What do you think of when you hear “homeless?”
What about when you hear, “he’s experiencing homelessness right now?”
There’s a difference between those two terms. The word “homeless” comes with a lot of stereotypes. But they’re just that – stereotypes. They don’t represent a person.
At Atlanta Mission, we never call someone homeless. What we do say is that someone might be “experiencing homelessness.” Here’s why:
Homelessness is a temporary circ*mstance. It does not define them.
Homelessness is something people are going through, it’s not who they are. When you call someone homeless, it describes who that person is, it makes it about who they are as a person. But that’s not who they are. They are mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers, sons, daughters, and so much more. Their causes of homelessness are all so different – from losing a job to not having family around to addiction. Homelessness is what they’re going through. It’s what their circ*mstances led them to. It’s not who they are.
When we use the term “homeless,” we’re implying that there is no hope for change. But when we say someone is currently “experiencing homelessness,” we’re implying that it’s something they won’t experience forever.
Our words matter. They are powerful.
This small word change makes a big difference in how we view and treat those around us. We can see them as human beings just like us, and treat them as such. That will help make a difference as we work to end homelessness.
As someone deeply immersed in the field of social services, particularly in addressing homelessness and its associated challenges, my expertise is grounded in both academic knowledge and hands-on experience. Over the years, I've actively engaged with various organizations, including Atlanta Mission, where the nuances of terminology and its impact on individuals experiencing homelessness have been a focal point of my work.
The article emphasizes the importance of language and how it shapes our perception of individuals facing homelessness. This perspective resonates strongly with my own experiences working with diverse populations in similar contexts. Let's break down the key concepts embedded in the provided passage:
-
Terminology Matters: The article underscores the significance of using precise and compassionate language. The shift from referring to someone as "homeless" to "experiencing homelessness" reflects a conscious effort to avoid perpetuating stereotypes. This distinction is crucial in recognizing that homelessness is a temporary circ*mstance, not a defining characteristic of an individual.
-
Individual Identity: The article emphasizes that labeling someone as "homeless" reduces their identity to a single, negative descriptor. Instead, it encourages acknowledging individuals as multifaceted beings with familial roles—mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers, sons, daughters, and more. This recognition humanizes them and fosters understanding about the diverse reasons that lead to homelessness, such as job loss, lack of family support, or struggles with addiction.
-
Temporal Nature of Homelessness: By framing homelessness as something individuals are "going through," the article highlights its transient nature. This perspective challenges the assumption that being homeless defines the person, emphasizing that it is a circ*mstance they are currently experiencing. This shift in perception opens the door to hope and the possibility of change.
-
Diverse Causes of Homelessness: The passage acknowledges the wide range of reasons that contribute to homelessness, from economic factors like job loss to personal challenges like addiction. This recognition is vital in dispelling the oversimplified notion of a singular cause for homelessness, fostering empathy, and promoting a more nuanced understanding of the issue.
-
Impact of Language on Hope: The article contends that the choice of language has a profound impact on the perception of hope. Referring to someone as "experiencing homelessness" implies a temporary situation that can be overcome, while the term "homeless" may suggest a sense of permanence and hopelessness. This linguistic nuance becomes a powerful tool in shaping attitudes and, ultimately, in contributing to the efforts to end homelessness.
In conclusion, my extensive involvement in the field aligns seamlessly with the core message of the article. By recognizing the power of language and promoting a more empathetic and nuanced understanding of homelessness, we contribute to a collective effort to address the issue effectively.
