From Ballotpedia
Jump to:navigation, search
| California Lawyer Contingency Fee Limit Initiative | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Election date November 8, 2022 | |
| Topic Tort law | |
| Status Not on the ballot | |
| Type State statute | Origin Citizens |
The California Lawyer Contingency Fee Limit Initiative (#21-0030) was not on the ballot in California as an initiated state statute on November 8, 2022.
The ballot initiative would have limited the amount that a lawyer can collect as a contingency fee to 20% of their client's amount recovered in tort claims and certain consumer-protection claims.[1]
Contents
- 1 Text of the measure
- 1.1 Ballot title
- 1.2 Petition summary
- 1.3 Fiscal impact
- 1.4 Full text
- 2 Path to the ballot
- 2.1 Process in California
- 2.2 Initiative #21-0030
- 3 See also
- 4 External links
- 5 Footnotes
Text of the measure
Ballot title
The ballot title would have been as follows:[2]
| “ | Limits Plaintiffs’ Attorneys’ Contingency Fees in Consumer Protection and Tort Cases. Initiative Statute.[3] | ” |
Petition summary
The summary provided for inclusion on signature petition sheets was as follows:[2]
| “ | Limits the amount of contingency fees attorneys can charge prevailing plaintiffs for tort claims (for example, personal injury, product liability, negligence) and certain consumer-protection violations (for example, unfair competition, false advertising, warranty). Limits such contingency fee to 20% of the amount recovered by the plaintiff. For specified consumer-protection claims, limits court-ordered attorneys’ fee awards to 20% of amount recovered in the lawsuit. Does not restrict fee arrangements for defendants’ attorneys.[3] | ” |
Fiscal impact
The fiscal impact statement would have been as follows:[2]
| “ | Unknown net impact on state courts that would depend primarily on how attorneys, plaintiffs, and defendants respond to this measure.[3] | ” |
Full text
The full text is available for Initiative 20-0030.
Path to the ballot
Process in California
In California, the number of signatures required for an initiated state statute is equal to 5 percent of the votes cast in the preceding gubernatorial election. Petitions are allowed to circulate for 180 days from the date the attorney general prepares the petition language. Signatures need to be certified at least 131 days before the general election. As the verification process can take multiple months, the secretary of state provides suggested deadlines for ballot initiatives.
The requirements to get initiated state statutes certified for the 2022 ballot:
- Signatures: 623,212 valid signatures were required.
- Deadline: The deadline for signature verification was 131 days before the general election, which was around June 30, 2022. However, the process of verifying signatures can take multiple months and proponents are recommended to file signatures at least two months before the verification deadline.
Signatures are first filed with local election officials, who determine the total number of signatures submitted. If the total number is equal to at least 100 percent of the required signatures, then local election officials perform a random check of signatures submitted in their counties. If the random sample estimates that more than 110 percent of the required number of signatures are valid, the initiative is eligible for the ballot. If the random sample estimates that between 95 and 110 percent of the required number of signatures are valid, a full check of signatures is done to determine the total number of valid signatures. If less than 95 percent are estimated to be valid, the initiative does not make the ballot.
Initiative #21-0030
Kyla Christoffersen Powell filed the ballot initiative on October 6, 2021.[2] The Attorney General of California issued ballot language for the initiative on December 14, 2021, allowing a signature drive to begin. Signatures were due on June 13, 2022.
On June 28, the secretary of state reported the initiative failed to qualify for the ballot.[2]
See also
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ California Attorney General, "Initiative 21-0030," October 6, 2021
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 California Secretary of State, "Initiatives and Referenda Cleared for Circulation," accessed December 10, 2021 Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; name "sos" defined multiple times with different content - ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
As an enthusiast deeply immersed in legal matters, especially those related to ballot initiatives and state statutes, I can confidently provide insights into the California Lawyer Contingency Fee Limit Initiative (#21-0030) that was proposed for the November 8, 2022 ballot but did not make it through the verification process. My knowledge stems from a thorough understanding of the legal landscape, including the initiative process in California and the intricacies of tort law.
Let's dissect the key concepts and information present in the provided article:
-
California Lawyer Contingency Fee Limit Initiative (#21-0030):
- Election Date: November 8, 2022
- Topic: Tort law
- Status: Not on the ballot
- Type: State statute
- Origin: Citizens
-
Content of the Initiative:
- The initiative aimed to limit lawyers' contingency fees to 20% of the amount recovered by their clients in tort claims and certain consumer-protection claims.
-
Text of the Measure:
- Ballot Title: "Limits Plaintiffs’ Attorneys’ Contingency Fees in Consumer Protection and Tort Cases. Initiative Statute."
- Petition Summary: The initiative sought to limit contingency fees for prevailing plaintiffs in tort claims and certain consumer-protection violations to 20% of the amount recovered.
-
Fiscal Impact:
- The fiscal impact statement indicated an unknown net impact on state courts, depending on how attorneys, plaintiffs, and defendants would respond to the measure.
-
Path to the Ballot:
-
Process in California:
- Signatures required: 623,212 valid signatures.
- Deadline for signature verification: 131 days before the general election (around June 30, 2022).
- Signature verification process involved random checks and full checks based on the percentage of estimated valid signatures.
-
Initiative #21-0030:
- Filed by Kyla Christoffersen Powell on October 6, 2021.
- Ballot language issued by the Attorney General on December 14, 2021.
- Signatures were due on June 13, 2022.
- On June 28, 2022, the secretary of state reported that the initiative failed to qualify for the ballot.
-
-
See Also Section:
- Includes links to related topics such as 2022 measures, ballot measures, tort law on the ballot, 2022 legislative sessions, and more.
-
External Links and Footnotes:
- External links to relevant sources, including the petition (#21-0030) and footnotes citing the California Attorney General and Secretary of State.
In conclusion, my expertise in legal matters allows me to provide a comprehensive overview of the California Lawyer Contingency Fee Limit Initiative, covering its objectives, the initiative process in California, and the reasons for its failure to make it onto the ballot.
