DURHAM, N.C. – Earth is awash in plastic. It litters our landscapes and waterways, overflows landfills and increasingly threatens human and environmental health worldwide.
And because most plastic is made from fossil fuels, it also contributes to climate change.
Many companies, mindful of growing public expectations about corporate responsibility, have pledged to reduce their plastic footprints.
However, a new analysis by Duke University researchers finds that while 72% of the top 300 companies on the Fortune Global 500 list have made some form of voluntary commitment to reduce plastic pollution, few have prioritized reducing their use of virgin plastic, which is the real root of the problem, according to Zoie Diana, a PhD candidate at Duke’s Nicholas School of the Environment.
“We found that rather than shutting off the plastic tap at its source, companies are overwhelmingly focused on downstream waste-reduction strategies such as including more recycled or potentially recyclable plastic in their products and marginally reducing the volume of plastic used in their packaging, a practice known as lightweighting,” said Diana, who led the research.
These sound like good approaches, and they are up to a point, she said. “But if a company reinvests its savings from lightweighting into new products that also use plastic, or if it ends up making more bags, bottles and containers overall -- even if they are individually lighter and less plastic-intensive, it’s not going to result in a net reduction of plastic pollution.”
The Duke researchers published their peer-reviewed study Nov. 18 in the journal One Earth. As part of their analysis, they reviewed the annual reports of nearly 1,000 of the world’s largest and most powerful companies.
Between 1950 and 2017, global plastics production increased 174-fold and it’s projected to double again by 2040, she noted. About 79% of the plastic waste generated by this production ends up in landfills or the environment. Only 9% is ever recycled and only one-tenth of that amount has been recycled more than once over the last 50 years.
“Very little of the plastic we put in the recycling bin actually ends up being reused,” Diana said. “Recycling just delays plastic disposal and pollution. Any comprehensive solution needs to target virgin plastic production and use.”
The vague wording used to describe some of the pollution-reducing commitments was also a red flag.
“Three-quarters of the world’s 300 largest companies made at least one commitment that was neither time-bound nor measurable,” Diana said. “There were no timelines, no deadlines, no quantifiable ways of assessing if progress was being made.”
There was also little recognition of the link between plastic production and climate change.
“The majority of companies made no connection in publicly available reports between reducing their carbon footprint and reducing their plastic footprint, particularly in terms of reducing the production and use of virgin plastic,” Diana said.
The United Nations Environment Assembly is working to have an international plastics treaty in place in 2024, which Diana hopes will target virgin plastic. She believes continued scientific scrutiny of the plastic footprints of major corporations is also necessary.
“Scientists have an important role in monitoring and defining environmental issues, which may aid in holding companies accountable,” she said.
Diana’s coauthors were Kelly Reilly, Rachel Karasik, Tibor Vegh, Amy Pickle and John Virdin of Duke’s Nicholas Institute for Energy, Environment & Sustainability; Yifan Wang, Zoe Wang, Lauren Dunn, Meagan Dunphy-Daly and Daniel Rittschof of Duke’s Nicholas School; Robert Blasiak of the Stockholm Resilience Center; and Daniel Vermeer of Duke’s Fuqua School of Business.
Funding came from the Pew Charitable Trusts, the Oak Foundation and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, which is part of the National Institutes of Health.
Many of the paper’s authors are members of the Duke UniversityPlastic Pollution Working Group, which leverages the expertise of 46 researchers and students from 12 fields -- including environmental toxicology, business, medicine, public policy, bioinformatics, marine conservation, history, engineering and chemistry -- to find innovative solutions to plastic pollution.
CITATION: “Voluntary Commitments Made by the World’s Largest Companies Focus on General Plastic and Recycling Over Other Actions to Address the Plastics Crisis,” Zoie Diana, Kelly Reilly, Rachel Karasik, Tibor Vegh, Yifan Wng, Zoe Wang, Lauren Dunn, Robert Blasiak, Meagan M. Dunphy-Daly, Daniel Rittschof, Daniel Vermeer, Amy Pickle and John Virdin. One Earth, Nov. 18, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.oneear.2022.10.008
###
The Duke Climate Commitment: Duke is uniting the university’s education, research, operations and public service missions to engage our entire community in the relentless pursuit of climate change solutions. Learn more
As an expert in environmental science and sustainability, my comprehensive knowledge in the field enables me to provide insights into the critical issue of plastic pollution, especially as highlighted in the recent analysis by Duke University researchers.
The article underscores the pervasive problem of plastic pollution, emphasizing its impact on landscapes, waterways, landfills, and the broader environment, while also linking it to climate change due to the reliance on fossil fuels in plastic production. My expertise allows me to corroborate these claims with the understanding that plastics, derived from fossil fuels, contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions and exacerbate climate change.
The research, led by Zoie Diana, a PhD candidate at Duke’s Nicholas School of the Environment, reveals that despite corporate commitments to reduce plastic pollution, there's a substantial gap in addressing the root cause: the use of virgin plastic. I can validate the significance of this finding, as virgin plastic production is a major contributor to the environmental crisis, with downstream waste-reduction strategies often falling short of achieving a net reduction in plastic pollution.
The study highlights the insufficient focus on reducing virgin plastic use by major corporations, with many prioritizing strategies like lightweighting and incorporating recycled plastic into products. Drawing on my expertise, I can explain that while these approaches are commendable, they may not lead to a substantial reduction if companies reinvest their savings into new plastic-intensive products. This aligns with the argument made by Diana, emphasizing the need to address virgin plastic production directly.
Furthermore, the article brings attention to the alarming increase in global plastics production, underlining the urgency of tackling this issue. My expertise allows me to contextualize the data presented, showing that the rapid growth in plastics production, coupled with low recycling rates, poses a significant threat to the environment.
The article also touches on the upcoming international plastics treaty proposed by the United Nations Environment Assembly in 2024. Leveraging my knowledge, I can elaborate on the potential impact of such a treaty, emphasizing the importance of targeting virgin plastic production for a comprehensive solution.
In conclusion, my in-depth understanding of environmental science and sustainability supports the critical analysis presented in the article, highlighting the urgency of addressing virgin plastic production as a key strategy in mitigating plastic pollution and its associated environmental and climate impacts.
