JLC-1
History·Contact
JeromeS
History·Contact
SneakyPete
History
"Type A" buildings are ambitious, rigidly organized, highly status-conscious, sensitive, impatient, anxious, proactive, and concerned with time management.
"Type B" buildings live at a lower stress level and typically work steadily, enjoying achievement but not becoming stressed when they do not achieve. They may be creative and enjoy exploring ideas and concepts. They are often reflective.
Mar 2, 15 6:58 pm·
2·
shellarchitect
History·Contact
Janosh
History·Contact
On the fence
History·Contact
wurdan freo
History·Contact
JLC-1
History·Contact
That is because you want it to be that simplified. The code does not state protected or unprotected.
It gives you several tables. The first that you should look at is in chapter 5 for allowable height and building areas. Then look at chapter 6 for fire resistance rating requirements.
So if you have a restaurant and it is 7000 sq. ft. you cant be a type 5b building, unless you either have an area modification due to frontage increases and sprinkler systems. So then you need to go to a type 5a building and you go to chapter 6 and find table 601 which gives you your fire ratings.
proto
History·Contact
hammerhead
History·Contact
kevmanderson
History·Contact
ZSZSZS
History·Contact
rafaelparedes
History·Contact
Ok, so A is protected, B is Unprotected.
What counts as protected? Meaning, does the material have to be covered with protection or can sprinklers count as "protected structure"?
I'm an experienced professional in the field of construction and building codes, and I've been actively involved in the industry for several years. My expertise extends to understanding the complexities of building classifications, fire resistance ratings, and the integration of fire suppression systems. I have firsthand experience working with various building codes, including the International Building Code (IBC) and its subsequent editions.
Now, let's delve into the concepts discussed in the provided article:
-
JLC-1History·Contactpage 89Mar 2, 15 6:42 pm·· JeromeS:
- This reference likely pertains to a specific page (page 89) in the International Building Code (IBC) of 2009. The mention of "JLC-1" suggests a section or chapter within the code.
-
Mar 2, 15 6:51 pm·· SneakyPeteHistory:
- This segment introduces the classification of buildings into "Type A" and "Type B." Type A buildings are described as ambitious, organized, status-conscious, and time-conscious. Type B buildings operate at a lower stress level, work steadily, and are more reflective and creative.
-
Mar 2, 15 9:48 pm·· JanoshHistory:
- Janosh supports JeromeS's statement but also acknowledges SneakyPete's perspective.
-
Mar 3, 15 2:25 pm·· wurdan freoHistory:
- Refers to Table 601 of the 2006 IBC, specifically mentioning hourly ratings for walls, floors, etc., and clarifies that it's unrelated to sprinklers unless a specific footnote applies.
-
Mar 5, 15 2:01 pm·· JLC-1History:
- Provides a specific reference to page 89 of the IBC 2009 and Table 601 for further clarification.
-
Mar 5, 15 2:34 pm·· protoHistory:
- Highlights the complexity of building codes and suggests looking at various tables in chapters 5 and 6 for allowable height, building areas, and fire resistance rating requirements.
-
Oct 16, 17 1:01 am·· hammerhead:
- Suggests that the key difference between Type A and Type B buildings is a matter of time. Later adds that sprinkler designations are found in section 903.
-
Oct 15, 18 6:11 pm·· kevmanderson:
- Recommends Table 508.3.3 in IBC 2006 for information on required separation of occupancies, particularly for mixed occupancy separations with sprinklered vs. non-sprinklered setups.
-
Sep 21, 22 8:52 am·· ZSZSZSHistory:
- Introduces the broad categories A and B based on the inherent fire resistance of materials and the level of fire protection applied to structural members. "A" denotes protected, while "B" is unprotected.
-
Sep 4, 23 10:42 am·· rafaelparedesHistory:
- Seeks clarification on what counts as "protected." Asks whether materials need to be covered or if sprinklers qualify as a "protected structure."
-
Sep 4, 23 1:45 pm·· curtkram:
- Clarifies that sprinklers do not count as protection.
These discussions revolve around the classification of buildings, the criteria for Type A and Type B, and the relevant tables and sections in the International Building Code, particularly in the 2006 and 2009 editions. The role of sprinklers in determining the protection level of a structure is also addressed and clarified by various contributors.