Fiat vs. Representative Money: An Overview
Fiat money is physical money—paper or coins—while representative money is a check or other form of currency that can be exchanged for physical money in a stated amount.
Both fiat and representative money possess the value they claim to have. Fiat money is backed by the government that issues it. Representative money is backed by the issuer's assets or financial instruments. For example, a personal check is backed by the money in the issuer's bank account.
Without backing, either type of currency would be worthless.
Key Takeaways
- Fiat money is both physical money and legal tender and is backed by a nation's government.
- Representative money may be backed by a physical commodity such as precious metals, the cash in the issuer's account, or the credit extended through a credit card company.
- Fiat money can be used to buy goods and services because both parties involved in a transaction agree on the currency's value.
- Before 1971, the world's major currencies were representative and were backed by stores of gold.
- Fiat money is subject to the effects of trading, during which time it may gain or lose value in comparison to other currencies traded in the global markets.
- Fiat money also is vulnerable to inflation, which lowers its real buying power while its face value remains the same.
What Is Fiat Money?
Fiat money is declared legal tender by the government that issues it. This includes money in circulation such as paper money or coins. Fiat money is backed by a country's government rather than by a physical commodity or financial instrument.
Most coin and paper currencies that are used throughout the world are fiat money. This includes the U.S. dollar, the British pound, the Indian rupee, and the euro.
The value of fiat money is not determined by the material with which it is made. The metals used to mint coins and the paper used for bills are not valuable in themselves. The value of the money is determined by the government.
Fiat money became the norm after U.S. President Richard Nixon decided to abandon the gold standard in 1971. This meant that the U.S. dollar was no longer convertible into gold. The number of dollars printed was no longer directly tied to the amount of gold the government stored.
Inflation Risks of Fiat Money
Fiat money is at risk from inflation. As prices increase, a unit of currency buys less. If the government tries to compensate by printing too much money, the value of its currency drops further.
That was the case in Zimbabwe. Hyperinflation—extremely fast and out-of-control price increases—caused the currency to lose its value. The government began printing banknotes with higher values to keep up with inflation. The country's central bank finally had to stop printing money, causing the Zimbabwe dollar to lose value in the foreign currency market.
The country eventually turned to the U.S. dollar as its base currency.
What Is Representative Money?
Representative money is a portable currency that is backed by a physical commodity such as a bank deposit. Various forms of representative money are still in place, including checks and credit cards. These forms of payment are used today in place of paper money.
Representative money has a long history. Well into the 17th and 18th centuries, furs and other commodities that had recognized value could be used in lieu of cash in transactions. Precious metals like gold and silver were weighed and used as currency. The coins had actual value equal to the value that was stamped on them.
Until 1970, much of the world followed the gold standard. A country that followed the gold standard set a fixed price for gold, buying and selling it at that price. That fixed price was used to determine the value of the currency. So if Britain set theprice of goldat £500 an ounce, the value of the dollar would be 1/500th of an ounce of gold.
The major appeal of representative money was that it was not influenced by inflation. Governments were only able to print money up to the value of the gold they held in their vaults.
Key Differences
While fiat money doesn't have intrinsic value, its value is set by the government that issues the currency. Fiat money can be used to buy goods and services because both parties involved in a transaction agree on the currency's value.
Representative money, on the other hand, is valued based on the instrument backing it, whether that's a commodity, asset, or another financial instrument such as a check. Most currencies are no longer backed by commodities. But there are still other forms of representative money, such as checks, money orders, and bank drafts, that can be exchanged for the value listed on the instrument.
Special Considerations
The U.S. severed its ties with the gold standard in 1971, turning its currency into fiat money. As a result, all other national currencies came to be valued against the U.S. dollar. The money is not backed by gold. It has value because the U.S. government says it does.
If a government becomes unstable and inflation becomes a problem, the population may lose faith in the money it prints. The government may respond by printing too much paper money, which leads to hyperinflation. A dollar is no longer worth a dollar in gold.
What Advantages Does Fiat Money Have Over Representative Money?
Fiat money is issued by a country and backed by it. As such, it retains its value as long as the government and its economy remain stable.
Does Fiat Money Have Value?
Yes, fiat money has value. This is not determined by the worth of the material that is used to produce it, and it is not backed by a commodity of equal value. It has the value that the government says it has, whether that is a nickel or $100.
Why Is It Called Fiat Currency?
The term is derived from the Latin word fiat, which means a determination by an authority.
In this case, a government decrees the value of the currency, even though it isn't representative of another asset or financial instrument such as gold or a check.
Is Bitcoin a Fiat Currency?
Bitcoins and other cyber currencies are not backed by any government or other authority and are not fiat currencies. Their value is set by their investors.
They might be called representative currencies. Although they have no physical existence, they can be exchanged for other commodities and currencies.
The Bottom Line
Fiat money has been the dominant form of currency since the United States, and then the rest of the world, dropped the gold standard in the 1970s. That is, the cash has the value that a government attaches to it and does not represent a store of equal value, such as gold.
Representative money is a kind of IOU but it is backed by more than a promise to pay. It is backed by a deposit of cash or some other commodity that is stored by the payer and ready to be handed over to the payee.
I'm an expert well-versed in the intricacies of monetary systems, particularly the concepts of fiat and representative money. My expertise is derived from a deep understanding of economic principles, historical perspectives, and the evolution of currency systems.
The article "Fiat vs. Representative Money: An Overview" explores the fundamental distinctions between these two forms of currency. Fiat money, as the article delineates, is physical money declared legal tender by a government, backed by the issuing nation's authority. Representative money, on the other hand, takes various forms such as checks or credit cards and is backed by tangible assets or financial instruments held by the issuer.
The critical point highlighted is that both fiat and representative money derive their value from some form of backing. Fiat money finds its value in the government's decree and legal status, while representative money's value is tied to the assets or financial instruments supporting it.
The article delves into the historical context, noting that before 1971, major world currencies were representative and linked to stores of gold. The shift to fiat money gained momentum when U.S. President Richard Nixon abandoned the gold standard, decoupling the U.S. dollar from direct convertibility into gold.
In terms of risks, the article discusses inflation as a significant threat to fiat money. When governments print excessive amounts of money in response to rising prices, it can lead to a devaluation of the currency. The case of hyperinflation in Zimbabwe serves as a poignant example.
Representative money, historically linked to the gold standard, had the advantage of being immune to inflationary pressures. Governments could only print money up to the value of the gold held in their reserves, providing a fixed anchor for currency value.
The article succinctly outlines the key differences between fiat and representative money. While fiat money relies on government authority for value determination and can be used for transactions based on mutual agreement, representative money's value is tied to the backing instrument, such as a commodity or financial asset.
Special considerations are given to the U.S. severing ties with the gold standard in 1971, making its currency fiat. The stability of a government and its economy is highlighted as crucial for maintaining the value of fiat money. The article also addresses the term "fiat currency," derived from the Latin word "fiat," signifying a determination by an authority.
The article concludes by addressing the advantages of fiat money over representative money, emphasizing its stability as long as the issuing government and economy remain sound. It also touches upon the intrinsic value of fiat money, determined by government decree rather than the material used in its production.
Finally, the article briefly touches on Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, categorizing them as non-fiat currencies. Unlike fiat currencies, these digital currencies lack government backing and derive their value from investor sentiment.
In summary, the article provides a comprehensive overview of the concepts of fiat and representative money, covering historical contexts, risks, key differences, and the evolution of monetary systems.
