Following the Herd Won’t Save You. 60-40 Stocks Not Enough (2024)

In 2000,bonds were paying nearly 7%.Today, bonds are paying out at all-time lows.

Why does this matter?

Because in 2000, if you had a 60/40 split – 60% stocks and 40% bonds in your portfolio – you weathered the storm better than investors overly weighted in stocks. Those high bond yields helped somewhat compensate for the battering taken by stocks.

We Are Different Because We Are Laser Focused On Helping You Achieve Financial Serenity Through Our Proven Comprehensive Goals-Based Planning & Investing Strategies.

The biggest Financial Planners' Mistake That Will Hurt Your Financial Security!

Following the Herd Won’t Save You. 60-40 Stocks Not Enough (1)Following the Herd Won’t Save You. 60-40 Stocks Not Enough (2)

Following the Herd Won’t Save You. 60-40 Stocks Not Enough (3)

How To Find Your GO-TO High Net Worth Financial Planner

Following the Herd Won’t Save You. 60-40 Stocks Not Enough (4)Following the Herd Won’t Save You. 60-40 Stocks Not Enough (5)

Following the Herd Won’t Save You. 60-40 Stocks Not Enough (6)

How Pillar's High Net Worth Financial Planning Process Is Different

Following the Herd Won’t Save You. 60-40 Stocks Not Enough (7)Following the Herd Won’t Save You. 60-40 Stocks Not Enough (8)

Following the Herd Won’t Save You. 60-40 Stocks Not Enough (9)

Multi-Family Office For Ultra-High Net Worth Families

Following the Herd Won’t Save You. 60-40 Stocks Not Enough (10)Following the Herd Won’t Save You. 60-40 Stocks Not Enough (11)

Following the Herd Won’t Save You. 60-40 Stocks Not Enough (12)

Founder & Managing Member Pillar Wealth Management

Following the Herd Won’t Save You. 60-40 Stocks Not Enough (13)Following the Herd Won’t Save You. 60-40 Stocks Not Enough (14)

Following the Herd Won’t Save You. 60-40 Stocks Not Enough (15)

Following the Herd Won’t Save You. 60-40 Stocks Not Enough (16)Following the Herd Won’t Save You. 60-40 Stocks Not Enough (17)

Following the Herd Won’t Save You. 60-40 Stocks Not Enough (18)Following the Herd Won’t Save You. 60-40 Stocks Not Enough (19)

But today, in the midst of the coronavirus crash, that bond yields cushion isn’t nearly as fluffy with 10-year Treasury yields being at all-time lows. The following article will give you insight into the asset allocation portfolios.

Understanding Asset Classes

Hundreds of sectors or industries trade their assets on the stock market. If you look at the S&P 500 index, there are several sectors that are available such as industrials, health care, technology, real estate, and many more. Those sectors can differ based on several aspects. Those aspects are:

Risk vs Return

The stock’s price sometimes depends on the growth, but the other is value. Some stocks will give you a high dividend price, while others use the profit to reinvest. If you are expecting a high return, then you need to risk more.

Capitalization

There are hundreds even thousands of multinational companies on the stock market, from small to large. The value of the company determines the capitalization, that is, the number of shares multiplied by the stock price.

Testimonial From Satisfied Clients

Chris Snyder

Thank you Chris for your guidance over the past 17years. We made it through several market swings and covid. We have a comfortable feeling working with you. And it is always sharing our stories over the years of our children’s growth. ◼ Relationship to Financial Advisor: Current Client ◼ Compensation: This reviewer received no compensation

Steve

I highly recommend Pillar Wealth Management

At 51, I lost my husband to cancer. We owned our own business, so the loss of considerable income at his death was a magnificent hardship. In addition, a significant personal investment became insolvent, causing the loss of millions. A happy, comfortable, and financially-secure life was gone in an instant. My home and a few

Lori S.

Pillar Wealth Management

When I retired the need arose to have help with balancing our investment risk level. Our trusted Accountant recommended Pillar Wealth Management. In the past we took a sizeable loss and could no longer take that level of risk with the balance of savings for retirement. Chris helped us transfer these investments and rebalances our

Anita K.

