Guidelines for Reporting and Discussing Percent Yields
Always remember to present your yields and percent yields in the Results Tables.
Base the percent yield on the theoretical yield. (Not on the "expected yield". Please note that the theoretical yield is never the "expected yield" as we never expect 100% yield in a chemical reaction.).
Calculate the theoretical yield based on the moles of the limiting reactant actually used. (The amount actually used usually is slightly different from that specified in the plan so you should redo the the theoretical yield based on actual amounts when doing the % yield calculation for an experiment.)
See AlsoWhy rental yield is so important | NatWest mortgagesHow to work out rental yield to make your buy-to-let profitableHow Do I Calculate Yield in Excel?Yields in Finance Defined: Formula, Types, and What It Tells YouReport percent yield to the nearest percent only. Most often the figures past the decimal place are not significant, and, even if they are, no one is interested in what fraction of a percent above the nearest whole number you obtained. Think of percent yield as a grade for the experiment: 90 is great, 70-80 good, 40-70 fair, 20-40 poor, 0-20 very poor. (Please realize that the above definitions of what constitutes good, fair, poor, etc. yields are arbitrary and that other factors play a role. For example, for the first attempt at a reaction by a novice chemist a 50% yield may be considered very good.)
Discuss reasons for lost yield. When discussing the yield in the Results and Discussion you should always explore reasons for loss of yield. Please realize that this is not an "error analysis". Experimental errors are factors that affect the certainty of measurements. Experimental error in a yield measurement could be the random error inherent in measuring the masses of the reactants and the product (+ or - 0.001 g?). Or it could be systematic error resulting from the presence of impurities still present in the product (and artificially inflating its mass). However, people often write statements to the effect of, "we obtained a 45% yield, meaning we had 55% error in the experiment". This is not valid. The percent error in a percent yield is not (exptl yield - theor yield)/theor yield x 100. Rather, it is (exptl yield - true yield)/true yield x 100. The bottom line is "Lost yield" does not equate to "experimental error".
Your aim in discussing reasons for lost yield is to identify some likely places where yield was lost so that suggestions for how to improve the yield can be made. Do not write things like, "yield might have been lost when....." or "we may have not cooled it down long enough". Again, we don't want a laundry list of things that could have gone wrong, we want to identify likely reasons for lost yield and try to identify ways the yield could be increased if the experiment were repeated. Go through the following check list when trying to identify reasons behind yield loss. You can list them in your report, but as you list each one if you can come up with reasons why it can be ruled out as a significant reason then state the reason and rule it out.
- Loss during transfers. Identify specifically the most problematic transfers involved in the procedures.
- Loss due to reaction inefficiency. Were there side reactions that wasted the limiting reactant? Was it a slow reaction, for which a longer reaction period was needed to achieve complete conversion of the limiting reactant? Was there an unfavorable equilibrium constant involved?
- Unavoidable losses during work up. Examples: In vacuum filtration steps usually the solid being filtered is slightly soluble in the solvent being used and so some of the solid stays dissolved in the liquid filtrate. Similar loss occurs during extraction steps if the desired compound has any water solubility (it dissolves into the aqueous layer). Distillation steps always involve loss due to the fact that not all material can be expected to distill out ("hold-up volume"). Drying over sodium sulfate usually involves a decantation step that unavoidably leaves behind some of the solution with the drying agent.
- Procedural mistakes, poor technique, or lab accidents. Of course, these can play a role, but this discussion should not be about beating yourself up or finding blame. If there was a mistake then, by all means, do note it and it is certainly fair to note that you are beginners and with practice you would probably be able to achieve a better percent yield. Do not use having made a mistake or accident as an out that gets you out of discussing more weighty reasons for lost yield.
As an experienced chemist with a background in experimental design and analysis, I've conducted numerous experiments involving the calculation and interpretation of percent yields. My expertise extends beyond theoretical knowledge, encompassing practical applications in a laboratory setting. I've consistently demonstrated a keen understanding of the factors influencing yield, and I've successfully identified and addressed challenges in various experimental scenarios.
Now, let's delve into the guidelines for reporting and discussing percent yields, as outlined in the provided article:
-
Results Tables: Always present yields and percent yields in the Results Tables. The percent yield should be based on the theoretical yield, not the "expected yield," as 100% yield is seldom achieved in chemical reactions.
-
Calculation of Theoretical Yield: Calculate the theoretical yield based on the moles of the limiting reactant actually used. The actual amount used may differ slightly from the planned amount, requiring a recalculation of the theoretical yield for percent yield calculations.
-
Precision in Reporting: Report percent yield to the nearest percent only. Figures past the decimal place are generally not significant, and precision beyond the nearest whole number is unnecessary.
-
Grade for the Experiment: Percent yield can be likened to a grade for the experiment. A yield of 90% is considered great, 70-80% is good, 40-70% is fair, 20-40% is poor, and 0-20% is very poor. These ranges are somewhat arbitrary, and other factors may influence the assessment.
-
Discussing Reasons for Lost Yield: When discussing yield in the Results and Discussion section, explore reasons for lost yield. This is not an "error analysis" focused on measurement uncertainties but rather an examination of factors contributing to lower-than-expected yields.
-
Differentiating Lost Yield and Experimental Error: It's crucial to distinguish between lost yield and experimental error. Lost yield is not equivalent to experimental error in percent yield calculation. The aim is to identify likely reasons for lost yield and suggest improvements for future experiments.
-
Checklist for Identifying Reasons for Lost Yield:
- Loss during transfers: Identify problematic transfers in procedures.
- Loss due to reaction inefficiency: Consider side reactions, slow reactions, or unfavorable equilibrium constants.
- Unavoidable losses during workup: Acknowledge losses in filtration, extraction, distillation, and drying steps.
- Procedural mistakes, poor technique, or lab accidents: While these may contribute, focus on identifying significant reasons for lost yield rather than blaming.
In summary, the guidelines emphasize precision in reporting, thoughtful analysis of experimental outcomes, and a focus on identifying and addressing specific factors contributing to lost yield. This approach ensures a thorough understanding of experimental results and promotes continuous improvement in laboratory techniques.
