A contract of good faith refers to the implied agreement that both parties will act in good faith and not stand in the way of the other party's performance.3 min read
A contract of good faith refers to the implied agreement that both parties will act in good faith and not stand in the way of the other party's performance.
What Is Good Faith?
Good faith is an implied (unstated) condition of every contract. It's assumed that parties won't do anything to deliberately hinder the contract's completion. If a party fails to act in good faith, it may breach the contract and be held liable for resulting damages.
Good faith is necessary in a variety of situations, such as the following:
- Contracts
- Mediation
- Business dealings
- Arbitration
- Settlement negotiations
Typically, good faith means acting with honesty in conduct or transaction. Basically, someone agrees not to lie, cheat, or steal. Business owners who deal in merchandise should be honest and deal fairly with others.
However, good faith in the contract sense doesn't mean a failure to act with fairness, decency, or reasonableness. Instead, it has to do with what the parties have agreed to, along with having reasonable expectations of the other party.
Standards of Good Faith
Although the term “good faith” means specific things in a certain situation, most courts determine whether a person acted in good or bad faith based on one of two separate standards.
The first standard for determining good faith is based on reasonableness. When someone refuses to uphold his end of an agreement for no reason at all or a reason that has almost nothing to do with the situation, he may be liable for bad-faith dealing. For example, a car accident injures a plaintiff. He files a claim with his car insurance company to cover medical bills for accident injuries. However, the company does not pay him the benefits it owes him. Instead, it refuses to send him a check, and when he calls about payment, the agency doesn't take his calls.
A court may find the insurance company is not acting in good faith in this case since the company's actions are not reasonable. The insurance company refused to pay the benefits it owed, and it wouldn't give a satisfactory reason (or any reason at all) for not paying.
The second standard uses reasonableness to see if good faith exists, but it also considers intent. Using intent, someone may be liable for acting in bad faith if he didn't act reasonably and knew he had no reasonable basis to act the way he did.
Using the above example, the insurance company did not act in good faith since it didn't pay the benefits it owed and didn't explain why. Under the intent standard, the company is only liable for acting in bad faith if it also knew there was no reasonable basis for refusing to pay the claims.
Good Faith and Fair Dealing
Say you're a franchisee as part of a large chain. You pay a monthly franchise fee as part of your franchise agreement. In order to make enough money to pay your fee, you ask your franchisor for marketing help or to reach out to your potential investors. However, the franchisor refuses to provide assistance, and you're not able to pay your franchise fee. In this instance, the franchisor could be liable for breaching the duty of good faith and fair dealing, although you didn't perform your part.
There's an implied duty of good faith and fair dealing regarding performance and enforcement in contracts. However, many companies, executives, and attorneys fail to realize that this duty may require parties not to interfere with or refuse to cooperate in the performance of the other party. This is crucial since a contract may not explicitly require cooperation or a lack of interference. Just the implication may require a party to adhere to this duty or risk breaching the contract. This duty requires that neither side destroys the other party's right to receive benefits under the contract.
Good faith has different meanings, depending on the situation. Although it's not expressly stated in a contract, it is expected that all parties act in good faith. Otherwise, one side may be held responsible for bad faith dealings, which could result in costly consequences.
If you need help with a contract of good faith, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.
I'm quite familiar with the concepts discussed in that article. Good faith is a fundamental aspect of contract law, implying an unwritten commitment between parties to act honestly and fairly in their dealings. Evidence supporting this isn't just theoretical but rooted in legal precedent and case law.
Firstly, the principle of good faith is deeply entrenched in legal systems worldwide. Courts across various jurisdictions have consistently recognized and enforced this principle. It's not merely a moral expectation but a legally binding obligation that underpins contractual relationships.
Regarding the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing, numerous cases have been litigated where parties were held accountable for failing to uphold this obligation. These cases often revolve around scenarios where one party deliberately obstructs or refuses to cooperate, causing detriment to the other party's ability to fulfill their contractual obligations.
The article rightly points out two standards for evaluating good faith: one based on reasonableness and the other considering intent. Courts use these standards to assess whether a party's actions align with the obligation of good faith, emphasizing not just the reasonableness of actions but also the underlying intentions.
Moreover, good faith isn't limited to specific contract clauses explicitly mentioning it. Its implicit nature means that parties are expected to adhere to this principle in all facets of contractual performance, negotiation, and enforcement. Failure to do so can lead to significant legal repercussions, including being held liable for damages resulting from a breach of good faith.
In essence, the duty of good faith isn't just a theoretical concept but a crucial aspect of contract law backed by legal precedents, making it imperative for parties to understand and comply with this obligation to avoid legal consequences.
The article provides a comprehensive overview of how good faith operates within contracts, emphasizing its importance in various scenarios, from business dealings to settlement negotiations. It also highlights the consequences of breaching the duty of good faith, which can indeed lead to costly outcomes, as legal disputes arising from breaches of good faith often result in financial liabilities.
If you're seeking legal guidance regarding contracts involving good faith, platforms like UpCounsel can connect you with top-tier lawyers well-versed in contract law, ensuring that your contractual agreements align with legal standards and safeguard your interests.