Testimonial from Col. Robert B.

I have worked with Chris Snyder, handling my investments for over 30 years. During this time I developed a personal relationship with Chris and am very pleased with the personal attention he has paid to my investments. When I was getting ready to retire I looked into what my retirement income would be. I wanted

Robert B.

Chris and Hutch

Chris and Hutch knew they had to build their business based on personal contact and trust. They invested in this aspect and offered seminars over free dinners to get to know their clients on a personal level. This allowed us to get to know Chris personally and realize that we see the world and politics

Andrea

Thanks so much for making our life effortless

With our retirement we were searching for an advisor to invest our money. We found an advisor who seemed knowledgeable. She promised the moon with large investments. When our paperwork arrived it wasn’t anything we agreed upon. We were so lucky to have quickly found Chris. He stepped in and invested our money. We have

Patty

Chris Synder & Pillar Wealth Management

In 2022, I moved my portfolio over to Chris Snyder and his team. They’ve been a great asset in advising me on everything needed to plan for my short term financial needs as well as getting me to my retirement which is coming in a few years. They are very approachable, detailed and explain the

Lynn G.

Chris Snyder & PWM

Prior to signing up with PWM we had self-managed our investments. That worked out pretty well with the ongoing bull market. Even with the occasional downturn, paper losses were quickly reversed. But as retirement neared it became clear a better plan was needed to turn those investments into a reliable income stream that would facilitate

Keith B.

Chris Snyder

It is our pleasure to write in support of Chris Snyder. After more than 16 years of working with Chris we feel fortunate to have access to his professional advice always with prompt, clear and up to date answers to our questions. The professional work he does has been continuous and gives us confidence that

Jim

Chris Snyder

Chris has been a wonderful financial advisor. He listens and makes adjustments if necessary. I believe him to be fair, honest, intelligent and knowledgeable. ◼ Relationship to Financial Advisor: Current Client ◼ Compensation: This reviewer received no compensation for this review. ◼ Conflicts of Interest: There are no material conflicts of

Barbara

Right decision to have fiduciary financial advisor

Prior to Pillar Wealth Management, our investments were in CDs, non-interest checking & savings, annuities, IRAs, 457Kplan, Term Life Insurance, etc. We felt overwhelmed managing on our own and knew we need a fiduciary financial advisor to help us simplify and better manage our finances. In January 2022, my sister recommended Christopher Snyder (Pillar Wealth

Gaoiran

Great firm!

My husband started an account with Chris Snyder over 17 years ago. Chris has been an invaluable help during all the market ups and downs. He is also always ready to help me think through other financial aspects that come up and will refer me to someone else if he doesn’t feel he is the

Linda S.

Chris at Pillar Wealth

My husband and I have been extremely pleased with Chris’s handling of our investments. He always has our best interests in mind. He will answer any question we have and explain why he has done what he has done. If we prefer another or different strategy we discuss it with Chris and he gives us

Judy

5 Stars

I have been a client of Pillar Wealth for over 25 years. My advisor is Chris Snyder and he is wonderful, we have shared so much about our families for 25 years. He knows my goals and has helped me achieve them financially. I trust Pillar Wealth implicitly. ◼ Relationship to Financial Advisor: Current Client

Gloria R.

5 Stars

Chris you’ve been our advisor for many, many years. We couldn’t be happier with all the service you’ve provided for us. ◼ Relationship to Financial Advisor: Current Client ◼ Compensation: This reviewer received no compensation for this review. ◼ Conflicts of Interest: There are no material conflicts of

James

Exceptional Advisors

I have been with Pillar Wealth Management for over 25 years. We have weathered more than a few ups and downs. Chris has always steered me in the right direction. When I hear from others how they have lost so much with their current advisors, I am reminded of the guidance I get from everyone

Thomas W.

Long time Association

We have worked with Chris for many years and feel like we are friends. I was trying to find the year that we began working with Pillar, but couldn’t find it. We met Chris in Pleasant Hill at a seminar. We invested a small amount, as that is all that we had at the time

Marilyn L.

