusively say: divesting from fossil fuels pays,” said CEO Wayne Wachell.

The Arabella Advisors report noted that the American Medical Association (AMA) and the UK’s Royal College of General Practitioners had both divested. “It is unwise to own fossil fuels companies long-term and the products of these companies are harmful to human health by producing dangerous air pollution and contributing to global climate change,” said Dr Todd Sack at the AMA.

Divestment appears to be concerning oil and gas majors. In Shell’s last annual report it states: “It could have a material adverse effect on the price of our securities and our ability to access equity capital markets.” Furthermore, the World Bank Group has committed to stopping funding oil and gas development and major insurers including Swiss Re have decided to stop underwriting coal projects.

The report on investor engagement on with fossil fuel companies, from shareholder advocacy group As You Sow, found that 160 climate change shareholder resolutions were filed at 24 US oil and gas companies between 2012 and 2018.

Fossil fuel divestment funds rise to $6tn (3)

However, none of the companies have adopted plans or targets to cut greenhouse gas emissions from burning fossil fuels and most are investing to maintain or expand production. “The oil and gas sector has not stepped up to address the growing risks to their companies, the broader economy, and our planet,” said Andrew Behar, As You Sow CEO.

The call for ethical investment was backed by Pope Francis in June 2018, when he addressed the heads of oil companies. He said “disturbing and a cause for real concern” that carbon emissions were still rising and added: “Even more worrying is the continued search for new fossil fuel reserves, whereas the Paris agreement clearly urged keeping most fossil fuels underground.”

Ellen Dorsey, at the philanthropic Wallace Global Fund, said the pressure to divest would continue. “Today, our movement pledges to increase divested global assets to $10tn by 2020.”

She said investing in clean energy was as important as pulling funds from polluting firms: “Investors should also commit at least 5% of their portfolio to climate solutions to help rapidly scale to 100% renewable energy and universal energy access.”

Robinson backed the clean investment call: “This is what climate justice requires.”

Fossil fuel divestment funds rise to $6tn (2024)

FAQs

What is the argument against fossil fuel divestment? ›

As consumers, we're the ones ultimately responsible for the anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions that threaten the planet. Divestment, by shifting the blame to extracting companies, creates the impression that someone else is responsible. This works against solving the problem.

How much money has been divested from fossil fuels? ›

In April 2020, the number of institutions had grown to 1192, with a total combined asset value of $14,14 trillion. As of July 2023, more than 1593 institutions with assets totalling more than $40.5 trillion in assets worldwide had begun or committed some form of divestment of fossil fuels.

Which banks don t invest in fossil fuels? ›

The Co-operative Bank

The Co-operative Bank has had an ethical policy since 1992, meaning it doesn't lend to companies that don't fit with its values, so it doesn't do business with the oil, coal or gas industries.

Who is the largest financier of fossil fuels? ›

At the top of that list is JPMorgan Chase, the largest funder of fossil fuels cumulatively since the Paris Agreement on climate change was signed in 2016, according to the report. Citi, Wells Fargo, and Bank of America are also among the top five fossil financiers since 2016, the report found.

What are the two main arguments against fossil fuels? ›

Producing and burning fossil fuels creates air pollution that harms our health and generates toxic emissions that drive climate change. From the electricity that lights our homes to the cars we drive to work, modern life was built on fossil fuels like coal, oil and natural gas.

What is bad about fossil fuel subsidies? ›

In general, most fossil fuel subsidies are implicit. This means that they fail to consider the negative externalities of fossil fuel production, such as the environmental and human health consequences of GHG emissions and particulate matter pollution.

Who profits from fossil fuels? ›

Fossil Fuel Profits Skyrocket as World Leaders Set to Gather at COP28
Company NameThird Quarter 2023 Net IncomeFirst Quarter 2023 Net Income
ExxonMobil$9,346,000,000$11,430,000,000
Chevron$6,526,000,000$6,540,000,000
Shell$7,044,000,000$8,709,000,000
TotalEnergies$6,676,000,000$5,557,000,000
12 more rows
Nov 21, 2023

Who makes money from fossil fuels? ›

Exxon, Chevron and Shell reported robust earnings and large payouts to investors as they continued to expand their fossil-fuel production.

