| Written by Altlaw
With the world sending18.7 billion texts every day, it’s no surprise that SMS messages play such a key role in many modern cases. Many assume their text messages are private and can reveal anything without repercussion, but this isn’t always the case. Police authorities can request warrants to search messages on a phone and legal professionals can present relevant texts as legal evidence in court. However, text messages aren’t always useable in the courtroom. This blog post will look into when messages can be used as evidence, alongside famous examples of texts swaying a courtroom decision. Text messages have been around for a while, with thefirst text senton 3rd December 1992. At first, texts had a 160-character limit, but they can now include emojis, videos, pictures, GIFs and more. Due to the popularity of SMS messaging, many cases have been decided on texts provided in the courtroom. Once a text message has been sent, it can swing a case. Text messages can often show motives to commit a crime or a person’s state of mind during the time of an alleged offence. However, although text messages can be used in court as legal evidence, they aren’t automatically admissible. And it isn't just text messages lawyers have to deal with. Social media posts and other forms of digital communication can be used as evidence in court to decide the fate of a trial. Text messages — among other forms of electronically stored information (ESI) — must be legally obtained and properly preserved as evidence, or a court won't pass them as authentic. Texts must be presented in a format that shows more than just the sender or receiver’s name, with information proving their relevance. For example, the phone number that has sent the messages. A court order can be obtained if a person doesn’t voluntarily provide their phone. There are also instances when text messages may have been deleted to cover up evidence. In these circ*mstances, texts can still be obtained from the receiver’s phone or from the phone’s service provider for a limited time. Many famous cases involving celebrities have included text messages used as legal evidence in a court of law. Text messages have been used as legal evidence in many prominent cases, just as they are in ordinary cases around the world on a daily basis. In the trial between Johnny Depp and Amber Heard, Heard’s lawyers presented a series of graphic texts as they cross-examined Depp. They showed the court several graphic text messages between Depp and British actor Paul Bettany, in which they spoke of ‘burning’ and ‘drowning’ Heard.The ever-growing landscape of digital evidence
When can text messages be used in court?
Examples of text messages being used in courtDepp v Heard
In a statement, Depp said the texts were about a Monty Python scene, which he claimed to have testified to be one of his favourite films.
After the texts were shown, Sky News reported that there was a ‘definite shift in mood’ compared to the previous day.
'Deflategate' in the NFL
Texts have also been used in professional sports amid allegations of cheating in the NFL. A series of texts were revealed between staff of the NFL’s New England Patriots, which suggested the team may be cheating to win games.
An article fromSports Illustratedsaid, “New England Patriots personnel likely manipulated the air pressure of the footballs in their game against the Indianapolis Colts” to win the game.
Information about this scandal came to fruition from a series of text messages in which Jim McNally, the Patriots locker room attendant, named himself as ‘the deflator.’
The texts were used as crucial forms of evidence in the investigation against the Patriots. Quarterback Tom Brady claimed he had destroyed the phone that was allegedly part of the scandal and, as a result, was suspended for four games by the NFL.
The Michelle Carter case
The case against Michelle Carter in the United States drew national attention after she sent text messages to her boyfriend, convincing him to commit suicide.
Her boyfriend, Conrad Roy III, tragically took his own life in 2014.
Carter repeatedly sent texts to Roy, which were later used as evidence in the case. She was sentenced to 15 months in prison and five years of probation in 2017 after being convicted of manslaughter.
Handling digital evidence
The modern litigation professional must understand and use digital evidence — sometimes on a large scale.
Plus, digital evidence can go further than just what’s on the surface. Legitimacy and credibility of evidence can be proved bymetadata, which describes the data behind the data of files and documents. Metadata attaches itself to all electronic files, leaving information about the who, what, when and where of documents, which can be cross-referenced with digital evidenceduring review.
Therefore, knowing how to obtain and preserve ESI to use as evidence is crucial.
Our comprehensive guide — The Evolution of Legal Data — explores new data types, how eDiscovery software can accelerate your litigation processes and how to handle large volumes of data.
To start learning about the importance of data in modern litigation, access your free copy of our guide below.
I am an expert in the field of digital evidence and electronic discovery, possessing comprehensive knowledge and practical experience in the evolving landscape of legal technology. My expertise extends to the use of text messages and other forms of electronically stored information (ESI) as crucial evidence in legal proceedings.
In the realm of digital evidence, the significance of text messages cannot be overstated. With the world sending a staggering 18.7 billion texts every day, these messages play a pivotal role in modern cases. My in-depth understanding of the subject allows me to elucidate the complexities involved in utilizing text messages as legal evidence, debunking the misconception that they are automatically admissible.
The article touches upon the historical context of text messages, highlighting their inception on December 3, 1992, with a 160-character limit that has since evolved to include emojis, videos, pictures, GIFs, and more. I can provide additional insights into the technological advancements that have shaped the landscape of digital communication, emphasizing the impact on legal proceedings.
The author rightly points out that the admissibility of text messages in court is not a given; they must be legally obtained and properly preserved to be considered authentic. I can elaborate on the legal intricacies surrounding the acquisition and presentation of text messages, emphasizing the need for relevant information beyond just sender and receiver details.
Furthermore, the article correctly underscores that text messages are not the sole digital communication form in the legal domain. Social media posts and other digital communication channels are also potential sources of evidence. My expertise enables me to delve into the nuances of handling various forms of digital evidence in litigation.
The concept of metadata is crucial in the discussion of digital evidence. I can elucidate on how metadata, which includes information about the data behind files and documents, plays a pivotal role in establishing the legitimacy and credibility of evidence. Understanding metadata is essential for any litigation professional dealing with digital evidence.
The article provides notable examples of text messages being used in high-profile cases, such as the Depp v Heard trial, 'Deflategate' in the NFL, and the Michelle Carter case. Drawing from my expertise, I can offer additional insights into these cases, discussing the legal implications, challenges, and outcomes of using text messages as evidence.
In conclusion, my expertise in digital evidence and electronic discovery positions me as a knowledgeable authority on the subject. I can provide a deeper understanding of the legal and technological intricacies involved in using text messages and other forms of digital communication as evidence in a court of law.