Our financial advisor for 27 years.

My husband and I have had the pleasure of working with Chris Snyder at Pillar Wealth Management since 1996, 27 years. Lots of life happened in those years, assessing our financial readiness to retire, retiring in California, moving to France, resettling, moving to Florida, setting up trusts, husbands passing, moving to Arizona. Chris helped us

Elaine S.

Chris Synder

I’ve been a Chris client for about 25 years. Through those years Chris and I and our families have grown together. Chris has helped me through some very difficult times and has kept my investment including monthly withdrawals at pretty much the same as my beginning investment. I am very comfortable with Chris as my

JMenzhuber

Hutch, Chris & Pillar Wealth Management

Hutch, Chris and staff are awesome! they are very professional and amazingly responsive. We are newer clients and recently moved to Idaho and they have been so helpful to us! I learned more talking to Hutch for 10 minutes about some specifics on accounts than I ever did from a previous advisor we had for

Mark G.

Chris, Hutch and Pillar Wealth Management

One of our best-ever decisions: turning to Hutch Ashoo and Chris Snyder at Pillar for financial guidance. My wife Bonnie and I were introduced to them in 2009 when we sold our small tech company and retired. Baffled by the complexities of managing our modest finances to ensure a safe and comfortable retirement, we interviewed

Bonnie

Following the Herd Won’t Save You. 60-40 Stocks Not Enough (20)

What is in a 60/40 portfolio?

A 60/40 portfolio contains 60% stocks and 40% bonds. It has traditionally been considered a “safe” asset allocation mix because the portfolio will always bounce back after a bad year.

Is 60/40 still a good allocation?

This strategy may still be good because in the long run, stocks always go up. However, investing in the stock market is never without risk or guaranteed to be profitable.

What is the average annual return of a 60/40 portfolio?

Since the Great Depression, the average annual return for the 60/40 portfolio has been 11.5%. It has been 9.61% for an 80/20 portfolio. Accounting for inflation, the S&P500 has yielded a 7% return.

Why is a 60/40 portfolio no longer good enough?

With longer life expectancies and retirees depending on their portfolios for decades, bonds may not meet their income needs. They should be balanced with a higher percentage of equities.

How do you build a 60/40 portfolio?

A 60/40 portfolio contains 60% stocks and 40% bonds. It is structured to minimize risk while producing returns, but the returns will be smaller than those with a greater ratio of stocks.

What is an 80/20 portfolio?

An 80/20 portfolio has 80% invested in stocks and 20% in bonds. It can be expected to yield a 9% return. A retiree could benefit more from a 75/20 split, with 5% in cash.

Should I have bonds in my portfolio 2022?

Some fixed-income investments, such as bonds, are always a good hedge against the volatility of stocks. Add some cash or cash equivalents, with the rest going into equities markets.

What is the historical rate of return for a 60/40 portfolio?

The historical rate of return for a 60/40 portfolio is 11.5%, on average. There is always risk in having a high percentage invested in stocks, so it’s important to choose stocks wisely.

What is the average return of a 70/30 portfolio?

The 70/30 portfolio had an average annual return of 9.96% For 2022, however, US and international equities are down as much as 9.9%, and fixed-income vehicles are down 4.8% (Capital Group).

What is replacing the 60/40 portfolio?

Currently, many advisors are recommending a higher proportion of stocks and a lower one of fixed-income vehicles. The importance of looking at investing as a long-term affair must be recognized.

Following the Herd Won’t Save You. 60-40 Stocks Not Enough (21)

4 Things You Should Know About Asset Allocation for Stocks and Bonds

  1. Ultra Aggressive Portfolio
  2. Conservative Portfolio
  3. Moderately Aggressive or 80/20 Portfolio
  4. An Aggressive Portfolio

When investing, you have to know about asset allocation. Basically, asset allocation is the way you divide your assets into different classes, which include cash, securities, stocks, and bonds. Based on those allocations, your main goal is to maximize your return and minimize your risk. In allocating your assets, you have to prioritize them from most aggressive to safest, which can affect your return. The portfolio percentage is calculated based on the risk tolerance and time horizon. If you are still confused about asset allocation, here is an explanation:

1. Ultra Aggressive Portfolio

If you want a return of 9% or more, you should allocate 100% to stocks, which means that your portfolio contains only stocks. This portfolio will provide you with stable capital growth for the long-term. However, in the short-term, the growth for this kind of portfolio varies widely.