Who funds the fossil fuel industry? ›

One said the world's 60 largest banks, led by JPMorgan Chase, Citi, Wells Fargo and Bank of America, have poured an overall $5.5 trillion into fossil fuel projects since the Paris agreement went into effect in 2016.

What bank is the most ethical? ›

U.S. Bancorp has been recognized for its approach to digital innovation, community partnerships and customer service, including being named one of the 2023 World's Most Ethical Companies and Fortune's most admired superregional bank.

Which is the most ethical building society? ›

The UK's most ethical banks and building societies
  • Triodos Bank.
  • Charity Bank.
  • Ecology Building Society.
  • The Co-operative Bank.
  • Coventry Building Society.
  • Nationwide Building Society.
  • Starling Bank.
  • Gatehouse Bank.
Apr 3, 2024

Which bank is the greenest? ›

The top 10 most sustainable banks in the world in 2023
  • #8 Rabobank (Netherlands) ...
  • #7 BNP Paribas (France) ...
  • #6 Crédit Agricole (France) ...
  • #5 DBS Bank (Singapore) ...
  • #4 Swedbank (Sweden) ...
  • #3 Standard Chartered (UK) ...
  • #2 ING Bank (Netherlands) ...
  • #1 KfW (Germany)
Feb 20, 2023

What companies burn the most fossil fuels? ›

Which companies emit the most CO2?
  • China Coal 14.3 %
  • Saudi Aramco 4.5 %
  • Gazprom OAO 3.9 %
  • National Iranian Oil Co 2.3 %
  • ExxonMobil Corp 2.0 %
  • Coal India 1.9 %
  • Petróleos Mexicanos 1.9 %
  • Russia Coal 1.9 %

Which corporations use the most fossil fuels? ›

CharacteristicEmissions in billion metric tons of CO₂ equivalent
Saudi Aramco64.83
Gazprom47.75
Chevron44.72
ExxonMobil43.65
9 more rows
Feb 20, 2024

What industries consume the most fossil fuels? ›

The transportation sector accounts for the largest share of U.S. petroleum consumption.
  • The percentage share of total U.S. petroleum consumption by major end-use sectors in 2022 was:
  • transportation 66.6%
  • industrial 27.5%
  • residential 2.8%
  • commercial 2.5%
  • electric power 0.6%

What are the arguments against divestment? ›

Another key point to consider is that divestment may come at a cost, meaning lost returns. Companies that are under pressure due to controversial activity can adopt strategies to mitigate or adapt, recovering their value. When shareholders divest from contentious companies, they lose the potential investment benefit.

Why are people against fossil fuels? ›

Fossil fuels pollution is bad for health. The combustion of fossil fuels causes air pollution, which contributed to 1.2 million deaths in 2020 alone.

What are the effects of divesting from fossil fuels? ›

Divesting from fossil fuels puts pressure on the government to change law and policy for a more sustainable future. The decisions we make today about our investments are likely to impact future generations. By divesting from fossil fuels, charities can once again step forward as leaders of change.

What are the arguments in favor of fossil fuels? ›

Advantages of fossil fuels

The advantages of fossil fuel use are mostly attributed to the convenience and ease of using well-established energy methods. Despite their convenience, the continued use of fossil fuels is leading to negative environmental impacts.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Pres. Carey Rath

Last Updated:

Views: 5810

Rating: 4 / 5 (61 voted)

Reviews: 92% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Pres. Carey Rath

Birthday: 1997-03-06

Address: 14955 Ledner Trail, East Rodrickfort, NE 85127-8369

Phone: +18682428114917

Job: National Technology Representative

Hobby: Sand art, Drama, Web surfing, Cycling, Brazilian jiu-jitsu, Leather crafting, Creative writing

Introduction: My name is Pres. Carey Rath, I am a faithful, funny, vast, joyous, lively, brave, glamorous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.