China is in default on a trillion dollars in debt to US bondholders. Will the US force repayment? (2024)

Every country should pay its sovereign debt. Default, we are told, is not an option. But has anyone told China?

The United States pays interest on approximately $850 billion in debt held by the People’s Republic of China. China, however, is currently in default on its sovereign debt held by American bondholders.

Successive U.S. administrations have chosen to sidestep this fact, allowing business and trade with China to proceed as normal. Now that the relationship with China has soured and the People’s Republic of China has become the greatest adversarial threat to the U.S. and Western security, policymakers should revisit this appalling failure of justice.

ALSO IN OPINION: HOW ONE U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY IS HELPING CHINA WIN THE TECH RACE

Some history is in order. Before 1949, the government of the Republic of China (ROC) issued a large volume of long-term sovereign gold-denominated bonds, secured by Chinese tax revenues, to private investors and governments for the construction of infrastructure and financing of governmental activities. Put simply, the China we know today would not have been possible absent these bond offerings.

In 1938, during its conflict with Japan, the ROC defaulted on its sovereign debt. After the military victory of the communists, the ROC government fled to Taiwan. The People’s Republic of China was eventually recognized internationally as the successor government of China. Under well-established international law, the “successor government” doctrine holds that the current government of China, led by the Chinese Communist Party, is responsible for repayment of the defaulted bonds.

A private group of American citizens holds a large quantity of these gold-denominated bonds. This citizen-led group, the American Bondholders Foundation (ABF), serves as trustee with power of attorney for some 20,000 bondholders, whose bonds are valued at well more than $1 trillion.

Then-U.K. Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher’s tough negotiation stance on the return of Hong Kong to China led to a British settlement agreement on these same Chinese bonds in 1987. Thatcher said that for China to have access to U.K. capital markets, it had to honor the defaulted Chinese sovereign debt held by British subjects. Faced with that stark choice, China agreed.

Unfortunately, the U.S. failed to take such a common-sense stance. To this day, China has had access to U.S. capital markets while openly rejecting its sovereign debt obligations to American bondholders.

Lest anyone wonder about the age of these bonds, it is irrelevant. What matters is that this is a sovereign obligation. As recently as 2010, the German government made its last payment for reparations from World War I. In 2015 Great Britain made payments on bonds issuances that dated from the 18thcentury.

The Biden administration and the U.S. Congress have a unique opportunity to enforce the well-established international rule that governments must honor their debts. Like the U.K. did in 1987, the U.S. must view the repayment of China’s sovereign debt as essential to its national security interests. In doing so, the U.S. government should undertake one or both of two actions currently being discussed by members of Congress.

The first would be to acquire the Chinese bonds held by the ABF and utilize them to offset (partially or in whole) the $850 billion-plus of U.S. Treasurys owned by China (reducing up to $95 million indailyinterest paid to China). This would lower the national debt and put the U.S. in a better financial position globally.

The second would be to pass legislation that requires China to abide by international norms and rules of finance, trade and commerce. This would include abiding by the transparency rules of capital markets and exchanges and ending its practices of exclusionary settlement, discriminatory payments, selective default, and rejection of the successor government doctrine of settled international law. If China fails to meet those obligations, it would be barred, together with its state-controlled entities, from access to all U.S. dollar-denominated bond markets and exchanges.

This, again, is just common sense and would be the very thing the Chinese government would do if the situation were reversed.

Over the last two decades, there has been recurrent bipartisan support in Congress for bondholders to address China’s default with several congressional resolutions. Despite this, successive U.S. administrations have been silent on this issue, choosing to kick this can down the road, assuming that China would eventually liberalize and embrace Western norms and values.

China is in default on a trillion dollars in debt to US bondholders. Will the US force repayment? (1)

This failure to act needs to end now.

Given that relations with China have deteriorated and there is bipartisan agreement on the threat from China, this matter can finally be acted upon by both Congress and the Biden administration. Getting settlement on this defaulted debt is not only right and just for the bondholders but, if done correctly, could also be a huge win for the U.S. taxpayer.

AndrewHaleis the Jay Van Andel Senior Policy Analyst in Trade Policy at The Heritage Foundation.

Copyright 2023 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

As an expert in international finance and sovereign debt, I find the topic of countries meeting their obligations particularly intriguing. I've delved into the intricate world of sovereign bonds, international law regarding defaulted debt, and the historical context that shapes such financial obligations. Now, let's analyze the key concepts used in the article:

  1. Sovereign Debt and Default: Sovereign debt refers to the money a government owes to external creditors. Default occurs when a government fails to meet its debt obligations. The article discusses China's default on sovereign debt issued by the Republic of China (ROC) before 1949 and how, under international law, the successor government (People's Republic of China) is responsible for repayment.

  2. American Bondholders Foundation (ABF): The ABF is a private group representing American citizens holding gold-denominated bonds issued by the ROC. This group, acting as a trustee with power of attorney for around 20,000 bondholders, seeks the repayment of defaulted Chinese sovereign debt valued at over $1 trillion.

  3. Historical Context: The article provides historical context, highlighting events such as the ROC's default during the conflict with Japan in 1938. It emphasizes the role of these bonds in financing infrastructure and governmental activities, shaping the China we know today.

  4. International Precedent - UK and China: The article draws a comparison between the UK's stance in 1987 and the current situation in the United States. Margaret Thatcher's negotiation with China, linking access to UK capital markets to honoring defaulted Chinese sovereign debt, is presented as a successful precedent.

  5. Biden Administration's Opportunity: The article argues that the Biden administration and the U.S. Congress have a unique opportunity to enforce international rules on debt repayment. It suggests two potential actions: acquiring Chinese bonds held by the ABF to offset U.S. Treasuries owned by China and passing legislation to compel China to abide by international financial norms.

  6. National Security Implications: The article underscores the national security aspect, contending that the repayment of China's sovereign debt is essential to U.S. national security interests. It suggests that the U.S. should take actions similar to the UK in 1987, aligning debt repayment with national security concerns.

  7. Bipartisan Support and U.S. Policy Inaction: Despite recurrent bipartisan support in Congress for addressing China's default over the last two decades, the article criticizes successive U.S. administrations for their inaction, attributing it to an assumption that China would eventually embrace Western norms.

  8. Proposed Actions: The article proposes two specific actions for the U.S.: acquiring Chinese bonds held by the ABF to offset U.S. Treasuries and passing legislation requiring China to abide by international financial norms, with potential consequences for non-compliance.

  9. Financial Implications: The article suggests that taking corrective action could not only address the historical injustice for bondholders but also positively impact the U.S. financially by reducing the national debt and improving its global financial position.

In conclusion, the article provides a comprehensive overview of the historical, legal, and financial dimensions of China's default on sovereign debt, advocating for the U.S. to address this issue for national security and financial reasons.

China is in default on a trillion dollars in debt to US bondholders. Will the US force repayment? (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Aracelis Kilback

Last Updated:

Views: 6427

Rating: 4.3 / 5 (64 voted)

Reviews: 95% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Aracelis Kilback

Birthday: 1994-11-22

Address: Apt. 895 30151 Green Plain, Lake Mariela, RI 98141

Phone: +5992291857476

Job: Legal Officer

Hobby: LARPing, role-playing games, Slacklining, Reading, Inline skating, Brazilian jiu-jitsu, Dance

Introduction: My name is Aracelis Kilback, I am a nice, gentle, agreeable, joyous, attractive, combative, gifted person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.