2. Conservative Portfolio

Some people do not want to risk their capital. Therefore, they choose the ‘safer’ way of allocating their assets. If you want to keep your capital rather than acquiring high returns, this kind of portfolio is suitable for you. You need to allocate not more than 50% on stocks. Although you may not want to invest in stocks at all, you may be tempted because investing in stocks can offset inflation.

3. Moderately Aggressive or 80/20 Portfolio

If you have a long-term target and seek a rate of return of at least 8%, you should allocate 80% of your portfolio to stocks and the rest to bonds or cash. This portfolio is considered to have a medium level of risk tolerance.

4. An Aggressive Portfolio

This portfolio is focused on equities, whose value can change daily. The main goal of this portfolio is to acquire long-term capital growth. This portfolio is usually called a capital growth strategy.

Asset allocation is very important as it will affect your returns. Your assets can be in the form of bonds, stocks, or other investments. In fact, how you allocate your assets can be very crucial. Some investment experts have said that it is better not to allocate 100% of your assets to stocks. This is debatable because if you are lucky in the stock market, you will earn a high return even though it is highly risky.

The 60/40 Wall Street Myth of Stability

All too often we talk to prospects who come to us shocked that they have lost so much money. They were convinced that their advisors had been managing their money well.

But the truth is usually unveiled during vicious crashes like that of Covid-19.

When we look at their portfolios it blows our minds how frequently they are 60/40, or due to neglect by their advisor (neglected to rebalance or were greedy when times are good), they started as 60/40 and they are now 70/30 or even 80/20! No wonder they lost so much money.

Many of the biggest pensions and investment firms use a 60% stock/40% bondasset allocation, in part because it is considered more stable than ones more heavily weighted in stocks, but also more lucrative than ones leaning more toward bonds.

However, what does historical data actually show about the performance a 60/40 split?

From March 2000 until March 2020 – a 20-year period – a 60/40 split earned 5.27% annually while the S&P500 made 4.79%. And that’s beforetaxes and fees. It actually beatthe market. No wonder Wall Street uses this as a cookie-cutter formula to sell high and ultra-high net worth investors on this model.

However, it is also true that from Oct 2007 through March 2009, a 60/40 portfolio lost about 33%. To make things worse, it took this 60/40 model 603 days to recover back to even.

Imagine retiring October 2007 and entrusting your $30 million to a money manager or Wall Street/Big Bank financial advisor who, based on the firms’ pre-determined cookie-cutter investing (YES, that’s how they do it, even the biggest and so-called best), placed you in what amounted to a 60/40 model! Now imaging the collapse of the market and bottoming out March of 2009, similar to what recently happened with Covid-19. You would have lost about $10 million excluding the withdrawals you would have made to sustain your lifestyle. Here you are in October 2007, with the mindset that you will never spend all $30 million you worked so hard to save, thinking how did I get here (with less than $20 million in savings) and will my money last my lifetime!

For high net worth and ultra-high net worth families – especially those within five years of retirement or already retired – you might not have time to make up your losses. Chances are, you also don’t have such an appetite for losses. It is time for you to prepare your portfolio that can ease you to enjoy your ‘nest egg’ day.

If you agree 60/40, 70/30 or 80/20 asset allocation strategies have failed you, but you’re ready to take action,perhaps a short chat with our CEO and Co-founder, Hutch Ashoois in order. As a fiduciary, independent financial advisor, he advises high and ultra-high net worth investors how to protect their wealth and maximize gains, offering the best of both worlds.

What Does Your Financial Advisor Say about 60/40?

The question is – why would you want to risk losing $10 million of your investments just because so many others are using the same strategy?

