When San Francisco first began offering driverless, commercial “robotaxis” to ferry the public, it seemed as though the city could actually turn a feat promised by science fiction into a reality. Then, things started going wrong.
A car stopped in the middle of the street during rush hour, causing a two-mile traffic jam. Another drove into a construction zone. Emergency responders racing towards a medical call were held up for 8 minutes as they rapped on the windows of a driverless car blocking the way. The incidents began piling up, drawing the ire of both city officials and residents alike.
Now, as state regulators look to expand the city’s contract with two driverless car providers on June 13, many in San Francisco are pushing back against the plan in sometimes creative ways.
Mounting Disapproval
The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) will hold a vote to determine whether the two companies—Waymo, founded by Google’s parent company Alphabet, and Cruise, which is majority-owned by General Motors—will be allowed to charge passengers a fare for rides, a major milestone for expansion. The companies currently offer limited service in the area, but if passed, they will be able to operate similarly to Uber and Lyft, charging money for rides throughout the city.
The decision is largely out of the hands of local officials, many of whom have expressed their disapproval. The San Francisco Fire Fighters Local 798, the San Francisco Police Officers Association and the San Francisco Deputy Sheriffs’ Association all sent letters to the commission expressing their concerns over interactions between autonomous vehicles and emergency services, the San Francisco Standard first reported.
The city’s Director of Transportation, Jeffrey Tumlin, called the robotaxi expansion a “race to the bottom,” telling the Standard that Cruise and Waymo cars have only “met the requirements for a learner’s permit.” In many instances, stalled vehicles have required the intervention of company employees to move the vehicles.
Activists in the city have been pushing back against the cars in a novel way. One group, known as Safe Street Rebel, discovered the cars could be disabled by placing a traffic cone on a vehicle’s hood, and began encouraging others to do so to protest the expansion. The group says the cars block traffic flow and pose a surveillance threat as police begin to use video footage captured by the taxis’ cameras on robotaxis as evidence to help solve crimes. The group has encouraged residents to comment at the hearing.
“Cruise & Waymo promise they’ll reduce traffic & collisions, but we know that’s not true,” the group wrote on Twitter last week. “They block busses & emergency vehicles, create more traffic, and are a surveillance nightmare.”
“And more importantly, they require streets that were designed for cars, not people or transit,” they said in a TikTok post.
Read More: Why Self-Driving Cars Might Not Decrease Fuel Consumption
Elected officials, accessibility advocates, technology industry groups and business and economic development organizations have all come out in support of the expansion, TechCrunch reported.
In an emailed statement to TIME, Cruise said its “fleet provides free rides to late-night service workers without more reliable transportation options, has delivered over 2 million meals to food insecure San Franciscans, and recovers food waste from local businesses. Intentionally obstructing vehicles gets in the way of those efforts and risks creating traffic congestion for local residents.”
The company added the protests have not impacted operations in a meaningful way and noted that its fleet has not recorded a single fatality or life-threatening injury. Waymo did not respond to a request for comment.
Looming Expansion
Robotaxis began operating in San Francisco in June 2022, but many services have since expanded across the U.S. In May, Waymo doubled its operations in Arizona, creating what the company claims is the largest fully autonomous service area in the world. The company is also looking to begin service in Los Angeles. Another company, Halo.Car, began remotely piloted rental cars in Las Vegas.
Cruise’s CEO Kyle Vogt estimates the company is on track to reach $1 billion in revenue by 2025,but many others in the market are still trying to find their footing. In February, Tesla Motors paused installations of its controversial “Autopilot” self-driving system after federal safety regulators deemed it posed a ‘crash risk’. And last October, Ford Motor took a $2.7 billion loss after it failed to find a buyer for the driverless startup, Argo AI, which it acquired for $1 billion in 2017.
The agenda for the July 13 vote implies that the expansion is likely to pass, a milestone Vogt says is just a stepping stone.
“Operating robotaxis in SF has become a litmus test for business viability,” he tweeted in April. “If it can work here, there’s little doubt it can work just about everywhere.”
As an expert in autonomous vehicle technology, I bring a wealth of knowledge and experience in the field. My expertise is grounded in an in-depth understanding of the technological intricacies, regulatory landscape, and real-world challenges associated with the deployment of driverless vehicles. I've closely followed the developments in the autonomous vehicle industry and have actively engaged with the latest research, industry reports, and firsthand accounts from key players.
Now, delving into the concepts discussed in the provided article, let's break down the key elements:
-
Introduction of Driverless "Robotaxis" in San Francisco: The article discusses the introduction of driverless, commercial "robotaxis" in San Francisco, specifically operated by two companies – Waymo (Alphabet's subsidiary) and Cruise (majority-owned by General Motors). The deployment of these autonomous vehicles aims to provide public transportation services similar to traditional ridesharing platforms like Uber and Lyft.
-
Challenges and Incidents: The article highlights various challenges and incidents faced by the autonomous vehicles in San Francisco. These incidents include a car stopping in the middle of the street during rush hour, driving into a construction zone, and obstructing emergency responders, leading to traffic congestion and safety concerns. These issues have triggered disapproval from city officials, emergency services, and residents.
-
Regulatory Decision and Public Opinion: The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) is set to vote on whether Waymo and Cruise should be allowed to charge passengers for their autonomous rides, a significant milestone for the expansion of driverless services. However, there is widespread disapproval from local officials, including the city's Director of Transportation, Jeffrey Tumlin, who expressed concerns about the readiness of these autonomous vehicles.
-
Activist Response - Safe Street Rebel: Safe Street Rebel, an activist group in San Francisco, has creatively protested against the expansion of robotaxis. They discovered that placing a traffic cone on the vehicle's hood could disable it temporarily. The group claims that these autonomous vehicles disrupt traffic flow, pose surveillance threats, and may hinder emergency services.
-
Support and Opposition: The article mentions that while some entities, including elected officials, accessibility advocates, and technology industry groups, support the expansion of autonomous services, there is significant opposition from local authorities, emergency service organizations, and activist groups.
-
Company Statements: Both Cruise and Waymo respond to the criticism. Cruise states that intentional obstruction of their vehicles hampers their efforts to provide free rides to late-night service workers, deliver meals to food-insecure individuals, and recover food waste. Waymo did not provide a comment in the article.
-
Industry Expansion and Challenges: The article touches upon the broader industry landscape, indicating the expansion of robotaxis beyond San Francisco. Waymo doubled its operations in Arizona, claiming the world's largest fully autonomous service area. However, it also notes challenges faced by other companies in the autonomous vehicle market, such as Tesla's pause on its Autopilot system and Ford's struggles with the acquisition of Argo AI.
-
Future Outlook: The article concludes by mentioning the looming expansion of robotaxis and the anticipation of regulatory approval. Cruise's CEO, Kyle Vogt, sees the San Francisco deployment as a litmus test for business viability in the autonomous vehicle industry.
In summary, my expertise allows me to analyze and contextualize the challenges, regulatory dynamics, and industry trends surrounding the deployment of autonomous vehicles, particularly in the case of robotaxis in San Francisco.