And if you have a wealth manager or financial advisor who calls themselves a fiduciary, are they really acting in your best interests if they aren’t sharing this historical performance data with you? Honestly, we truly believe most financial advisors don’t even understand the risks themselves. They are merely foot soldiers to the Wall Street firms and Big Banks. They are given a program to evaluate you and then place your money is what is most likely 60/40. Then ‘stay the course is the best advice they have to offer while you’re losing millions?

PillarWealth Managementtakes our fiduciary duty very seriously.We refuse to blindly followwhat everyone else is doing when real performance data from history shows how fraught with peril that approach really is.

The 60/40 approach fails miserably in a majormarket crash. And in the current crisis, it is failing again, down over 12% as of March 17th, 2020 since the peak in February.

So shouldn’t we be looking for something better?

What to Do Differently

We want you to make good money during good times but not lose it all during bad times.

We have developed models to help our ultra-high net worth and high net worth clients capture most of the gains but few of the losses. We custom build a model for each client since prospects come to us with different investment strategies, and we don’t blindly sell based on a cookie-cutter program. As such, we can achieve a level of performance similar to 60/40, but while controlling the down-side risk!

In other words, performance was strong in good years, but held its ground in the downturns.

We are so focused on principal preservation that we wrote the book about it,The Art Of Protecting Ultra-High Net Worth Portfolios And Estates, Strategies For Families Worth $25 Million to $500 Million. You can buy it on Amazon byclicking here.

How Is Your Portfolio Doing During the Current Crisis?

If at this starting point you are wondering if you have the right financial advisor to truly serve your ultra-high net worth needs then we urge you to download our free 2020 Covid-19 updated bookThe Ultimate Guide To Choosing The Best Financial Advisor, For Investors With $5 million to $500 million liquid assets by clicking here.”

Imagine that something worst happens because you are in the bear markets where average annual prices of securities drop by 20%. If you’re feeling the pain of loss that many others are experiencing and your wealth manager’s best advice is to ‘stay the course’ and trust that ‘markets always go up over time,’ we would respectfully suggest that you need a new wealth manager.

Those boilerplate platitudes don’t serve anyone well, especially ultra-high net worth investors who don’t want to wipe out the last ten years of growth because their advisor stuck them with a 60/40 split and told them it would hold up.

It won’t. And it isn’t.

As an ultra-high net worth investor, you deserve better.

60/40 asset allocation is flawed. It’s one reason why Pillar Wealth Management refuses to sort investors into cookie-cutter, one-size-fits-none investment plans.

You deserve a custom-prepared investment developed specifically to you and your wealth goals.

To find out more about our custom investment plans for high and ultra-high net worth clients, we encourage you tohave a short conversation with our CEO and Co-founder, Hutch Ashoo. With over 30 years of experience in bad markets as well as good, Hutch can give you the objective, independent guidance you need right now.

Schedule a chat with true fiduciary and ultra-high net worth wealth manager Hutch Ashoo

The Future of the 60/40 Portfolio

History

This year, 2022, is not yet the worst year for the 60/40 portfolio (60% stocks/40% bonds), but it could be. Historically, however, a bad year for the 60/40 portfolio has been followed by years with an average of 11.5% returns. So, this strategy may not be dead yet, and investors would need to wait and see.

In the past, the Federal Reserve could control inflation, reducing the correlation between stocks and bonds. Also, stocks and bonds tended to benefit from falling real yields.

What’s Ahead

Higher inflation could lead to a stronger correlation between stocks and bonds, thereby reducing the diversification benefit of the 60/40 mix. Bond prices are dropping with the increased interest rates imposed by the Fed. Rising inflation is likely to result in rising real yields, leading to lower returns. And the Federal Reserve may be less able to intervene to support asset prices.

How to Prepare

Do not overreact. Remember why the 60/40 strategy has worked in the past and that investing is a long-term affair.

Tax-efficient investing, such as tax-loss harvesting can boost your returns.

Diversification is never a bad thing. Consult with an advisor for the best mix of assets, with various levels of risk (e.g., high-interest savings accounts for low risk), that you should consider. Always keep at least 5% of your wealth in cash to cover those bad years. Look at alternative investments for a relatively small percentage of your mix.

You could benefit from having more than one advisor. Talk to some different advisors to get educated on the possibilities.

Authors

To be 100% transparent, we published this page to help filter through the mass influx of prospects, who come to us through our website and referrals, to gain only a handful of the right types of new clients who wish to engage us.

We enjoy working with high net worth and ultra-high net worth investors and families who want what we call financial serenity – the feeling that comes when you know your finances and the lifestyle you desire have been secured for life, and that you don’t have to do any of the work to manage and maintain it because you hired a trusted advisor to take care of everything.

More from authors.

As an expert in financial planning and investing, it's evident that the article addresses the challenges and shortcomings of the traditional 60/40 portfolio strategy, especially in the context of the current economic environment. The author emphasizes the need for a more nuanced approach to asset allocation, taking into account factors such as changing bond yields, market volatility, and the impact of major economic events like the coronavirus crash.

Let's break down the key concepts covered in the article:

  1. 60/40 Portfolio:

    • A 60/40 portfolio traditionally consists of 60% stocks and 40% bonds.
    • This allocation is considered "safe" and has historically been used for its stability during market downturns.
  2. Historical Performance of 60/40 Portfolio:

    • The article provides historical data, stating that from March 2000 to March 2020, a 60/40 portfolio earned an annual return of 5.27%, outperforming the S&P500's return of 4.79%.
  3. Challenges with 60/40 Portfolio:

    • Despite historical success, the article argues that the 60/40 strategy may no longer be sufficient, especially in the face of longer life expectancies and retirees relying on portfolios for extended periods.
    • It highlights instances where the 60/40 portfolio suffered significant losses during market crashes, such as the one in 2008.
  4. Current Economic Environment:

    • The article references the coronavirus crash and how the cushion provided by bond yields is less effective due to all-time low Treasury yields.
  5. Asset Allocation and Risk Tolerance:

    • The piece emphasizes the importance of asset allocation, considering factors like risk tolerance and time horizon.
    • It introduces different portfolio types, including ultra-aggressive, conservative, moderately aggressive (80/20), and aggressive portfolios.
  6. Alternative Strategies:

    • The article suggests that investors may benefit from considering alternative strategies and moving away from the traditional 60/40 allocation.
    • It challenges the conventional wisdom of 'stay the course' during market downturns.
  7. Importance of Customization:

    • The authors stress the need for customized investment plans tailored to individual clients rather than relying on generic, one-size-fits-all approaches.
  8. Fiduciary Responsibility:

    • The term "fiduciary" is used, indicating a commitment to acting in the best interests of clients.
  9. Role of Financial Advisors:

    • Testimonials from clients are provided, praising the financial planning services of Pillar Wealth Management and their founders, Chris Snyder and Hutch Ashoo.
  10. Preparing for Market Challenges:

    • The article offers advice on how investors can prepare for challenges, including not overreacting, tax-efficient investing, diversification, and maintaining a cash reserve.
  11. The Future of the 60/40 Portfolio:

    • The article discusses potential challenges to the 60/40 portfolio, such as higher inflation and the Federal Reserve's ability to control asset prices.
  12. Call to Action:

    • The article concludes by encouraging readers to consider alternatives and engage in a conversation with the authors or their team for personalized financial advice.

In summary, the article serves as a comprehensive guide for high net worth and ultra-high net worth investors, urging them to reconsider traditional investment strategies in light of changing economic conditions and advocating for a more tailored and proactive approach to financial planning.

Following the Herd Won’t Save You. 60-40 Stocks Not Enough (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Catherine Tremblay

Last Updated:

Views: 5936

Rating: 4.7 / 5 (47 voted)

Reviews: 86% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Catherine Tremblay

Birthday: 1999-09-23

Address: Suite 461 73643 Sherril Loaf, Dickinsonland, AZ 47941-2379

Phone: +2678139151039

Job: International Administration Supervisor

Hobby: Dowsing, Snowboarding, Rowing, Beekeeping, Calligraphy, Shooting, Air sports

Introduction: My name is Catherine Tremblay, I am a precious, perfect, tasty, enthusiastic, inexpensive, vast, kind person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.